From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ua1-f53.google.com (mail-ua1-f53.google.com [209.85.222.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8837F3B8405 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2026 23:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.222.53 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787785668; cv=none; b=O5pyDfMcGiwB223DtFEar24PIqVZHlOovo9qBysahvc5XSvzlyaF19VhVZji9c3/FajnxrM6eZj0R2DTLM6GemJ/Lza4e6g0ee4qk+VIgYGOH1hrnesYl+0/Ex8VNjrqmYFwWKWaGrw6hHYp8qzhohXSeDUj2OSZx4T5ncnco9w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787785668; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6EgQ4h8sCnpkkI8smYfsOfZ3mX7SDEKGdmQqZFbaaew=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=WB2mm8K0bXIw5gDwD3WnhP2PLwVYX+YzSgYqowmJbOj12J06pIlXD7k5HyOuqf+XxfUGJiXB1EQyAzxtDJ726cL2BHI6spSN8D88Vpayh8HCIG6X6Zql1k9bYsJCSZJ0X9K/zk2Mfe/T1A/PhYDzL7WNwt2j6KlVmXM8EZNJgiI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=JUT3ie43; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.222.53 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="JUT3ie43" Received: by mail-ua1-f53.google.com with SMTP id a1e0cc1a2514c-97c7afa485bso821551241.3 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:07:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1787785666; x=1788390466; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=Xz31B2dhBshUWYNwR3Q8xs3ULxEyjpdBo/IUGet1XKc=; b=JUT3ie43578qIE7KBSwQLn7EiLFiVKUxt0x1CE4+SCmBrQ9UMVEU2pijWnNLN4BY21 KA08B9eDVoH5T1j9SBtQFHC3VmRbJWEZjTx5PwRgA3GIf+SXd/2Pd1GQo4S+MBSR1zIz kbJ48M/lYa9SVvigfZITPwfipZrK4K9h1nxAs+yZXkMDzc0PFOmGzxPTals/e2Eiiytu fXHhq6rV1w5EnOvRbAeJFc3013bb4tCTN0ildRQGhg+AU7LBQglOMP9YO7zbrRfbM+bq mfX6WY8WyYVw8URW89zTto1VhLQCvHlSQ9+kRkP/cCyySEpuO6k1rSZLAi3CKp2RenmX ljUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1787785666; x=1788390466; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=Xz31B2dhBshUWYNwR3Q8xs3ULxEyjpdBo/IUGet1XKc=; b=q/44xiY8xafDRgUHJnt8xmmoMggWmVaPD3KHgjAQazDS9HaWoQOqCJxUkcuxDpCFw1 yfNpglEjOzsRZjwf/3UkRZ+3CWKOntbrbCnMLy94RYHmpy7Pv5ZxQcAaMQMcBx7OpgmI BBQRN/2Xe59/QX7Gv8NWvFs9O+o03Wb/+85NGgoriTlZ/GJ0UEDRRTGpJPnIPIcyB6ZO szQoGjqFQHZWm/IzShFh8EayewJ6F2OcZxaqX1aNOd4A4fmoZoI8sGPRbv8BxxoPdFn3 uXVk5TEzlwGyV8VIXuJOoKCHwlAhtXL64iTgNkFbuF7DJcoY+DwGe8hP4CFJgeUYvg73 L5eQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+RofN9eUu9r+ft0sAWElzO1mCO3diB8pj3Y/qMhMrS9V5al2I8ddXi1cEXz2ENJCihzTBYqqtTVMPADK@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFuF++nx95wR940sxmX0H+BZujkPo0yhbJzQg9M6aLdq0RSPATVb7WmJ 7ZZwz0jXTOAaAr6eRxvMLxwDez0IID/bRqnkgMuqHfSOUmFQ1vX7OlxUv/CM2bcs X-Gm-Gg: AR+sD11HlH1zm7yWaNx3cHZUIL71SF45klJdhN3Gs+Py8jfXviMPkWvcpx1Oce731XP 9FcLWTT9kU6h9gPePsyZodNk2BiRON+vA7A63Ic1VzehL6uFIiWibUMs+Se0wjfp9o1I2GYHMd+ wp7zoYpeGT8QyywqFEeEy1ibUYlvZJjrSTBRmzq4BaA+LPT4nvOqUY820XVSFEmMY0qS+EbEjlY oWlF/LuUDvjINWetEUmt9j3QN+itrU71opJ4k1ENy/C6lDMNhpw6qXZtXj80h4ZEo4VTpoAjBG8 5kTlyiY4Uf/RwU5bXNmr3aoGJTYYcUA3TMOhrj0/PCHtPmtAl2fnKv7LJHzri4RlvkYanYc92mf Q1Lg+VebW/r17cudx+nLG6CuLWD9BY1rm8Kq6XAOjNCJSQOXjKQPaQgEn7XAO35xFWZVf3jTf/D A7ZBJL3Xm6U+Ts32hLJMs9PsJQbktALCWN5ujZKc3w2IzDmgzcXZwUCtjZ+MtfYDVNBLkXN1Q09 On/eW8MoEFsDxHFP00gu/vcO0kSTevTeippWa2uDGCUrgjPDyrFy0hn1vjMkr5ePuRA1UwSVcFH Mdrg0Qk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:162a:b0:77b:28c1:210e with SMTP id ada2fe7eead31-782bf9bca7cmr4267611137.1.1787785666335; Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:07:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MaquinaLab.. ([179.179.239.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a1e0cc1a2514c-97cbe0ae5d2sm3311701241.2.2026.08.26.16.07.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:07:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Vinicius Pedrosa To: Andre Przywara Cc: Linus Walleij , Chen-Yu Tsai , Samuel Holland , Jernej Skrabec , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] pinctrl: sunxi: Allwinner A733 support Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 20:07:16 -0300 Message-ID: <20260826230720.466026-1-vinicius.eduardo.pedrosa@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20250821004232.8134-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> References: <20250821004232.8134-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Andre, This series no longer applies to mainline. Patch 1/9 fails on current master (45c13f3f9e3b), for two separate reasons - one of them from outside the series, which is why I am reporting it rather than just fixing it locally. Applying the series in order: [RFC PATCH 1/9] pinctrl: sunxi: rename SUNXI_PINCTRL_NEW_REG_LAYOUT error: patch failed: drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c:1521 error: patch failed: drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.h:88 The blocking one is your own patch 2/9. It merged as 42e06688c6cb ("pinctrl: sunxi: pass down flags to pinctrl routines") without 1/9, so sunxi_pinctrl_init_with_flags() now reads pctl->flags = flags; where 1/9 still expects pctl->variant = flags & SUNXI_PINCTRL_VARIANT_MASK; as context. A 3-way merge does not resolve it - both sides touch adjacent lines, so it conflicts. The second is unrelated to your work. 70f8915ea4e9 ("pinctrl: sunxi: fix gpiochip_lock_as_irq() failure when pinmux is unknown") inserted SUN4I_FUNC_DISABLED_OLD/NEW into 1/9's header hunk context, and added a fifth use of SUNXI_PINCTRL_NEW_REG_LAYOUT, in sunxi_pinctrl_irq_request_resources(). The header hunk merges cleanly with -3, but that new use is not covered by the rename, so the tree then fails to build with an undeclared identifier. Patches 3/9 through 9/9 apply cleanly once 1/9 is resolved. Static reproduction only - no A733 hardware here, so nothing in this message says anything about whether the series works. I am not sending a rebase: which shape 1/9 should take now that 2/9 is in is your call. Vinicius