From: Jonas Jelonek <jelonek.jonas@gmail.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jonas Jelonek <jelonek.jonas@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] add gpio-line-mux
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2025 23:17:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251026231754.2368904-1-jelonek.jonas@gmail.com> (raw)
This proposes a new type of virtual GPIO controller and corresponding
driver to provide a 1-to-many mapping between virtual GPIOs and a single
real GPIO in combination with a multiplexer. Existing drivers apparently
do not serve the purpose for what I need.
I came across an issue with a switch device from Zyxel which has two
SFP+ cages. Most similar switches either wire up the SFP signals
(RX_LOS, MOD_ABS, TX_FAULT, TX_DISABLE) directly to the SoC (if it has
enough GPIOs) or two a GPIO expander (for which a driver usually
exists). However, Zyxel decided to do it differently in the following
way:
The signals RX_LOS, MOD_ABS and TX_FAULT share a single GPIO line to
the SoC. Which one is actually connected to that GPIO line at a time
is controlled by a separate multiplexer, a GPIO multiplexer in this
case (which uses two other GPIOs). Only the TX_DISABLE is separate.
The SFP core/driver doesn't seem to support such a usecase for now, for
each signal one needs to specify a separate GPIO like:
los-gpio = <&gpio0 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
mod-def0-gpio = <&gpio0 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
...
But for my device, I actually need to directly specify multiplexing
behavior in the SFP node or provide a mux-controller with 'mux-control'.
To fill this gap, I created a dt-schema and a working driver which
exactly does what is needed. It takes a phandle to a mux-controller and
the 'shared' gpio, and provides several virtual GPIOs based on the
gpio-line-mux-states property.
This virtual gpio-controller can then be referenced in the '-gpio'
properties of the SFP node (or other nodes depending on the usecase) as
usual and do not require any modification to the SFP core/driver.
---
Changelog:
v2: - as requested by Linus:
- renamed from 'gpio-split' to 'gpio-line-mux'
- added better description and examples to DT bindings
- simplified driver
- added missing parts to DT bindings
- dropped RFC tag
- renamed patchset
Link to v1 (in case it isn't linked properly due to changed title):
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20251009223501.570949-1-jelonek.jonas@gmail.com/
---
Jonas Jelonek (2):
dt-bindings: gpio: add gpio-line-mux controller
gpio: add gpio-line-mux driver
.../bindings/gpio/gpio-line-mux.yaml | 108 ++++++++++
.../devicetree/bindings/mux/gpio-mux.yaml | 30 +++
MAINTAINERS | 6 +
drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 10 +
drivers/gpio/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/gpio/gpio-line-mux.c | 194 ++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 349 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-line-mux.yaml
create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpio-line-mux.c
base-commit: 897396b418d1720aac39585b208aada708b5b433
--
2.48.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-10-26 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-26 23:17 Jonas Jelonek [this message]
2025-10-26 23:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: gpio: add gpio-line-mux controller Jonas Jelonek
2025-10-27 11:39 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-10-27 11:47 ` Jonas Jelonek
2025-10-27 13:32 ` Rob Herring
2025-10-26 23:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: add gpio-line-mux driver Jonas Jelonek
2025-10-27 7:51 ` Peter Rosin
2025-10-27 8:26 ` Jonas Jelonek
2025-10-28 9:45 ` Thomas Richard
2025-10-28 10:09 ` Peter Rosin
2025-10-28 10:22 ` Thomas Richard
2025-11-04 14:57 ` Jonas Jelonek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251026231754.2368904-1-jelonek.jonas@gmail.com \
--to=jelonek.jonas@gmail.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peda@axentia.se \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).