From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Grygorii.Strashko@linaro.org" Subject: Re: [RFT OMAP1 PATCH 7/8] gpio: omap: get rid of omap_irq_to_gpio() Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 22:39:27 +0200 Message-ID: <550C857F.5060705@linaro.org> References: <1426785944-17255-1-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@linaro.org> <1426785944-17255-8-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Javier Martinez Canillas , Grygorii Strashko , Aaro Koskinen Cc: Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot , Santosh Shilimkar , Kevin Hilman , Tony Lindgren , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , Linux GPIO List , Linux Kernel List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On 03/20/2015 08:56 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Grygorii, > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:25 PM, wrote: >> From: Grygorii Strashko >> >> Now OMAP GPIO driver prepared for omap_irq_to_gpio() removing. >> Do it ;) >> >> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko > > I don't have access to OMAP1 boards to test but Tony did it o an > osk5912 and Aaro can confirm that it doesn't cause regressions on > other OMAP1 boards. Thanks. But could you clarify one point to me please? "Aaro can confirm that it doesn't cause regressions on other OMAP1 boards" - Does It mean I can add his Tested-by? Or I still have to wait for his direct reply? Just to avoid any confusions ;) > Acked-by: Javier Martinez Canillas > -- regards, -grygorii