From: santosh shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST] gpio: omap: use raw locks for locking
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:42:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5584547B.9040203@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150619170654.GA4937@linutronix.de>
On 6/19/2015 10:06 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> This patch converts gpio_bank.lock from a spin_lock into a
> raw_spin_lock. The call path is to access this lock is always under a
> raw_spin_lock, for instance
> - __setup_irq() holds &desc->lock with irq off
> + __irq_set_trigger()
> + omap_gpio_irq_type()
>
> - handle_level_irq() (runs with irqs off therefore raw locks)
> + mask_ack_irq()
> + omap_gpio_mask_irq()
>
> This fixes the obvious backtrace on -RT. However the locking vs context
> is not and this is not limited to -RT:
> - omap_gpio_irq_type() is called with IRQ off and has an conditional
> call to pm_runtime_get_sync() which may sleep. Either it may happen or
> it may not happen but pm_runtime_get_sync() should not be called with
> irqs off.
>
> - omap_gpio_debounce() is holding the lock with IRQs off.
> + omap2_set_gpio_debounce()
> + clk_prepare_enable()
> + clk_prepare() this one might sleep.
> The number of users of gpiod_set_debounce() / gpio_set_debounce()
> looks low but still this is not good.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
Should be safe to do it.
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-19 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-19 17:06 [PATCH REPOST] gpio: omap: use raw locks for locking Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-06-19 17:42 ` santosh shilimkar [this message]
2015-06-19 21:54 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-06-22 7:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-06-30 10:55 ` Grygorii Strashko
2015-06-30 16:36 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-07-01 7:32 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-07-01 11:29 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-07-07 8:58 ` Grygorii Strashko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5584547B.9040203@oracle.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=javier@dowhile0.org \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).