From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] pinctrl: rockchip: add missing of_node_put
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 22:20:02 +0100
Message-ID: <2055001.xH02id89et@diego>
References: <1450715988-4770-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
 <1450715988-4770-5-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-rockchip-bounces+glpar-linux-rockchip=m.gmane.org-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <1450715988-4770-5-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall-L2FTfq7BK8M@public.gmane.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-rockchip>,
 <mailto:linux-rockchip-request-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rockchip/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-rockchip-request-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip>,
 <mailto:linux-rockchip-request-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: "Linux-rockchip" <linux-rockchip-bounces-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+glpar-linux-rockchip=m.gmane.org-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall-L2FTfq7BK8M@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, kernel-janitors-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-gpio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org

Hi Julia,

Am Montag, 21. Dezember 2015, 17:39:47 schrieb Julia Lawall:
> for_each_child_of_node performs an of_node_get on each iteration, so a
> return from the loop requires an of_node_put.
> 
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that fixes this problem is as
> follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):
> 
> // <smpl>
> @@
> local idexpression n;
> expression e,e1;
> @@
> 
>  for_each_child_of_node(e1,n) {
>    ...
> (
>    of_node_put(n);
> 
>    e = n
> 
>    return n;
> 
> +  of_node_put(n);
> ?  return ...;
> )
>    ...
>  }
> // </smpl>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall-L2FTfq7BK8M@public.gmane.org>

thanks for catching this :-)

I still remember how we talked about that same issue in the phy driver and the 
things for_each_child_of_node does when running, so

Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>


Thanks
Heiko