From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Gortmaker Subject: Re: [PATCH 59/73] drivers/gpio: delete non-required instances of include Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 10:00:25 -0500 Message-ID: <52F25209.2010506@windriver.com> References: <1390339396-3479-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <1390339396-3479-60-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <20140124095827.1ee8ddcfed8d1c8e0a6d3dbd@canb.auug.org.au> <20140124022154.GA13428@windriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Stephen Rothwell , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" , Alexandre Courbot , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On 14-02-05 08:02 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:21 AM, Paul Gortmaker > wrote: > >> For what it is worth, I'm not removing any patches from my series file >> until they explicitly conflict and/or become redundant. If a maintainer >> says they are adding the patch, I add a comment in the series file, but >> I don't remove them until I see them come into next via another branch, >> and/or sfr reports a conflict/redundancy. > > So I can add these patches to my devel branches now I think? The patches that weren't taken by maintainers before 3.14-rc1 were encompassed in the cleanup pull request to Linus sent yesterday. http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg304864.html So, assuming he does pull it, you'll not have to do anything. Thanks, Paul. -- > > Yours, > Linus Walleij >