Linux GPIO subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Marco Scardovi (scardracs)" <mscardovi95@gmail.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <westeri@kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Marco Scardovi (scardracs)" <mscardovi95@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 11/12] gpiolib: acpi: Add dedicated ACPI GPIO events module
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 09:53:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260518075357.112584-12-mscardovi95@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260518075357.112584-1-mscardovi95@gmail.com>

Assisted-by: Antigravity:gemini-3-flash
Signed-off-by: Marco Scardovi <mscardovi95@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/Makefile              |   2 +-
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi-events.c | 309 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 310 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi-events.c

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Makefile b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
index 1a416305465b..75b38577b328 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OF_GPIO)		+= gpiolib-of.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_CDEV)		+= gpiolib-cdev.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_SYSFS)	+= gpiolib-sysfs.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ACPI)		+= gpiolib-acpi.o
-gpiolib-acpi-y			:= gpiolib-acpi-core.o gpiolib-acpi-quirks.o gpiolib-acpi-opregion.o
+gpiolib-acpi-y			:= gpiolib-acpi-core.o gpiolib-acpi-quirks.o gpiolib-acpi-opregion.o gpiolib-acpi-events.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIOLIB)		+= gpiolib-swnode.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_SHARED)	+= gpiolib-shared.o
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi-events.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi-events.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..317528a25c92
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi-events.c
@@ -0,0 +1,309 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * ACPI Event and Interrupt helper for GPIO API
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2026, Intel Corporation
+ */
+
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
+#include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/list.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+#include "gpiolib.h"
+#include "gpiolib-acpi.h"
+
+static irqreturn_t acpi_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
+{
+	struct acpi_gpio_event *event = data;
+
+	acpi_evaluate_object(event->handle, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t acpi_gpio_irq_handler_evt(int irq, void *data)
+{
+	struct acpi_gpio_event *event = data;
+
+	acpi_execute_simple_method(event->handle, NULL, event->pin);
+
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static void acpi_gpiochip_request_irq(struct acpi_gpio_chip *acpi_gpio,
+				      struct acpi_gpio_event *event)
+{
+	struct device *parent = acpi_gpio->chip->parent;
+	int ret, value;
+
+	ret = request_threaded_irq(event->irq, NULL, event->handler,
+				   event->irqflags | IRQF_ONESHOT, "ACPI:Event", event);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(parent, "Failed to setup interrupt handler for %d\n", event->irq);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (event->irq_is_wake)
+		enable_irq_wake(event->irq);
+
+	event->irq_requested = true;
+
+	/*
+	 * Make sure we trigger the initial state of ActiveBoth IRQs.
+	 *
+	 * According to the Microsoft GPIO documentation, triggering GPIO
+	 * interrupts marked as ActiveBoth during initialization is correct
+	 * as long as the associated GPIO line is already "asserted"
+	 * (logic level low). We should not trigger edge-based GPIO
+	 * interrupts not marked as ActiveBoth.
+	 *
+	 * See: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/bringup/general-purpose-i-o--gpio-
+	 * Section: "GPIO controllers and ActiveBoth interrupts"
+	 */
+	if (acpi_gpio_need_run_edge_events_on_boot() &&
+	    ((event->irqflags & (IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING)) ==
+	     (IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING))) {
+		value = gpiod_get_raw_value_cansleep(event->desc);
+		if (value == 0)
+			event->handler(event->irq, event);
+	}
+}
+
+static void acpi_gpiochip_request_irqs(struct acpi_gpio_chip *acpi_gpio)
+{
+	struct acpi_gpio_event *event;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(event, &acpi_gpio->events, node)
+		acpi_gpiochip_request_irq(acpi_gpio, event);
+}
+
+bool acpi_gpio_irq_is_wake(struct device *parent,
+			   const struct acpi_resource_gpio *agpio)
+{
+	unsigned int pin;
+
+	if (agpio->pin_table_length == 0)
+		return false;
+
+	pin = agpio->pin_table[0];
+
+	if (agpio->wake_capable != ACPI_WAKE_CAPABLE)
+		return false;
+
+	if (acpi_gpio_in_ignore_list(ACPI_GPIO_IGNORE_WAKE, dev_name(parent), pin)) {
+		dev_info(parent, "Ignoring wakeup on pin %u\n", pin);
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+/* Always returns AE_OK so that we keep looping over the resources */
+static acpi_status acpi_gpiochip_alloc_event(struct acpi_resource *ares,
+					     void *context)
+{
+	struct acpi_gpio_chip *acpi_gpio = context;
+	struct gpio_chip *chip = acpi_gpio->chip;
+	struct acpi_resource_gpio *agpio;
+	acpi_handle handle, evt_handle;
+	struct acpi_gpio_event *event;
+	irq_handler_t handler = NULL;
+	struct gpio_desc *desc;
+	unsigned int pin;
+	int ret, irq;
+
+	if (!acpi_gpio_get_irq_resource(ares, &agpio))
+		return AE_OK;
+
+	if (agpio->pin_table_length == 0)
+		return AE_OK;
+
+	handle = ACPI_HANDLE(chip->parent);
+	pin = agpio->pin_table[0];
+
+	if (pin <= 255) {
+		char ev_name[8];
+
+		snprintf(ev_name, sizeof(ev_name), "_%c%02X",
+			 agpio->triggering == ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE ? 'E' : 'L',
+			 pin);
+		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, ev_name, &evt_handle)))
+			handler = acpi_gpio_irq_handler;
+	}
+	if (!handler) {
+		if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_EVT", &evt_handle)))
+			handler = acpi_gpio_irq_handler_evt;
+	}
+	if (!handler)
+		return AE_OK;
+
+	if (acpi_gpio_in_ignore_list(ACPI_GPIO_IGNORE_INTERRUPT, dev_name(chip->parent), pin)) {
+		dev_info(chip->parent, "Ignoring interrupt on pin %u\n", pin);
+		return AE_OK;
+	}
+
+	desc = acpi_request_own_gpiod(chip, agpio, 0, "ACPI:Event");
+	if (IS_ERR(desc)) {
+		dev_err(chip->parent,
+			"Failed to request GPIO for pin 0x%04X, err %pe\n",
+			pin, desc);
+		return AE_OK;
+	}
+
+	ret = gpiochip_lock_as_irq(chip, pin);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(chip->parent,
+			"Failed to lock GPIO pin 0x%04X as interrupt, err %d\n",
+			pin, ret);
+		goto fail_free_desc;
+	}
+
+	irq = gpiod_to_irq(desc);
+	if (irq < 0) {
+		dev_err(chip->parent,
+			"Failed to translate GPIO pin 0x%04X to IRQ, err %d\n",
+			pin, irq);
+		goto fail_unlock_irq;
+	}
+
+	event = kzalloc_obj(*event);
+	if (!event)
+		goto fail_unlock_irq;
+
+	event->irqflags = IRQF_ONESHOT;
+	if (agpio->triggering == ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE) {
+		if (agpio->polarity == ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH)
+			event->irqflags |= IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH;
+		else
+			event->irqflags |= IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW;
+	} else {
+		switch (agpio->polarity) {
+		case ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH:
+			event->irqflags |= IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING;
+			break;
+		case ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW:
+			event->irqflags |= IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING;
+			break;
+		default:
+			event->irqflags |= IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING |
+					   IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	event->handle = evt_handle;
+	event->handler = handler;
+	event->irq = irq;
+	event->irq_is_wake = acpi_gpio_irq_is_wake(chip->parent, agpio);
+	event->pin = pin;
+	event->desc = desc;
+
+	list_add_tail(&event->node, &acpi_gpio->events);
+
+	return AE_OK;
+
+fail_unlock_irq:
+	gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(chip, pin);
+fail_free_desc:
+	gpiochip_free_own_desc(desc);
+
+	return AE_OK;
+}
+
+/**
+ * acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts() - Register isr for gpio chip ACPI events
+ * @chip:      GPIO chip
+ *
+ * ACPI5 platforms can use GPIO signaled ACPI events. These GPIO interrupts are
+ * handled by ACPI event methods which need to be called from the GPIO
+ * chip's interrupt handler. acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts() finds out which
+ * GPIO pins have ACPI event methods and assigns interrupt handlers that calls
+ * the ACPI event methods for those pins.
+ */
+void acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts(struct gpio_chip *chip)
+{
+	struct acpi_gpio_chip *acpi_gpio;
+	acpi_handle handle;
+	acpi_status status;
+
+	if (!chip->parent || !chip->to_irq)
+		return;
+
+	handle = ACPI_HANDLE(chip->parent);
+	if (!handle)
+		return;
+
+	status = acpi_get_data(handle, acpi_gpio_chip_dh, (void **)&acpi_gpio);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+		return;
+
+	if (acpi_quirk_skip_gpio_event_handlers())
+		return;
+
+	acpi_walk_resources(handle, METHOD_NAME__AEI,
+			    acpi_gpiochip_alloc_event, acpi_gpio);
+
+	if (acpi_gpio_add_to_deferred_list(&acpi_gpio->deferred_req_irqs_list_entry))
+		return;
+
+	acpi_gpiochip_request_irqs(acpi_gpio);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_gpiochip_request_interrupts);
+
+/**
+ * acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts() - Free GPIO ACPI event interrupts.
+ * @chip:      GPIO chip
+ *
+ * Free interrupts associated with GPIO ACPI event method for the given
+ * GPIO chip.
+ */
+void acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts(struct gpio_chip *chip)
+{
+	struct acpi_gpio_chip *acpi_gpio;
+	struct acpi_gpio_event *event, *ep;
+	acpi_handle handle;
+	acpi_status status;
+
+	if (!chip->parent || !chip->to_irq)
+		return;
+
+	handle = ACPI_HANDLE(chip->parent);
+	if (!handle)
+		return;
+
+	status = acpi_get_data(handle, acpi_gpio_chip_dh, (void **)&acpi_gpio);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+		return;
+
+	acpi_gpio_remove_from_deferred_list(&acpi_gpio->deferred_req_irqs_list_entry);
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(event, ep, &acpi_gpio->events, node) {
+		if (event->irq_requested) {
+			if (event->irq_is_wake)
+				disable_irq_wake(event->irq);
+
+			free_irq(event->irq, event);
+		}
+
+		gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(chip, event->pin);
+		gpiochip_free_own_desc(event->desc);
+		list_del(&event->node);
+		kfree(event);
+	}
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts);
+
+void __init acpi_gpio_process_deferred_list(struct list_head *list)
+{
+	struct acpi_gpio_chip *acpi_gpio, *tmp;
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(acpi_gpio, tmp, list, deferred_req_irqs_list_entry)
+		acpi_gpiochip_request_irqs(acpi_gpio);
+}
-- 
2.54.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-18  7:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-18  7:53 [PATCH 00/12] gpiolib: acpi: Refactor, harden, and modularize ACPI GPIO support Marco Scardovi (scardracs)
2026-05-18  7:53 ` [PATCH 01/12] gpiolib: acpi: Use snprintf() for ACPI event name formatting Marco Scardovi (scardracs)
2026-05-18  8:07   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-18  7:53 ` [PATCH 02/12] gpiolib: acpi: Modernize string parsing in quirks layer Marco Scardovi (scardracs)
2026-05-18  8:11   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-18  7:53 ` [PATCH 03/12] gpiolib: acpi: Add robust bounds-checking for GPIO pin resources Marco Scardovi (scardracs)
2026-05-18 10:33   ` Mika Westerberg
2026-05-19  7:00     ` [PATCH v2 0/2] gpiolib: acpi: Add bounds-checking and fix leak in OpRegion Marco Scardovi (scardracs)
2026-05-19  7:00       ` [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: acpi: Add robust bounds-checking for GPIO pin resources Marco Scardovi (scardracs)
2026-05-19  7:25         ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-19  7:00       ` [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: acpi: Fix resource leak in OpRegion cleanup path Marco Scardovi (scardracs)
2026-05-19  8:28         ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-20  7:45           ` [PATCH v3 0/2] gpiolib: acpi: Fix bounds-checking and connection leak Marco Scardovi (scardracs)
2026-05-20  7:45             ` [PATCH v3 1/2] gpiolib: acpi: Add robust bounds-checking for GPIO pin resources Marco Scardovi (scardracs)
2026-06-02  7:34               ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-20  7:45             ` [PATCH v3 2/2] Fixes: gpiolib: acpi: resource leak in OpRegion Marco Scardovi (scardracs)
2026-06-02  7:45               ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-02  7:47             ` [PATCH v3 0/2] gpiolib: acpi: Fix bounds-checking and connection leak Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-18  7:53 ` [PATCH 04/12] gpiolib: acpi: Fix resource leak in OpRegion cleanup path Marco Scardovi (scardracs)
2026-05-18  7:53 ` [PATCH 05/12] gpiolib: acpi: Declare shared structures in gpiolib-acpi.h Marco Scardovi (scardracs)
2026-05-18  8:21   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-18  7:53 ` [PATCH 06/12] gpiolib: acpi: Expose core GPIO resource and OpRegion helpers Marco Scardovi (scardracs)
2026-05-18  7:53 ` [PATCH 07/12] gpiolib: acpi: Add dedicated Operation Region module Marco Scardovi (scardracs)
2026-05-18  7:53 ` [PATCH 08/12] gpiolib: acpi: Divert OpRegion registration callbacks from core Marco Scardovi (scardracs)
2026-05-18  7:53 ` [PATCH 09/12] gpiolib: acpi: Remove unused static address space emulation " Marco Scardovi (scardracs)
2026-05-18  7:53 ` [PATCH 10/12] gpiolib: acpi: Declare shared event helpers in gpiolib-acpi.h Marco Scardovi (scardracs)
2026-05-18  7:53 ` Marco Scardovi (scardracs) [this message]
2026-05-18  7:53 ` [PATCH 12/12] gpiolib: acpi: Decouple Event and Interrupt handling from core Marco Scardovi (scardracs)
2026-05-18  8:19 ` [PATCH 00/12] gpiolib: acpi: Refactor, harden, and modularize ACPI GPIO support Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260518075357.112584-12-mscardovi95@gmail.com \
    --to=mscardovi95@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=brgl@kernel.org \
    --cc=linusw@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=westeri@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox