linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
To: "Ricardo Ribalda Delgado" <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com>,
	"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"Alexandre Courbot" <gnurou@gmail.com>,
	"Michal Simek" <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
	"Sören Brinkmann" <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] gpio/xilinx: Remove offset property
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:18:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c4acafb6be84bf0a27f11b16d0309c3@BL2FFO11FD025.protection.gbl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1418217710-11987-2-git-send-email-ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com>

On 12/10/2014 02:21 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
> Instead of calculating the register offset per call, pre-calculate it on
> probe time.
> 
> Acked-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> v2: Add Acked-by 
> 
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c | 33 +++++++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
> index ba18b06..9483950 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
> @@ -50,7 +50,6 @@ struct xgpio_instance {
>  	struct of_mm_gpio_chip mmchip;
>  	u32 gpio_state;
>  	u32 gpio_dir;
> -	u32 offset;

when you remove offset property you should also remove offset from comment
above of this structure.

>  	spinlock_t gpio_lock;
>  };
>  
> @@ -65,12 +64,8 @@ struct xgpio_instance {
>  static int xgpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio)
>  {
>  	struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc = to_of_mm_gpio_chip(gc);
> -	struct xgpio_instance *chip =
> -	    container_of(mm_gc, struct xgpio_instance, mmchip);
>  
> -	void __iomem *regs = mm_gc->regs + chip->offset;
> -
> -	return !!(xgpio_readreg(regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET) & BIT(gpio));
> +	return !!(xgpio_readreg(mm_gc->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET) & BIT(gpio));
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -88,7 +83,6 @@ static void xgpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
>  	struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc = to_of_mm_gpio_chip(gc);
>  	struct xgpio_instance *chip =
>  	    container_of(mm_gc, struct xgpio_instance, mmchip);
> -	void __iomem *regs = mm_gc->regs;
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock, flags);
>  
> @@ -98,8 +92,7 @@ static void xgpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
>  	else
>  		chip->gpio_state &= ~BIT(gpio);
>  
> -	xgpio_writereg(regs + chip->offset + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET,
> -							 chip->gpio_state);
> +	xgpio_writereg(mm_gc->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET, chip->gpio_state);
>  
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock, flags);
>  }
> @@ -119,13 +112,12 @@ static int xgpio_dir_in(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio)
>  	struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc = to_of_mm_gpio_chip(gc);
>  	struct xgpio_instance *chip =
>  	    container_of(mm_gc, struct xgpio_instance, mmchip);
> -	void __iomem *regs = mm_gc->regs;
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock, flags);
>  
>  	/* Set the GPIO bit in shadow register and set direction as input */
>  	chip->gpio_dir |= BIT(gpio);
> -	xgpio_writereg(regs + chip->offset + XGPIO_TRI_OFFSET, chip->gpio_dir);
> +	xgpio_writereg(mm_gc->regs + XGPIO_TRI_OFFSET, chip->gpio_dir);
>  
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock, flags);
>  
> @@ -148,7 +140,6 @@ static int xgpio_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
>  	struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc = to_of_mm_gpio_chip(gc);
>  	struct xgpio_instance *chip =
>  	    container_of(mm_gc, struct xgpio_instance, mmchip);
> -	void __iomem *regs = mm_gc->regs;
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->gpio_lock, flags);
>  
> @@ -157,12 +148,11 @@ static int xgpio_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int gpio, int val)
>  		chip->gpio_state |= BIT(gpio);
>  	else
>  		chip->gpio_state &= ~BIT(gpio);
> -	xgpio_writereg(regs + chip->offset + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET,
> -		       chip->gpio_state);
> +	xgpio_writereg(mm_gc->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET, chip->gpio_state);
>  
>  	/* Clear the GPIO bit in shadow register and set direction as output */
>  	chip->gpio_dir &= ~BIT(gpio);
> -	xgpio_writereg(regs + chip->offset + XGPIO_TRI_OFFSET, chip->gpio_dir);
> +	xgpio_writereg(mm_gc->regs + XGPIO_TRI_OFFSET, chip->gpio_dir);
>  
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->gpio_lock, flags);
>  
> @@ -178,10 +168,8 @@ static void xgpio_save_regs(struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc)
>  	struct xgpio_instance *chip =
>  	    container_of(mm_gc, struct xgpio_instance, mmchip);
>  
> -	xgpio_writereg(mm_gc->regs + chip->offset + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET,
> -							chip->gpio_state);
> -	xgpio_writereg(mm_gc->regs + chip->offset + XGPIO_TRI_OFFSET,
> -							 chip->gpio_dir);
> +	xgpio_writereg(mm_gc->regs + XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET,	chip->gpio_state);
> +	xgpio_writereg(mm_gc->regs + XGPIO_TRI_OFFSET, chip->gpio_dir);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -247,9 +235,6 @@ static int xgpio_of_probe(struct device_node *np)
>  		if (!chip)
>  			return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -		/* Add dual channel offset */
> -		chip->offset = XGPIO_CHANNEL_OFFSET;
> -
>  		/* Update GPIO state shadow register with default value */
>  		of_property_read_u32(np, "xlnx,dout-default-2",
>  				     &chip->gpio_state);
> @@ -285,6 +270,10 @@ static int xgpio_of_probe(struct device_node *np)
>  			np->full_name, status);
>  			return status;
>  		}
> +
> +		/* Add dual channel offset */
> +		chip->mmchip.regs += XGPIO_CHANNEL_OFFSET;
> +
>  		pr_info("XGpio: %s: dual channel registered, base is %d\n",
>  					np->full_name, chip->mmchip.gc.base);
>  	}
> 

Thanks,
Michal

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-10 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-10 13:21 [PATCH v2 0/3] Add support for PCI mapped devices and rmmod Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2014-12-10 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] gpio/xilinx: Remove offset property Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2014-12-10 14:18   ` Michal Simek [this message]
2014-12-10 14:25     ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2014-12-10 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] gpio/xilinx: Convert the driver to platform device interface Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2014-12-10 14:36   ` Michal Simek
2014-12-10 15:15     ` Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2014-12-10 13:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] gpio/xilinx: Add support for X86 Arch Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
2014-12-10 14:38   ` Michal Simek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3c4acafb6be84bf0a27f11b16d0309c3@BL2FFO11FD025.protection.gbl \
    --to=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com \
    --cc=soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).