From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1390F3BE652; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 11:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781610541; cv=none; b=Qv3RY1AuPFlNj9H9KDssUw7JqSomheAuldNoIIMyRbN1MMWSQXGrehmvAv1I2O5HVYz0MHVGJCylDvQx1rw3jB8vqE0k+pDyWlp2b78+lS/X9pMsp4pxtvi6IoD02W3crYbqPsBc4FzgZoKGIqV1UU+PZty6f093t6SvPPz/q1E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781610541; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aO45Q+jDcjXxxuMlM8sy4Wk/rgS0vfzneOUX2otqAOg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=K3K9VuSWSw3nDEDe4M6xjxTDDT8jLYiN5AJWXi+WgJbk3iYbn5IdtCVdgfv1pvCZjQAV1YSsoAP15gF4wjOhvoqGSQAj6hquZI3k00UMc0AoPSxjKS1CPNjBp0gIW9sXgtnpTmbaTNoS1RhpKaCYN/qe9Tu6dilPkyJo1dQHAFE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=AsrNqr0p; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="AsrNqr0p" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1781610540; x=1813146540; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=aO45Q+jDcjXxxuMlM8sy4Wk/rgS0vfzneOUX2otqAOg=; b=AsrNqr0pVFnH9a5GgXIdFzuIFMRBUHlyec3DZxYBtIOt72SwYMGxJbEO dL3Xrsz3Gh4itAHGUmofxoCLN8Egwgw1rteY3IGG2vv4z7i8cs/RdyqXf j9TE5Etq6nRdWXyJlJFR3IF714Y7I3qlRg30qI5Ex258nkmL66eaH+3dR woHRWCesTiumvhYYw2AojB/Wh4U44/du+fGr2q5K1XmAjl/B4zAbnfYVa DmmjCittcusBaH7BJ4t/6Raw9H43KpnvqcJCYAWPIS6cYYgydniuhJ8ij fPYc7GetP/IpFWaHDaYONn9jl+VRYzLZX023j8q2KPxaNIJsWQrRZPvYO g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: mHSSzoNPT+ue5XHsrSB6yg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: t6DfZr0mTsqR6Qaqg1QQFQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11818"; a="92933095" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,208,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="92933095" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jun 2026 04:48:59 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: /C4kQM+HQdGrxKiAx633CA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: yJmUAN9uSc6404gneupX+Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,208,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="252871137" Received: from black.igk.intel.com ([10.91.253.5]) by fmviesa005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Jun 2026 04:48:57 -0700 Received: by black.igk.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F217698; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 13:48:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 13:48:55 +0200 From: Mika Westerberg To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , Mika Westerberg , Linus Walleij , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marco Scardovi Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] gpiolib: acpi: Add robust bounds-checking and safe address handling Message-ID: <20260616114855.GD2990@black.igk.intel.com> References: <20260610154204.110379-1-scardracs@disroot.org> <20260612085257.GY2990@black.igk.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 02:28:00PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 06:42:34AM -0400, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Jun 2026 12:26:06 +0200, Andy Shevchenko > > said: > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 02:54:02AM -0700, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > >> On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 10:52:57 +0200, Mika Westerberg > > >> said: > > >> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 05:42:02PM +0200, Marco Scardovi wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> The series adds explicit bounds checking for GPIO pin accesses and > > >> >> ensures safe handling of ACPI addresses in OperationRegion handlers, > > >> >> without referring to truncation or wrap-around behavior, which does > > >> >> not apply. > > >> > > > >> > I'm fine with these now. > > >> > > > >> > For both, > > >> > > > >> > Acked-by: Mika Westerberg > > >> > > >> Andy, Mika: do you want me to queue these directly for v7.2? > > > > > > I believe there is no hurry, but I have no objections if you pull it in. > > > > Your call, if you thknk these should wait until v7.3, I'll leave them for now. > > For the full consensus we need Mika's opinion :-) If we can get these for v7.2-rc2+ or so that would be good enough IMHO.