linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: rcar: Support both edge trigger with DT
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 18:38:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52882C39.2050505@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1678796.qQvoAN1bBU@avalon>

Hi Laurent,

>> According to ANSI C, you can't initialize struct with empty { }. You
>> would need at least one 0 inside.
>> Despite gcc accepts it, there are some ppl over there trying kernel
>> with different compilers :)
>>
>> (Hope I'm not being too nitpicky)
> 
> You're certainly not worse than me in that regard ;-) However, given that most 
> (if not all, I've stopped looking after 50) drivers seem to use an empty 
> initializer at the end of their of_device_id array, I'm not sure whether we 
> really need to care. I assume LLVM handles the empty initializer fine.

I looked some examples too. Looks like empty { } are more common in
kernel than { 0 }. I guess either we add this warning to checkpatch or
we keep accepting it waiting for ANSI C will to adopt this at some
point :)

Br, David

      reply	other threads:[~2013-11-17  2:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-13 16:26 [PATCH] gpio: rcar: Support both edge trigger with DT Laurent Pinchart
2013-11-14  6:12 ` Magnus Damm
2013-11-28 15:31   ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-11-29 12:23     ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-15  4:43 ` David Cohen
2013-11-17  0:57   ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-11-17  2:38     ` David Cohen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52882C39.2050505@linux.intel.com \
    --to=david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).