Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: baytrail: Fix selecting gpio pinctrl state

[Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>]

Hi,

On 4/6/24 3:52 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 3:37 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> For all the "score" pin-groups all the intel_pingroup-s to select
>> the non GPIO function are re-used for byt_score_gpio_groups[].
>>
>> But this is incorrect since a pin-group includes the mode setting,
>> which for the non GPIO functions generally is 1, where as to select
>> the GPIO function mode must be set to 0.
>>
>> So the GPIO function needs separate intel_pingroup-s with their own mode
>> value of 0.
>>
>> Add foo_gpio entries for each function to byt_score_groups[] and make all
>> the byt_score_gpio_groups[] entries point to these instead to fix this.
>>
>> The "sus" pin-groups got this correct until commit 2f46d7f7e959 ("pinctrl:
>> baytrail: Add pinconf group + function for the pmu_clk") added support for
>> the pmu_clk pins following the broken "score" model.
>>
>> Add pmu_clk?_grp_gpio entries to byt_sus_groups[] and point to those
>> in byt_sus_gpio_groups[] to fix this.
> 
> I'm wondering if it's possible to add some code to imply all these. I
> mean to have a comparator to the _gpio in the naming and generate them
> at runtime and add. In this case if we add / modify the original one
> the rest (for _gpio cases) will be done automatically.

Yes some better solution for this would be nice but I don't have time
to work on this, so I suggest to just move forward with this fix for now.

Regards,

Hans