From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>, Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, tzungbi@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/6] gpio: Remove redundant check for struct gpio_chip
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 14:17:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260223061726.82161-3-tzungbi@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260223061726.82161-1-tzungbi@kernel.org>
gpiolib_dbg_show() is only called by gpiolib_seq_show() which has
ensured the struct gpio_chip. Remove the redundant check in
gpiolib_dbg_show().
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
---
v4:
- Add R-b tag.
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260213092958.864411-3-tzungbi@kernel.org
- No changes.
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260203061059.975605-3-tzungbi@kernel.org
- No changes.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260116081036.352286-8-tzungbi@kernel.org
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 13 ++-----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 0a73561060dd..08a3697dbd5a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -5312,23 +5312,14 @@ core_initcall(gpiolib_dev_init);
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
-static void gpiolib_dbg_show(struct seq_file *s, struct gpio_device *gdev)
+static void gpiolib_dbg_show(struct seq_file *s, struct gpio_chip *gc)
{
bool active_low, is_irq, is_out;
struct gpio_desc *desc;
unsigned int gpio = 0;
- struct gpio_chip *gc;
unsigned long flags;
int value;
- guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu);
-
- gc = srcu_dereference(gdev->chip, &gdev->srcu);
- if (!gc) {
- seq_puts(s, "Underlying GPIO chip is gone\n");
- return;
- }
-
for_each_gpio_desc(gc, desc) {
guard(srcu)(&desc->gdev->desc_srcu);
flags = READ_ONCE(desc->flags);
@@ -5441,7 +5432,7 @@ static int gpiolib_seq_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
if (gc->dbg_show)
gc->dbg_show(s, gc);
else
- gpiolib_dbg_show(s, gdev);
+ gpiolib_dbg_show(s, gc);
return 0;
}
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-23 6:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-23 6:17 [PATCH v4 0/6] gpio: Refactor and add selftest Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-23 6:17 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] gpio: Access `gpio_bus_type` in gpiochip_setup_dev() Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-03-11 11:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-03-11 14:36 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-03-12 4:52 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-23 6:17 ` Tzung-Bi Shih [this message]
2026-02-23 6:17 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] gpio: sysfs: Remove redundant check for struct gpio_chip Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-23 6:17 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] gpio: Ensure struct gpio_chip for gpiochip_setup_dev() Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-27 21:36 ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-02-28 10:03 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-28 13:20 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-23 6:17 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] gpio: cdev: Don't check struct gpio_chip in gpio_chrdev_open() Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-23 6:17 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] selftests: gpio: Add gpio-cdev-uaf tests Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-25 10:26 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] gpio: Refactor and add selftest Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-26 12:44 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-02-27 9:10 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-27 9:08 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-02-27 9:22 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260223061726.82161-3-tzungbi@kernel.org \
--to=tzungbi@kernel.org \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox