From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] gpio: Add ROHM BD9571MWV-M PMIC GPIO driver Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:33:30 +0200 Message-ID: <4c5e1df7-bde3-a18c-a6db-4a3ae0de2174@gmail.com> References: <20170424152130.32410-1-marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com> <20170424152130.32410-3-marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com> <20170425122144.lxeuxohwg2rnw3zn@dell> <4710b052-0634-5779-4dcf-3523ced709f4@gmail.com> <20170425140113.vnvhyhdgymcnm3tt@dell> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170425140113.vnvhyhdgymcnm3tt@dell> Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lee Jones Cc: Linus Walleij , Linux-Renesas , Marek Vasut , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Geert Uytterhoeven List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On 04/25/2017 04:01 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> On 04/25/2017 02:21 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> >>>> On 04/25/2017 11:32 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Add driver for the GPIO block in the ROHM BD9571MWV-W MFD PMIC. >>>>>> This block is pretty trivial and supports setting GPIO direction >>>>>> as Input/Output and in case of Output, supports setting value. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut >>>>>> Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org >>>>>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven >>>>>> Cc: Linus Walleij >>>>>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij >>>>>> --- >>>>>> V2: Use linux/gpio/driver.h instead of linux/gpio.h >>>>> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij >>>>> >>>>> Are you merging this through MFD? >>>> >>>> I thought that was a question for Lee initially , IMO it'd make sense if >>>> this went through one tree. >>> >>> Because your mailer is broken, I know have no idea which thread this >>> mail belongs to. Please fix your mailer to reply 'threaded'. >> >> You just were not on CC for the whole series, just the MFD part, >> probably that was the mistake, sorry. PW links below: > > Okay, understood. > >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9696589/ >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9696591/ >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9696597/ >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9696593/ > > This is not the way we do business. We? > If you want me to take them (and > there is a suitable reason for me to do so i.e. a build-time > dependency), then you're going to have to submit them again as > [RESEND]s with me in Cc. Done -- Best regards, Marek Vasut