From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: I2C OF IRQ parsing issue due to probe ordering
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 15:12:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2475312.fxdzhGkprr@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141030130207.GB19386@ulmo>
Hi Thierry,
On Thursday 30 October 2014 14:02:09 Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 02:53:42PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday 27 October 2014 13:58:19 Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > > The i2c@e6520000 node is probed before the gpio@e6051000 node. The
> > > > of_i2c_register_devices() function tries to register all children,
> > > > including hdmi@39. It tries to parse and map the I2C client IRQ by
> > > > calling irq_of_parse_and_map(), which returns 0 as the interrupt
> > > > controller isn't probed yet. The adv7511 driver later probes the
> > > > hdmi@39
> > > > device and gets client->irq set to 0.
> > >
> > > I've got this strange feeling of deja vu... Ah, here: Thierry Reding
> >
> > > tackled this problem a year ago. His series:
> > Thanks for the pointer.
> >
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/16/111 (of/irq: Defer interrupt reference
> > > resolution)
> > >
> > > He did a V2 (which never made it to the i2c list). Seems like the first
> > > two patches made it and the rest got stalled without discussion?
> > >
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/18/216
> > >
> > > Adding Thierry to the queue. Maybe he can bring some light to what
> > > happened to his series.
> >
> > That's exactly what I need :-) Thierry, do you plan to respin the series ?
>
> Not really. Like I said in my reply to Wolfram, a different set of
> patches was merged subsequently to solve this issue for platform
> devices, which makes my patchset mostly obsolete. But I think the
> solution that you proposed would work well if you do:
>
> - int irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(dev->of_node, 0);
> + int irq = of_irq_get(dev->of_node, 0);
>
> And then changing irq_create_of_mapping() should no longer be necessary.
It looks like it would work, yes. I'll test it and will resubmit my patch.
> I still think it's kind of lame to handle -EPROBE_DEFER specially as was
> done in of_irq_get(), but given how worried people were about the more
> invasive changes needed to propagate the correct error code all the way
> up it seems like that's as good as it's going to get.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-30 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-25 22:13 I2C OF IRQ parsing issue due to probe ordering Laurent Pinchart
2014-10-27 12:58 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-30 12:53 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-10-30 13:02 ` Thierry Reding
2014-10-30 13:12 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2014-10-30 12:56 ` Thierry Reding
2014-10-30 13:05 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-10-30 13:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-10-30 13:22 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-10-30 13:43 ` Thierry Reding
2014-10-30 11:58 ` Ezequiel Garcia
[not found] ` <545227E4.5070507-30ULvvUtt6G51wMPkGsGjgyUoB5FGQPZ@public.gmane.org>
2014-10-30 12:15 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2475312.fxdzhGkprr@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox