Re: [PATCH] Revert "pinctrl: intel: Split intel_pinctrl_add_padgroups() for better maintenance"

[Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>]

On 3/8/21 5:46 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 6:44 PM Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 3/8/21 5:31 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 05:35:59PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 04:25:05PM +0100, Maximilian Luz wrote:
>>>>> Following commit 036e126c72eb ("pinctrl: intel: Split
>>>>> intel_pinctrl_add_padgroups() for better maintenance"),
>>>>> gpiochip_get_desc() is broken on some Kaby Lake R devices (specifically
>>>>> a Microsoft Surface Book 2), returning -EINVAL for GPIOs that in reality
>>>>> should be there (they are defined in ACPI and have been accessible
>>>>> previously). Due to this, gpiod_get() fails with -ENOENT.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reverting this commit fixes that issue and the GPIOs in question are
>>>>> accessible again.
>>>>
>>>> I would like to have more information.
>>>> Can you enable PINCTRL and GPIO debug options in the kernel, and show dmesg
>>>> output (when kernel command line has 'ignore_loglevel' option) for both working
>>>> and non-working cases?
>>>>
>>>> Also if it's possible to have DSDT.dsl of the device in question along with
>>>> output of `grep -H 15 /sys/bus/acpi/devices/*/status`.
>>>>
>>>>> There is probably a better option than straight up reverting this, so
>>>>> consider this more of a bug-report.
>>>>
>>>> Indeed.
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you test if the below helps (probably you have to apply it by editing
>>> the file manually):
>>>
>>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
>>> @@ -1392,6 +1392,7 @@ static int intel_pinctrl_add_padgroups_by_size(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl,
>>>        gpps[i].size = min(gpp_size, npins);
>>>        npins -= gpps[i].size;
>>>
>>> +     gpps[i].gpio_base = gpps[i].base;
>>>        gpps[i].padown_num = padown_num;
>>>
>>>
>>
>> That does fix the issue! Thanks for the fast response and fix!
> 
> I'm about to send the formal patch. I will add the
> Reported-and-tested-by tag if you are okay with it.
> 

Sure thing.

Thanks,
Max