From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: patches@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jan Remmet <j.remmet@phytec.de>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linusw@kernel.org, brgl@kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.19-6.18] gpio: pca953x: Add support for TCAL6408 TCAL6416
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2026 19:59:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260214010245.3671907-99-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260214010245.3671907-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Jan Remmet <j.remmet@phytec.de>
[ Upstream commit a30a9cb9bca4296d25f253619883e7013b6be158 ]
TCAL6408 and TCAL6416 supports latchable inputs and maskable interrupt.
Tested on a TCAL6416, checked datasheets for the TCAL6408.
They use the same programming model ad the NXP PCAL64xx, but
support a lower supply power (1.08V to 3.6V) compared to PCAL
(1.65V to 5.5V)
Datasheet: https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tcal6408.pdf
Datasheet: https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tcal6416.pdf
Signed-off-by: Jan Remmet <j.remmet@phytec.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251216-wip-jremmet-tcal6416rtw-v2-3-6516d98a9836@phytec.de
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
LLM Generated explanations, may be completely bogus:
Good - there's no fallback compatible mechanism here. Each chip gets its
own compatible string.
## Complete Analysis
### 1. Commit Message Analysis
The commit message is clear and well-structured:
- Explicitly states the chips use "the same programming model as the NXP
PCAL64xx"
- Only difference is supply voltage range (1.08V-3.6V vs 1.65V-5.5V)
- References both datasheets for verification
- States it was "Tested on a TCAL6416" — author has real hardware
- The author (from phytec.de, an embedded hardware company) has a clear
use case
### 2. Code Change Analysis
The changes are **purely table additions**:
**I2C device ID table** (`pca953x_id[]`): Adds 2 entries:
- `{ "tcal6408", 8 | PCA953X_TYPE | PCA_LATCH_INT, }` — 8-bit GPIO
expander with PCAL features
- `{ "tcal6416", 16 | PCA953X_TYPE | PCA_LATCH_INT, }` — 16-bit GPIO
expander with PCAL features
These use the exact same type flags (`PCA953X_TYPE | PCA_LATCH_INT`) as
the already-supported `pcal6408` and `pcal6416`, confirming identical
register layout handling.
**OF match table** (`pca953x_dt_ids[]`): Adds 2 entries:
- `{ .compatible = "ti,tcal6408", .data = OF_953X(8, PCA_LATCH_INT), }`
- `{ .compatible = "ti,tcal6416", .data = OF_953X(16, PCA_LATCH_INT), }`
**Kconfig**: Updates help text to list the new chip names (purely
cosmetic).
**No new code paths**, no new functions, no new registers, no new logic.
The `PCA_LATCH_INT` flag (`PCA_PCAL | PCA_INT`) already enables all the
extended PCAL register handling throughout the driver (input latching,
interrupt masking, pull-up/down config, interrupt status).
### 3. Classification
This is a textbook **new device ID** addition to an existing driver. The
analysis guidelines explicitly call this out:
> NEW DEVICE IDs (Very Common): Adding PCI IDs, USB IDs, ACPI IDs, etc.
to existing drivers. These are trivial one-line additions that enable
hardware support. Rule: The driver must already exist in stable; only
the ID is new.
The `pca953x` driver exists in all stable trees (it's been in the kernel
for over 15 years). The TCAL chips use the exact same PCAL register
model that's already fully supported.
### 4. Scope and Risk Assessment
- **Lines changed**: ~10 lines across 2 files (Kconfig help text +
device tables)
- **Files touched**: 2 (`Kconfig`, `gpio-pca953x.c`)
- **Risk**: Essentially zero. Table entries can only affect systems with
these specific chips. No existing functionality is modified.
- **Merge conflicts**: The entries are added at the end of their
respective groups, so conflicts are unlikely unless another chip was
added in the same spot.
### 5. User Impact
- Users with TCAL6408 or TCAL6416 on their boards (embedded systems,
industrial boards) cannot use these chips without this patch
- Without this patch, the hardware is completely non-functional for
these users
- Phytec (the author's company) ships embedded modules that likely use
these chips
### 6. Dependencies
- The DT binding YAML update (patch 1-2 of the series) is needed for
`dt_binding_check` but is NOT needed for the driver to function. A
device tree using `compatible = "ti,tcal6408"` or `compatible =
"ti,tcal6416"` will be matched by the driver with just this patch.
- No code dependencies on other patches.
### 7. Precedent
The exact same pattern has been used many times for this driver. For
example:
- `82466bb622e92` "gpio: pca953x: Add support for TI TCA9535 variant" —
same pattern, same situation (lower voltage TI variant of NXP chip)
- `6c99a046edfac` "gpio: pca953x: Add support for TI TCA6418"
- `a9e49635e263b` "gpio: pca953xx: Add support for pca6408"
### Summary
This is a pure device ID addition to a well-established, widely-used
GPIO expander driver. The TCAL6408/TCAL6416 are Texas Instruments chips
that are register-compatible with the already-supported NXP
PCAL6408/PCAL6416. The change adds only table entries (I2C device IDs
and OF compatible strings) and zero new code logic. It enables real
hardware for real users (tested on actual hardware), with effectively
zero risk of regression to existing users. This is precisely the kind of
"device ID addition" that stable kernel guidelines explicitly allow as
an exception.
**YES**
drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 4 ++--
drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
index bd185482a7fdf..3439e025ba1c6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
@@ -1193,11 +1193,11 @@ config GPIO_PCA953X
8 bits: max7310, max7315, pca6107, pca9534, pca9538, pca9554,
pca9556, pca9557, pca9574, tca6408, tca9554, xra1202,
- pcal6408, pcal9554b, tca9538
+ pcal6408, pcal9554b, tca9538, tcal6408
16 bits: max7312, max7313, pca9535, pca9539, pca9555, pca9575,
tca6416, pca6416, pcal6416, pcal9535, pcal9555a, max7318,
- tca9539
+ tca9539, tcal6416
18 bits: tca6418
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
index f93a3dbb2daaf..52e96cc5f67bb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
@@ -126,6 +126,9 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id pca953x_id[] = {
{ "tca9539", 16 | PCA953X_TYPE | PCA_INT, },
{ "tca9554", 8 | PCA953X_TYPE | PCA_INT, },
{ "xra1202", 8 | PCA953X_TYPE },
+
+ { "tcal6408", 8 | PCA953X_TYPE | PCA_LATCH_INT, },
+ { "tcal6416", 16 | PCA953X_TYPE | PCA_LATCH_INT, },
{ }
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, pca953x_id);
@@ -1469,6 +1472,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id pca953x_dt_ids[] = {
{ .compatible = "ti,tca9538", .data = OF_953X( 8, PCA_INT), },
{ .compatible = "ti,tca9539", .data = OF_953X(16, PCA_INT), },
+ { .compatible = "ti,tcal6408", .data = OF_953X( 8, PCA_LATCH_INT), },
+ { .compatible = "ti,tcal6416", .data = OF_953X(16, PCA_LATCH_INT), },
+
{ .compatible = "onnn,cat9554", .data = OF_953X( 8, PCA_INT), },
{ .compatible = "onnn,pca9654", .data = OF_953X( 8, PCA_INT), },
{ .compatible = "onnn,pca9655", .data = OF_953X(16, PCA_INT), },
--
2.51.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-14 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260214010245.3671907-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2026-02-14 0:59 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.19-5.10] gpio: aspeed-sgpio: Change the macro to support deferred probe Sasha Levin
2026-02-14 0:59 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260214010245.3671907-99-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=j.remmet@phytec.de \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox