From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mta0.migadu.com (out-197.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BA8E12B94 for ; Sun, 4 Oct 2026 05:48:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.197 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791092912; cv=none; b=B+Y98qgu/M9CIJvVFDtUQ/nLLshcOjbMIrl47pfVNwyfJZMD+Dsqtjzc1uMGMLiKKVpI+ZFz1If7lm82A+vY1wEqj0uNAIsGA6oOK3gpSxErEANC2THxIynGwQRyWeNcScQOrF1CI1n2gtiNk4Du8G0olY5kO3bhaqTaaaBHXGM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791092912; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kA/0ZRcsInKEz1O5HLXQCbexw69M1ReXszXBjKEpfzM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kJy/BXaaDrYUv28Msqfo5cvxcisiaB2Ca8Mqs8CFSz/290Rcnv3JNCQ2tjY+0d0ZryfQqUY8qG1LXz0IZv1Whv4lrNX3zYwAQhwOdjnHNYxDgBDVNO8xPxV8ziKdthv5GJUGkmlA01E9IfYW4t+xoyLCbVdDaJouskTXWcnJs2A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=ft7N4p2F; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.197 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="ft7N4p2F" X-Envelope-To: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=kA/0ZRcsInKEz1O5HLXQCbexw69M1ReXszXBjKEpfzM=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1791092907; v=1; x=1791697707; b=ft7N4p2F0eMJdPReAvsSm5Lta3lnFPtARYO0h/Mvqhin5IYX9lNgYPoLjpga69KTdU20dlZs 9soBZsL3P0yHSIwUXYTiPj938yozmKQOYdPdGfOVkUDUAXvYgL1xLjWRLmiTFIALKZBqbPNN04L 1Kg49EsLIcyYkBsEYMIKxcNQ= X-Envelope-To: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Received: by smtp.migadu.com with ESMTPS id ae07ef5e9ef0dcf3; Sun, 04 Oct 2026 05:48:17 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: ae07ef5e9ef0dcf3 X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT From: Junjie Cao To: andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com Cc: brgl@kernel.org, linusw@kernel.org, ptyser@xes-inc.com, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, junjie.cao@linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/5] gpio: Move Intel PCH type of GPIO drivers to the intel subfolder Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2026 05:48:09 +0000 Message-ID: <20261004054809.24211-1-junjie.cao@linux.dev> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20260925160913.1648565-4-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> References: <20260925160913.1648565-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20260925160913.1648565-4-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Andy, One small note: moving GPIO_ICH under "if PCI" also excludes its existing COMPILE_TEST && HAS_IOPORT path when PCI=n. I checked that gpio-ich.o builds with W=1 in that configuration before the move. Could we keep GPIO_ICH outside the PCI conditional to preserve that coverage? Thanks, Junjie