public inbox for linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, tzungbi@kernel.org,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/11] gpio: Remove unused `chip` and `srcu` in struct gpio_device
Date: Tue,  3 Feb 2026 06:10:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260203061059.975605-12-tzungbi@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260203061059.975605-1-tzungbi@kernel.org>

`chip` and `srcu` in struct gpio_device are unused as their usages are
replaced to use revocable.  Remove them.

Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
---
v2:
- No changes.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260116081036.352286-24-tzungbi@kernel.org

 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 26 +-------------------------
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h |  4 ----
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 347ff456858f..bcc7834b2362 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -423,8 +423,6 @@ static int gpiochip_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
-
 	if (WARN_ON(!gc->get_direction))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
@@ -875,7 +873,6 @@ static void gpiodev_release(struct device *dev)
 	ida_free(&gpio_ida, gdev->id);
 	kfree_const(gdev->label);
 	kfree(gdev->descs);
-	cleanup_srcu_struct(&gdev->srcu);
 	kfree(gdev);
 }
 
@@ -1076,14 +1073,9 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
 		goto err_free_gdev;
 	gdev->id = ret;
 
-	ret = init_srcu_struct(&gdev->srcu);
-	if (ret)
-		goto err_free_ida;
-	rcu_assign_pointer(gdev->chip, gc);
-
 	ret = init_srcu_struct(&gdev->desc_srcu);
 	if (ret)
-		goto err_cleanup_gdev_srcu;
+		goto err_free_ida;
 
 	ret = dev_set_name(&gdev->dev, GPIOCHIP_NAME "%d", gdev->id);
 	if (ret)
@@ -1277,8 +1269,6 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
 
 err_cleanup_desc_srcu:
 	cleanup_srcu_struct(&gdev->desc_srcu);
-err_cleanup_gdev_srcu:
-	cleanup_srcu_struct(&gdev->srcu);
 err_free_ida:
 	ida_free(&gpio_ida, gdev->id);
 err_free_gdev:
@@ -1315,8 +1305,6 @@ void gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *gc)
 	synchronize_srcu(&gpio_devices_srcu);
 
 	/* Numb the device, cancelling all outstanding operations */
-	rcu_assign_pointer(gdev->chip, NULL);
-	synchronize_srcu(&gdev->srcu);
 	revocable_provider_revoke(&gdev->chip_rp);
 	gpio_device_teardown_shared(gdev);
 	gpiochip_irqchip_remove(gc);
@@ -2822,8 +2810,6 @@ static int gpiochip_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
-
 	if (WARN_ON(!gc->direction_input))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
@@ -2839,8 +2825,6 @@ static int gpiochip_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset,
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
-
 	if (WARN_ON(!gc->direction_output))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
@@ -2930,8 +2914,6 @@ static int gpiochip_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset, int value)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
-
 	if (WARN_ON(unlikely(!gc->set)))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
@@ -3285,8 +3267,6 @@ static int gpiochip_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
-
 	/* Make sure this is called after checking for gc->get(). */
 	ret = gc->get(gc, offset);
 	if (ret > 1)
@@ -3340,8 +3320,6 @@ static int gpiod_get_raw_value_commit(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
 static int gpio_chip_get_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc,
 				  unsigned long *mask, unsigned long *bits)
 {
-	lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
-
 	if (gc->get_multiple) {
 		int ret;
 
@@ -3695,8 +3673,6 @@ static int gpiochip_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc,
 	unsigned int i;
 	int ret;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&gc->gpiodev->srcu);
-
 	if (gc->set_multiple) {
 		ret = gc->set_multiple(gc, mask, bits);
 		if (ret > 0)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
index ce6273cc74f2..2179074d2362 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
@@ -28,7 +28,6 @@
  * @chrdev: character device for the GPIO device
  * @id: numerical ID number for the GPIO chip
  * @owner: helps prevent removal of modules exporting active GPIOs
- * @chip: pointer to the corresponding gpiochip, holding static
  * data for this device
  * @descs: array of ngpio descriptors.
  * @valid_mask: If not %NULL, holds bitmask of GPIOs which are valid to be
@@ -51,7 +50,6 @@
  *                 process context
  * @device_notifier: used to notify character device wait queues about the GPIO
  *                   device being unregistered
- * @srcu: protects the pointer to the underlying GPIO chip
  * @chip_rp: revocable provider handle for the corresponding struct gpio_chip.
  * @pin_ranges: range of pins served by the GPIO driver
  *
@@ -65,7 +63,6 @@ struct gpio_device {
 	struct cdev		chrdev;
 	int			id;
 	struct module		*owner;
-	struct gpio_chip __rcu	*chip;
 	struct gpio_desc	*descs;
 	unsigned long		*valid_mask;
 	struct srcu_struct	desc_srcu;
@@ -79,7 +76,6 @@ struct gpio_device {
 	rwlock_t		line_state_lock;
 	struct workqueue_struct	*line_state_wq;
 	struct blocking_notifier_head device_notifier;
-	struct srcu_struct	srcu;
 	struct revocable_provider __rcu *chip_rp;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PINCTRL
-- 
2.53.0.rc2.204.g2597b5adb4-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-02-03  6:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-03  6:10 [PATCH v2 00/11] gpio: Adopt revocable mechanism for UAF prevention Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-03  6:10 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] gpio: Access `gpio_bus_type` in gpiochip_setup_dev() Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-03  6:10 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] gpio: Remove redundant check for struct gpio_chip Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-03  6:10 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] gpio: sysfs: " Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-04 10:33   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-05  8:51     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-03  6:10 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] gpio: Ensure struct gpio_chip for gpiochip_setup_dev() Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-04 10:36   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-05  8:51     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-03  6:10 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] gpio: cdev: Don't check struct gpio_chip in gpio_chrdev_open() Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-03  6:10 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] selftests: gpio: Add gpio-cdev-uaf tests Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-03  6:10 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] gpio: Add revocable provider handle for struct gpio_chip Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-04 12:58   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-05  8:52     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-05 16:57       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-06  9:13         ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-03  6:10 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] gpio: cdev: Leverage revocable for accessing " Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-03  9:51   ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-04 13:02   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-03  6:10 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] gpio: Remove gpio_chip_guard by using revocable Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-04 13:05   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-03  6:10 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] gpio: Leverage revocable for accessing struct gpio_chip Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-03  6:10 ` Tzung-Bi Shih [this message]
2026-02-03 11:15 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] gpio: Adopt revocable mechanism for UAF prevention Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-03 16:53 ` Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260203061059.975605-12-tzungbi@kernel.org \
    --to=tzungbi@kernel.org \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linusw@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox