From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpout-03.galae.net (smtpout-03.galae.net [185.246.85.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DA0F22A1D5; Tue, 16 Dec 2025 22:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.85.4 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765924821; cv=none; b=iUshJg2K0CoJnzvHysVD4PXTpYi9o4DQ5DybEPglCwz0c4jIqoWh53A758rdRPH0dJoPLxlfTA49uNUgOfgXLYKfoOLx9tbPcWUz/GCyIWftzQLkePuBikMwhY9aB63m2HfYdGRQQ4Q6olnqG/XSv6y4K+B0rDUCqllZ8J+7p6o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765924821; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SFPOamL0cQPXqkLhodBhCDXvus3KxGNWMnm+9DocSlU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GrP3Ezlfrqwfd4a7b4m1avz8/PuXaRZq4v8ht/OBT7RPiqL8Ta4hmzqtdsApKF+ToQ9dK7VJfewzayn50Vxo3op2CQEze38wXWKA7anAMjF3OpBPSMGK0XWu7JFsIQmk6ztp3J+bzBda9UFmPs/ulQu/Mmkgl/V55pCfvrD668M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=UtJIEklL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.85.4 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="UtJIEklL" Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-03.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FFBE4E41C41; Tue, 16 Dec 2025 22:40:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19F146071C; Tue, 16 Dec 2025 22:40:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 331B8102F01D0; Tue, 16 Dec 2025 23:40:00 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1765924813; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: in-reply-to:references; bh=YjySOHXxChpeAIXP7WiviiCVM3iOHIkW8SnbIAyhMbg=; b=UtJIEklL707ymXV/8HCjyKT+EobGjo9ZqL/vbQfvhhbRyudL/xWnk2Mv+F8druWzsb494W cAmzshRPqJbM87ZkegTVdkAF+kU0MP8ZKGR+jKn2V1G7n2aqLHnh8yafzrJVDXwf/veoBk eYMp4u61D4wTi1PjSEGEi5NBxjyfP3SaP+OKlRRy+/+FdG3sDT2neGe0O9iwWwk7hmi0zV 9ar5gz1PnvOx5hBjGQYpUJWnpW97kiCMulKZZMkCFVa8ZlHmkfOQghjw74oEjWm9wUmZMK JfDi9BzBOBDMLQ0ddmoVO4T2fyd6QhWUN2EQUglFcqDbXV7XKtEaiL2/RtkmWg== Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 23:40:00 +0100 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Robert Marko Cc: Conor Dooley , robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev, Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com, daniel.machon@microchip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, vkoul@kernel.org, linux@roeck-us.net, andi.shyti@kernel.org, lee@kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, linusw@kernel.org, olivia@selenic.com, radu_nicolae.pirea@upb.ro, richard.genoud@bootlin.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jirislaby@kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, richardcochran@gmail.com, wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com, romain.sioen@microchip.com, Ryan.Wanner@microchip.com, lars.povlsen@microchip.com, tudor.ambarus@linaro.org, kavyasree.kotagiri@microchip.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, mwalle@kernel.org, luka.perkov@sartura.hr Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/19] dt-bindings: arm: move AT91 to generic Microchip binding Message-ID: <202512162240006f3ddfdf@mail.local> References: <20251215163820.1584926-1-robert.marko@sartura.hr> <20251215163820.1584926-4-robert.marko@sartura.hr> <202512161628415e9896d1@mail.local> <202512161726449fe42d71@mail.local> <20251216-underarm-trapped-626f16d856f5@spud> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 On 16/12/2025 20:35:49+0100, Robert Marko wrote: > Hi Conor, > What do you think about renaming the SparX-5 binding and adding LAN969x to that? > Cause both are from the current Microchip and from the same UNG > business unit, with > probably more generations to follow. > > LAN969x does not really belong in Atmel bindings to me, but I am flexible. > On the contrary, this is the one that is based on the "previously atmel" BU SoCs. It is a sama7 with a microchip UNG switch while SparX-5 looks more like a microsemi chip with ARM64 cores instead of mips. -- Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com