From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04D733BE65F; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 08:17:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781511425; cv=none; b=Z+K7XO+Z41mRU+wkoVjHQOUk44MZ/fW+Sx5Ata5boarh/fBG+kLbkfPk3Qnw5ZX4bzjvuHTOH9MuZalMxvimKwZuQixGefj2lYdMjaThqTTeTmoqRSF4jMmQTGxNS1WJXicW8niu/sRYaQaSYiMR5SUFDzmw04eUOU9VfdsScOY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781511425; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8eyhlRIj8sWtROsfnlZnpmAb9R6mFe7bid6T9bEOvC8=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:From:To:Cc:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Wkm9aVikMGQ+d6nWAOHHAQP00OESj8IkU08wvQ1/+qrfzGGhlq4//ySpDsnJUI3+kxqx6P2hn2LjUivHwLilzg9xsA/vWIXAjVvn/lr91pIc2OS57osXZG8N2owKeKQ+j6guJKnc5TUS6YYxbl8lQFxS/OlxCckGITJ2kRdmUfE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Biu4IkOD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Biu4IkOD" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 721151F000E9; Mon, 15 Jun 2026 08:16:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1781511423; bh=aH0o7nWDQT6KV9saGoM0jvsLIafJzmaBf4bhSqCtANs=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To; b=Biu4IkODwpBcr+U/99U7lwrDVYfvGocIpBerQgK4X95YFyOYeuSbM4KdwZr7cJROz gjlLH2yHFHfG3uy67alqdVM8q+vJSHXnz8ayg6fs7SbMmwomyIOtbJf1ncaiO7lL1a i6E7yoqDShUBJO8DzW2JqMB4pg7CoCLUqDn3SksGMoc51hXpwKuuwpAHkG+e4uRNFM UePo4g6fts7bkpyCuFfikeZsjRX4u19b+VmUp24A6JH01cXUUa0k/xih+TKiL4SmVs braHK3PxxAf477vEg8VyeudilrdcpJhw/JOInESoNaVnMYFw+ByQN/9y4wAfPfNyEt 1N4S659lRqCrw== Message-ID: <419fe57b-fed0-411d-8bd6-eb452e767784@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 10:16:57 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Samsung Exynos8855 SoC From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Alim Akhtar , 'Linus Walleij' Cc: peter.griffin@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, hajun.sung@samsung.com References: <20260612163020.411761-1-alim.akhtar@samsung.com> <20260612163020.411761-6-alim.akhtar@samsung.com> <007a01dcfc9d$aa94dd60$ffbe9820$@samsung.com> <0aa74645-d99d-4776-b3e6-e74fc0528f11@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US Autocrypt: addr=krzk@kernel.org; keydata= xsFNBFVDQq4BEAC6KeLOfFsAvFMBsrCrJ2bCalhPv5+KQF2PS2+iwZI8BpRZoV+Bd5kWvN79 cFgcqTTuNHjAvxtUG8pQgGTHAObYs6xeYJtjUH0ZX6ndJ33FJYf5V3yXqqjcZ30FgHzJCFUu JMp7PSyMPzpUXfU12yfcRYVEMQrmplNZssmYhiTeVicuOOypWugZKVLGNm0IweVCaZ/DJDIH gNbpvVwjcKYrx85m9cBVEBUGaQP6AT7qlVCkrf50v8bofSIyVa2xmubbAwwFA1oxoOusjPIE J3iadrwpFvsZjF5uHAKS+7wHLoW9hVzOnLbX6ajk5Hf8Pb1m+VH/E8bPBNNYKkfTtypTDUCj NYcd27tjnXfG+SDs/EXNUAIRefCyvaRG7oRYF3Ec+2RgQDRnmmjCjoQNbFrJvJkFHlPeHaeS BosGY+XWKydnmsfY7SSnjAzLUGAFhLd/XDVpb1Een2XucPpKvt9ORF+48gy12FA5GduRLhQU vK4tU7ojoem/G23PcowM1CwPurC8sAVsQb9KmwTGh7rVz3ks3w/zfGBy3+WmLg++C2Wct6nM Pd8/6CBVjEWqD06/RjI2AnjIq5fSEH/BIfXXfC68nMp9BZoy3So4ZsbOlBmtAPvMYX6U8VwD TNeBxJu5Ex0Izf1NV9CzC3nNaFUYOY8KfN01X5SExAoVTr09ewARAQABzSVLcnp5c3p0b2Yg S296bG93c2tpIDxrcnprQGtlcm5lbC5vcmc+wsGPBBMBCgA5AhsDBgsJCAcDAgYVCAIJCgsE FgIDAQIeAQIXgBYhBJvQfg4MUfjVlne3VBuTQ307QWKbBQJp2mE8AAoJEBuTQ307QWKbeaIP /ihHTkTW4KsN/DQ945JJbyu5tI0J80Wue7QyyLPglyKfhgb5cLLNPpOC8cCIJsc7+W3i2P38 s2c1cOH6CYGE7E9ur3Vfme8NW2S2I/Z8VC7bZnzyS23wT17LrsdS/qCpx4o8U+pt/xdXDKph EGRYrIEmMpUWvyYzyYKGIe25FtaayIIKpq8eZYyFcp2f/sG5IkOW5uZzHPMPdcm87jU7fyuQ rAU2vx9r+ulUfQ/q9Z2roC/ode3l7t2pN7BCBCsUDp6JCrUyZrtT1e7EbA0ZRP3aOBNk2P2E DQOgJGjGdO5Yx2Y9LFtltu6JbsBJHi1syGRX3AtQYOMc4Y1WGoeZJmMlvKj2ZqqXNkcWi2DS IQEWB0uW6CqFsBBIMGDa+6OzdaVO/uAVXWDWml02Men3CILdI1MbVjoh8ECqYUY7OQ+JJvNN vnliuq5WM3Ghd3jg/LZZrxXjdIginRHFQCjIJYLKpLZWm1/iDFedcfzqRNYmTtqscdCNHW41 oT3Z7BmO9xwdjuwBS6nmS6JJwkbf5Ot2QR4pB/DRU7ZwjT1qHe+9r9gF32wXVQatHNGK/VVu sfwOnkdxCWkp/qb2gdQRmZh+SedStWshigH6sNfuHBloF/q+hjMRc8b2m326OZdrbSHwY1Sz vti8Hn7n8NjdHO9LKB7BIdjkA9DA5WsqOuVCzsFNBFVDXDQBEADNkrQYSREUL4D3Gws46JEo Z9HEQOKtkrwjrzlw/tCmqVzERRPvz2Xg8n7+HRCrgqnodIYoUh5WsU84N03KlLueMNsWLJBv BaubYN4JuJIdRr4dS4oyF1/fQAQPHh8Thpiz0SAZFx6iWKB7Qrz3OrGCjTPcW6eiOMheesVS 5hxietSmlin+SilmIAPZHx7n242u6kdHOh+/SyLImKn/dh9RzatVpUKbv34eP1wAGldWsRxb f3WP9pFNObSzI/Bo3kA89Xx2rO2roC+Gq4LeHvo7ptzcLcrqaHUAcZ3CgFG88CnA6z6lBZn0 WyewEcPOPdcUB2Q7D/NiUY+HDiV99rAYPJztjeTrBSTnHeSBPb+qn5ZZGQwIdUW9YegxWKvX XHTwB5eMzo/RB6vffwqcnHDoe0q7VgzRRZJwpi6aMIXLfeWZ5Wrwaw2zldFuO4Dt91pFzBSO IpeMtfgb/Pfe/a1WJ/GgaIRIBE+NUqckM+3zJHGmVPqJP/h2Iwv6nw8U+7Yyl6gUBLHFTg2h YnLFJI4Xjg+AX1hHFVKmvl3VBHIsBv0oDcsQWXqY+NaFahT0lRPjYtrTa1v3tem/JoFzZ4B0 p27K+qQCF2R96hVvuEyjzBmdq2esyE6zIqftdo4MOJho8uctOiWbwNNq2U9pPWmu4vXVFBYI GmpyNPYzRm0QPwARAQABwsF2BBgBCgAgAhsMFiEEm9B+DgxR+NWWd7dUG5NDfTtBYpsFAmna YUkACgkQG5NDfTtBYptX+BAApg32CkxwNucNEi8WfWA8oKkW0y8YDuY6ORMo9FWNGiT/OTy0 vyJrLocrpn86zwfjVp+eCrssPYh8eqJfnWqmYv6ACQtHPYzPZQ3mSo8H97Z01oUxITzCxpXm ZkLgPIqtDPcC2E3dPM/fVxcyowM8XsaMA9wcsaUYrta8toOq2b9tKcjleKMfMrm0gQ9u7wUc QbLkwj6TCLOwucb07GXzLTNF9PZmaDUpKAZjMjmrW+le+SFvQbhamx0rxLWPR0NWntXpbCn+ +ACch03p/JyTBVktxFsFyCt7pTPE1kEaeuXBTe/a2D9iQvRxRW19LvuO2e59/u1wYUiH/orz wbIC2S4dBsPAPihL3ztOU1yE86GPyQtSE0kU+/7snnLt4QGi6PChf3t5gnNjAzjUUovO8rgI c+5yN5heq5loYHgK6OQ9OlHzsPHO9e9MOQcKlFycs1pyijFGzDwdNUm/SchK8iWT2QApTx4A K9bCVaboTA2T77QYkRcRJYSsO1alGX0ome/hMLD1daXlkrNUp1HWa3K4iytLRXjCSIorWiGs n+q3krnpXu3TFkA8qtOFZMdnIiFuiq1yLT8hptsV5xh1TA2nsVvSYiaCr3q4s4BKjS/KrLDb qoxzw8ISjdUp4pA85vb6YLCmb39NgidD+7PmAr65lBNveIFynTgsja1rRQ4= In-Reply-To: <0aa74645-d99d-4776-b3e6-e74fc0528f11@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 15/06/2026 10:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 15/06/2026 10:04, Alim Akhtar wrote: >> Thanks Linus for your review >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Linus Walleij >>> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2026 12:51 PM >>> To: Alim Akhtar >>> Cc: krzk@kernel.org; peter.griffin@linaro.org; robh@kernel.org; >>> conor+dt@kernel.org; linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux- >>> kernel@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux- >>> gpio@vger.kernel.org; hajun.sung@samsung.com >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Samsung Exynos8855 >>> SoC >>> >>> Hi Alim, >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2026 at 6:11 PM Alim Akhtar >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Add maintainers entry for the Samsung Exynos8855 SoC based platforms >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar >>> (...) >>>> +SAMSUNG EXYNOS8855 SoC SUPPORT >>>> +M: Alim Akhtar >>>> +L: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non- >>> subscribers) >>>> +L: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org >>>> +S: Maintained >>>> +F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos8855* >>> >>> If you really want to single out a single platform like this (and I don't even >>> know if that is a good idea... how do you keep the big picture in mind?) you >>> should probably want to also add a wildcard for all the >>> 8855 device tree files. >>> >> I am also not sure, just followed what was done historically, other Exynos8855 file will get added once they >> are posted for review, e.g. clock driver. >> Let me discuss with Krzk during OSS (Mumbai) and see how do we handle this or any other better ways. >> > > You are Alim already reviewer for entire Samsung, so not sure if this is > beneficial but I also do not mind. > > For Exynos850 and Google GS101, these were added because folks wanted to > be involved in these specific bits. In the past I was voting for per-DTS > file maintainer entry and rejecting per-board maintainer entries. There Lemme clarify: "voting for in-DTS file maintainer entry", so like we have for DT bindings, which lists maintainers. > was even get_maintainers.pl patch doing that. Unfortunately after many > tries that patch eventually did not land and I got bored bringing it up, > thus I agreed to earlier NXP approach for per-board or per-SoC maintainers. > > I would like to encourage more people doing meaningful reviews, so if > having maintainers entry helps that, then I am in. > > Therefore I am fine with this patch as is. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof Best regards, Krzysztof