From: Daniel Drake <dan@reactivated.net>
To: linusw@kernel.org, brgl@kernel.org
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Daniel Drake <dan@reactivated.net>
Subject: [PATCH] gpiolib: handle gpio-hogs only once
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2026 22:56:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260607215647.112488-1-dan@reactivated.net> (raw)
Commit d1d564ec49929 ("gpio: move hogs into GPIO core") introduced a
behaviour change that breaks boot on Raspberry Pi 5 when using the
firmware-supplied device tree:
gpiochip_add_data_with_key: GPIOs 544..575
(/soc@107c000000/gpio@7d517c00) failed to register, -22
brcmstb-gpio 107d517c00.gpio: Could not add gpiochip for bank 1
brcmstb-gpio 107d517c00.gpio: probe with driver brcmstb-gpio failed
with error -22
gpio-brcmstb registers two gpio_chips against the device tree
node gpio@7d517c00, one for each bank. The firmware-supplied DT includes
a gpio-hog on RP1 RUN, and this gpio-hog is attempted to be applied to
*both* gpio_chips. This succeeds against bank 0 (which hosts the GPIO)
and fails for bank 1 (which does not).
In the previous implementation, failures to apply gpio-hogs were
quietly ignored. In the new code, the error code propagates and causes
probe to fail.
Closely approximate the previous behaviour by ensuring that each
gpio-hog is processed only once. The handling of gpio-hogs on a DT node
with multiple gpio_chips remains a bit incomplete/unclear, but this at
least retains the ability to apply hogs to the first gpio_chip per node.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dan@reactivated.net>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
This bug is only exposed by the firmware-provided DT that has the
gpio-hog. The DT shipped in the mainline kernel does not have the hog
here. I'm not sure to what extent Linux cares about supporting the
RPi-downstream firmware DT.
I'm also happy to consider other approaches. This multi-gpiochip setup is
a bit weird and gpio-brcmstb could perhaps be converted to register only a
single gpio_chip covering all banks. I verified that the other drivers
that obviously follow this same multiple-gpiochip pattern
(pinctrl-amlogic-a4, pinctrl-st and pinctrl-stm32) do not seem to be used by
any board DTs that include gpio-hogs.
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 1e6dce430dca..fc4dacee0a84 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -1031,6 +1031,11 @@ static int gpiochip_hog_lines(struct gpio_chip *gc)
if (!fwnode_property_present(fwnode, "gpio-hog"))
continue;
+ /* The hog may have been handled by another gpio_chip on the same fwnode */
+ if (is_of_node(fwnode) &&
+ of_node_check_flag(to_of_node(fwnode), OF_POPULATED))
+ continue;
+
ret = gpiochip_add_hog(gc, fwnode);
if (ret)
return ret;
--
2.54.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-07 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-07 21:56 Daniel Drake [this message]
2026-06-08 6:37 ` [PATCH] gpiolib: handle gpio-hogs only once Daniel Drake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260607215647.112488-1-dan@reactivated.net \
--to=dan@reactivated.net \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox