From: Alex Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
To: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Rhyland Klein <rklein@nvidia.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: better lookup method for platform GPIOs
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 19:33:35 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <529C61FF.4020802@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131129115748.GB3942@xps8300>
On 11/29/2013 08:57 PM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 05:46:28PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> @@ -88,16 +89,20 @@ Note that GPIO_LOOKUP() is just a shortcut to GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX() where idx = 0.
>>
>> A lookup table can then be defined as follows:
>>
>> - struct gpiod_lookup gpios_table[] = {
>> - GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX("gpio.0", 15, "foo.0", "led", 0, GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH),
>> - GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX("gpio.0", 16, "foo.0", "led", 1, GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH),
>> - GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX("gpio.0", 17, "foo.0", "led", 2, GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH),
>> - GPIO_LOOKUP("gpio.0", 1, "foo.0", "power", GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW),
>> - };
>> +struct gpiod_lookup_table gpios_table = {
>> + .dev_id = "foo.0",
>> + .size = 4,
>> + .table = {
>> + GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX("gpio.0", 15, "led", 0, GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH),
>> + GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX("gpio.0", 16, "led", 1, GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH),
>> + GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX("gpio.0", 17, "led", 2, GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH),
>> + GPIO_LOOKUP("gpio.0", 1, "power", GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW),
>> + },
>> +};
>
> Instead of using the size variable, wouldn't it be more clear to
> expect the array to be null terminated?
This is a zero-length array, its entries are not pointers but flattened
lookup entries. Thus you cannot simply null-terminate it. It would be
possible to use { NULL } as a terminator, but this would expand into a
whole gpiod_lookup and is not very pleasant esthetically-speaking. So I
think the size member is maybe better suited here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-02 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-28 8:46 [PATCH] gpio: better lookup method for platform GPIOs Alexandre Courbot
2013-11-28 14:45 ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-28 15:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-11-28 16:59 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-11-28 15:54 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-11-29 6:17 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-12-02 10:50 ` Alex Courbot
2013-11-29 11:57 ` Heikki Krogerus
2013-11-29 11:59 ` Heikki Krogerus
2013-12-02 10:33 ` Alex Courbot [this message]
2013-12-02 11:11 ` Heikki Krogerus
2013-12-02 12:30 ` Alexandre Courbot
2013-12-03 3:20 ` [PATCH v3] " Alexandre Courbot
2013-12-03 11:04 ` Heikki Krogerus
2013-12-03 12:12 ` Linus Walleij
2013-12-09 13:07 ` Linus Walleij
2013-12-02 11:01 ` [PATCH v2] " Alexandre Courbot
2013-12-02 11:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-12-02 12:37 ` Alexandre Courbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=529C61FF.4020802@nvidia.com \
--to=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rklein@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).