From: Aleksandr Mishin <amishin@t-argos.ru>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
"Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com>, <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <"<lvc-project"@linuxtesting.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: davinci: Fix potential buffer overflow
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 19:23:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3fac7a3d-cd8a-4367-8ad7-206b850d2e41@t-argos.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b2c6bc3e-11c5-4a20-8a30-666821ab2613@intel.com>
28.03.2024 18:27, Alexander Lobakin пишет:
> From: Aleksandr Mishin <amishin@t-argos.ru>
> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:10:21 +0300
>
>> In davinci_gpio_probe() accessing an element of array 'chips->regs' of size 5 and
>> array 'offset_array' of size 5 can lead to a buffer overflow, since the index
>> 'bank' can have an out of range value 63.
>> Fix this bug by limiting top index value.
>>
>> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>>
>> Fixes: c809e37a3b5a ("gpio: davinci: Allocate the correct amount of memory for controller")
>> Signed-off-by: Aleksandr Mishin <amishin@t-argos.ru>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
>> index bb499e362912..b65df1f2b83f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
>> @@ -257,6 +257,9 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> spin_lock_init(&chips->lock);
>>
>> nbank = DIV_ROUND_UP(ngpio, 32);
>> + if (nbank > MAX_REGS_BANKS || nbank > 5) {
>> + nbank = MAX_REGS_BANKS < 5 ? MAX_REGS_BANKS : 5;
>> + }
>
> Static analysis warnings make no sense until you provide a reliable way
> to trigger the problem on real systems.
>
>> for (bank = 0; bank < nbank; bank++)
>> chips->regs[bank] = gpio_base + offset_array[bank];
>>
>
> Thanks,
> Olek
>
I can only see the code at this time. And I see the following:
1. In some configurations CONFIG_ARCH_NR_GPIO value is 2048. So nbank
value can be 64.
2. Previously, a patch was proposed that removes restrictions on the
number of GPIOs
(https://lore.kernel.org/all/cb540a9d73cad36d288664f8b275c6308a4a3168.1662116601.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu/).
--
Kind regards
Aleksandr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-28 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-28 9:10 [PATCH] gpio: davinci: Fix potential buffer overflow Aleksandr Mishin
2024-03-28 10:32 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-03-28 15:27 ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-03-28 16:23 ` Aleksandr Mishin [this message]
2024-03-28 16:32 ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-03-28 16:45 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3fac7a3d-cd8a-4367-8ad7-206b850d2e41@t-argos.ru \
--to=amishin@t-argos.ru \
--cc="<lvc-project"@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=afd@ti.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox