From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30A3740F8D7; Wed, 4 Feb 2026 14:11:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770214285; cv=none; b=f3wbyLIKoTfnq5SFIPVWyHcw5UAY6JahPXUcNEYHjAYD2HLu6wlGlLdxWHku1H0/APJIjhwRSSzik+vEE0DB/s1nCtasoWQUYflPL9Lr5zdvHrq9os+LF0UOf80B6jG9meoSJ8SgzybbUP3VkJykL+tghOORZ0toEKe+gTNedyc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770214285; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WH5QahUO7WVTbnWGYJja/z9xS/7meXJGhqhU/1bxuok=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=HSPuFRgOaIOSNCtYwBBORBQZfmNlQZk+wKS0nH9Bpt5u0+VGVwfgKYmHGRq7Kl7XDOzl98njodNFHcs0Mwg2kj7NrUR4NbmihKSTa8vPfWbzbqxMR4WHSQq3X4tcCp/jB/wUfnxipn8YPQ9stoRrqJ5srGd5NEi9wMvUzKHkbjc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=e70dhP5C; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="e70dhP5C" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 01DABC19424; Wed, 4 Feb 2026 14:11:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1770214284; bh=WH5QahUO7WVTbnWGYJja/z9xS/7meXJGhqhU/1bxuok=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=e70dhP5CPwYeTcgaf+EAe9PXl3GthoEElxicQBwIn1zimM81lqnxpEyYqBS2UZhhJ pAg7k0anT/V/3hIxzVpnV7OL1zI8yXzVrRIZyxSRVkGevzVl7RHg3zGZZ2GdK9pVks uDETtkjHc50NNZbm4O3Yo6haP8kdVGw0TG/e97c/+qN7CAOeBzoqYv507E5XxmFACV bpUTSxpvj94cMsNAuEflKlfGyYyltq/wUICXhgHhIjjP0AmndGqOoLjtb0aMEPmDy/ ehVaUHq3oMJJ4PiBKsU64PsDkCaSjL9n3LulOznEOALfPXLNU2ByzJC6u/Xj++qN3M xsIx6VEakYydQ== Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 14:11:20 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: Linus Walleij Cc: Conor Dooley , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [rfc 0/2] pinctrl property checks Message-ID: <20260204-twentieth-facedown-55eca3d3022c@spud> References: <20260203-device-unwashed-ed24f8592d79@spud> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1CSrqGD1uvf0jDND" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --1CSrqGD1uvf0jDND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 12:30:30AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 6:30=E2=80=AFPM Conor Dooley wr= ote: >=20 > > Finally got around to sending the property stuff that we were talking > > about. It's definitely not the best thing I have ever written, but I > > think it does an okay job of warning about setups that don't make sense > > while adding fairly little complexity wise. >=20 > I like what I see and I think we should apply it for the v7.1 kernel cycle > post v7.0-rc1. >=20 > Are you ready to send a non-RFC version by then? The rfc tag is was more because of the point in the cycle we are at than the question on the driver patch. Sending a non-rtc then should be no problem. --1CSrqGD1uvf0jDND Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCaYNTiAAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0rO1AQDg2EjTzYP8wXL3AM47YYwKhhkjEFNhP7YVRUnka16L8AD/XkHcx6LuEzeF qVo9fhZVhLDlgsnridoejiLDPSQkLgo= =icK+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1CSrqGD1uvf0jDND--