From: Rob Jones <rob.jones@codethink.co.uk>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: Himangi Saraogi <himangi774@gmail.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com>,
Paul Parsons <lost.distance@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] gpiolib: devres: Introduce the function devm_request_gpio_array
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 13:48:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53BD3A1D.8060401@codethink.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1407091351530.2375@hadrien>
On 09/07/14 12:52, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2014, Rob Jones wrote:
>
>> Please note that I submitted a patch on 02/07/14 to create this
>> function which was acked by Linus Walleij on 05/07/14.
>>
>> Great minds think alike, and all that.
>>
>> However, I think that the version I submitted better replicates the
>> original (non devm) functionality, see below.
<snip>
>>> +int devm_gpio_request_array(struct device *dev, const struct gpio *array,
>>> + size_t num)
>>> +{
>>> + int i, err;
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0; i < num; i++, array++) {
>>> + err = devm_gpio_request_one(dev, array->gpio, array->flags,
>>> + array->label);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + return err;
>>
>> The failure path in the version I submitted frees up any already
>> allocated gpios on the first failure.
>
> Himangi first proposed doing that, but I thought it was not really in the
> spirit of devm functions, which is to leave that implicit. No strong
> opinion on the matter, though.
>
Interestingly, we came at it from the other direction: I originally
didn't have the unwind in and our internal review guys suggested that
it was in the original function so putting it in would:
1. make this a better analogue of the original
2. help avoid deadlocks
3. allow the driver to retry, perhaps requesting reduced functionality.
> julia
>
<snip>
--
Rob Jones
Codethink Ltd
mailto:rob.jones@codethink.co.uk
tel:+44 161 236 5575
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-09 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-06 17:46 [PATCH 0/5] Introduce a managed function for gpio_request_array Himangi Saraogi
2014-07-06 17:47 ` [PATCH 1/5] gpiolib: devres: Introduce the function devm_request_gpio_array Himangi Saraogi
2014-07-09 11:18 ` Rob Jones
2014-07-09 11:52 ` Julia Lawall
2014-07-09 12:48 ` Rob Jones [this message]
2014-07-10 9:21 ` Linus Walleij
2014-07-10 11:01 ` Rob Jones
2014-07-11 0:35 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-07-11 10:03 ` Rob Jones
2014-07-11 10:07 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-08-14 15:17 ` Rob Jones
2014-07-06 17:48 ` [PATCH 2/5] ASoC: wm1250-ev1: Use devm_gpio_request_array Himangi Saraogi
2014-07-06 17:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] ASoC: pxa: " Himangi Saraogi
2014-07-06 17:51 ` [PATCH 4/5] ASoC: pxa: e800_wm9712: Introduce the use of devm_gpio_request_array Himangi Saraogi
2014-07-06 17:52 ` [PATCH 5/5] ASoC: pxa/hx4700: " Himangi Saraogi
2014-07-09 10:14 ` [PATCH 0/5] Introduce a managed function for gpio_request_array Linus Walleij
2014-07-09 12:10 ` Alexandre Courbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53BD3A1D.8060401@codethink.co.uk \
--to=rob.jones@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=eric.y.miao@gmail.com \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@gmail.com \
--cc=himangi774@gmail.com \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=lost.distance@yahoo.com \
--cc=patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=philipp.zabel@gmail.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).