From: "Kristina Martšenko" <kristina.martsenko@gmail.com>
To: Michael Heimpold <mhei@heimpold.de>
Cc: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Chris Ball <chris@printf.net>,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Regression Resend] mmc: mx28: sd card detection broken since 3.18-rc1
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 23:50:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5457F8BD.1040800@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8090335.0rPHov2cpK@kerker>
On 03/11/14 22:49, Michael Heimpold wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Michael,
> Am Montag, 3. November 2014, 01:01:07 schrieben Sie:
>> On 01/11/14 23:40, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> i was testing Linux Kernel 3.18-rc2 with my i.MX28 board (I2SE Duckbill) and ran
>>> into the problem that the sd card isn't detected from the Kernel at booting
>>> (driver: mxs-mmc.c). That results in a endless wait for the root partition
>>
>> I ran into this issue as well. Seems that a card-detect flag
>> (MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGH) can currently be set based on an
>> uninitialized variable, which can lead to the card being reported as
>> not present. This patch fixes it for me:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
>> index 03c53b72a2d6..f0e187682d3b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
>> @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ int mmc_of_parse(struct mmc_host *host)
>> struct device_node *np;
>> u32 bus_width;
>> int len, ret;
>> - bool cap_invert, gpio_invert;
>> + bool cap_invert, gpio_invert = false;
>>
>
> sorry, but I don't understand how your patch fixes the problem.
>
> First use of the gpio_invert bool is in line 370/371 within mmc_gpiod_request_cd
> (re-wrapped into a single line here for better reading):
>
> -snip-
> ret = mmc_gpiod_request_cd(host, "cd", 0, true, 0, &gpio_invert);
> -snap-
>
> A pointer to the bool is passed, and inside mmc_gpiod_request_cd (drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c,
> line 322), always a value is assigned:
>
> -snip-
> if (gpio_invert)
> *gpio_invert = !gpiod_is_active_low(desc);
> -snap-
>
> So returning to mmc_of_parse, the bool should always have an initialized value.
> Apart from some error handling, the bool is used immediately in the xor expression
> and results in setting MMC_CAP2_CD_ACTIVE_HIGH bit, or not.
>
> I also cannot see a code path, where gpio_invert is used without a call to mmc_gpiod_request_cd.
>
> Would be nice, if you could point me to what I'm missing.
mmc_gpiod_request_cd can return without ever reaching the line where
the value is assigned to gpio_invert:
desc = devm_gpiod_get_index(host->parent, con_id, idx, GPIOD_IN);
if (IS_ERR(desc))
return PTR_ERR(desc);
This can happen when the host controller doesn't use a GPIO for card
detection (but instead uses a dedicated pin). In this case
devm_gpiod_get_index will return -ENOENT.
>> if (!host->parent || !host->parent->of_node)
>> return 0;
>> @@ -401,6 +401,7 @@ int mmc_of_parse(struct mmc_host *host)
>> else
>> cap_invert = false;
>>
>> + gpio_invert = false;
>> ret = mmc_gpiod_request_ro(host, "wp", 0, false, 0, &gpio_invert);
>
> Same here. The functions always assigns a value when a pointer is given.
Same thing, the function can return before gpio_invert is ever assigned
to.
> (And this change is unrelated to the reporters problem, so should be fixed with a
> dedicated patch.)
Since both flags are set wrong for the exact same reason, and they're
both regressions in 3.18, I thought it would make sense to fix them
both in one patch. (Especially since I think it's cleaner to split the
gpio_invert variable into cd_gpio_invert and ro_gpio_invert, and I was
going to do that in the patch I'd send.) Let me know if you still think
I should send separate patches for them.
Thanks for the review,
Kristina
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-03 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-01 21:40 [Regression Resend] mmc: mx28: sd card detection broken since 3.18-rc1 Stefan Wahren
2014-11-02 23:01 ` Kristina Martšenko
2014-11-03 2:23 ` Fabio Estevam
2014-11-03 7:15 ` Stefan Wahren
2014-11-03 20:49 ` Michael Heimpold
2014-11-03 21:50 ` Kristina Martšenko [this message]
2014-11-03 23:26 ` Michael Heimpold
2014-11-04 10:30 ` Linus Walleij
2014-11-05 0:22 ` [PATCH] mmc: core: fix card detection regression Kristina Martšenko
2014-11-05 0:48 ` Fabio Estevam
2014-11-05 9:30 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5457F8BD.1040800@gmail.com \
--to=kristina.martsenko@gmail.com \
--cc=chris@printf.net \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhei@heimpold.de \
--cc=stefan.wahren@i2se.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).