From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: mach-s5p: get rid of all headers Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 08:50:04 +0200 Message-ID: <4393612.d5qsoYg5L1@wuerfel> References: <1401888838-3126-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <1401888838-3126-3-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <4544212.mqY6dSouMv@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.13]:51140 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751969AbaFFGuk (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2014 02:50:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4544212.mqY6dSouMv@wuerfel> Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot On Wednesday 04 June 2014 15:58:28 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 04 June 2014 15:33:56 Linus Walleij wrote: > > This renames all the local headers in the S5P platforms > > to indicating a scope local to this platform, > > and cuts the implicit inclusion of from > > by removing the use of NEED_MACH_GPIO_H from all S5P variants. > > > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij > > > > Hmm, this patch will obviously clash with the removal of S5p64xx > and s5pc100. It shouldn't be hard to resolve the conflict when we > merge both into arm-soc/next/cleanup, but maybe there is a way to > avoid it? Nevermind, given how happy everyone is to see this gone, let's go ahead with your current version, and let us handle the conflict in arm-soc when we merge both patch sets. Arnd