From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A44C77B6C for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 13:18:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230206AbjC2NSB (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2023 09:18:01 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40050 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230183AbjC2NR7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2023 09:17:59 -0400 Received: from madras.collabora.co.uk (madras.collabora.co.uk [46.235.227.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2724644B4; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 06:17:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (2-237-20-237.ip236.fastwebnet.it [2.237.20.237]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by madras.collabora.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 647C96603171; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 14:17:53 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1680095874; bh=+a9nJ+Gmk+pTlbG1fRUJCo0aSMEq658EZ0Tl+tG2DfA=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=AzFC/TmqJxEoXH3Cau8jnLBeCmKloH+ObTtbEfNVWxJy8M4/vzZUriFx8QiSymWxk 28xk6LdhKdyFjinEUhohWO97A/ofpp4JdwGkPXWS+2/qPQ4QBnJTm+J34BDNK2pRbs sryrGhXxE/ArMZyK8PXv77bgjGhYVjAwxxURsmFHE4nz1Red9ZBUC8ZTE5e5wGkdAx 6w/OTSwX9Rk+AiS+httMUa/yctqNdM8mVB9umd7d6GT72HJPMK2SnBNbH5W6mYEtZ7 oPl5FLMOF7fWDtANYVX9bG8PQHMfVpHGDLyyopEKt9Iaf6gVebmrikTIP08iEZQkUA 1wRGIcv4+RlSQ== Message-ID: <2e9748fd-2c47-60fb-8c8e-05bb1a2896c5@collabora.com> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 15:17:51 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/17] arm64: dts: mediatek: Increase the size BL31 reserved memory Content-Language: en-US To: amergnat@baylibre.com, Wim Van Sebroeck , Guenter Roeck , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Matthias Brugger , Chaotian Jing , Ulf Hansson , Wenbin Mei , Linus Walleij , Zhiyong Tao , =?UTF-8?Q?Bernhard_Rosenkr=c3=a4nzer?= Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Bailon , Fabien Parent , Amjad Ouled-Ameur References: <20230203-evk-board-support-v3-0-0003e80e0095@baylibre.com> <20230203-evk-board-support-v3-3-0003e80e0095@baylibre.com> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno In-Reply-To: <20230203-evk-board-support-v3-3-0003e80e0095@baylibre.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Il 29/03/23 10:54, amergnat@baylibre.com ha scritto: > From: Alexandre Bailon > > The reserved size for BL31 is too small. > This has been highlighted by the MPU that now restrict access to BL31 > memory to secure world only. > This increase the size of the reserved memory. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Mergnat Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno