From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] ARM: shmobile: sh73a0 dtsi: Add missing "gpio-ranges" to gpio node Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 12:48:37 +0300 Message-ID: <2477426.ekHmTUkfBY@avalon> References: <1435650327-2542-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <1435650327-2542-4-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1435650327-2542-4-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot , Simon Horman , Magnus Damm , Maxime Ripard , Boris Brezillon , Benoit Parrot , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Hi Geert, Thank you for the patch. On Tuesday 30 June 2015 09:45:23 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > If a GPIO driver uses gpiochip_add_pin_range() (which is usually the > case for GPIO/PFC combos), the GPIO hogging mechanism configured from DT > doesn't work: > > requesting hog GPIO led1-high (chip sh73a0_pfc, offset 20) failed > > The actual error code is -517 == -EPROBE_DEFER. > > The problem is that PFC+GPIO registration is handled in multiple steps: > 1. pinctrl_register(), > 2. gpiochip_add(), > 3. gpiochip_add_pin_range(). > > Configuration of the hogs is handled in gpiochip_add(): > > gpiochip_add > of_gpiochip_add > of_gpiochip_scan_hogs > gpiod_hog > gpiochip_request_own_desc > __gpiod_request > chip->request > pinctrl_request_gpio > pinctrl_get_device_gpio_range > > However, at this point the GPIO controller hasn't been added to > pinctrldev_list yet, so the range can't be found, and the operation fails > with -EPROBE_DEFER. > > To fix this, add a "gpio-ranges" property to the gpio device node, so > the ranges are added by of_gpiochip_add_pin_range(), which is called by > of_gpiochip_add() before the call to of_gpiochip_scan_hogs(). > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven This looks sane to me, even though referencing the same DT node seems a bit dodgy. I'll let Linus comment on that, but for the implementation itself, Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi > index 11e17c5f26e2cae2..ff7c8f298f30a58d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi > @@ -392,6 +392,9 @@ > <0xe605801c 0x1c>; > gpio-controller; > #gpio-cells = <2>; > + gpio-ranges = > + <&pfc 0 0 119>, <&pfc 128 128 37>, <&pfc 192 192 91>, > + <&pfc 288 288 22>; > interrupts-extended = > <&irqpin0 0 0>, <&irqpin0 1 0>, <&irqpin0 2 0>, <&irqpin0 3 0>, > <&irqpin0 4 0>, <&irqpin0 5 0>, <&irqpin0 6 0>, <&irqpin0 7 0>, -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart