linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <guenter@roeck-us.net>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Problems with commit a770d946371e ("gpio: pxa: add pin control gpio direction and request")
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 18:01:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F730DF.9080307@roeck-us.net> (raw)

Hi,

when trying pxa_defconfig with various pxa270 and pxa255 qemu targets, I noticed that the gpio
pin direction is no longer set. Bisect points to commit a770d946371e ("gpio: pxa: add pin control
gpio direction and request"). As it turns out, pxa_defconfig does not configure PINCTRL. As a result,
pinctrl stub functions are used. Those all return 0 if PINCTRL is not configured. This causes the
pxa gpio driver to wrongly assume that pinctrl configured the gpio pin direction, and does nothing.

Looking into gpio-mvebu.c, its use of the pinctrl functions is completely different. It aborts
on error, not on success, from the pinctrl functions. Given that, I have no idea how to resolve
the problem. Having the stub functions return an error might cause the mvebu driver (and maybe
others) to fail if there is no pinctrl driver, so that does not seem to be an option.

If the idea is to mandate pinctrl for PXA architectures, it should probably be enabled for those
architectures. Unless I am missing something, PXA architectures to not select PINCTRL, which
suggests that the problem may affect a wide range of systems. Please have a look.

Thanks,
Guenter


             reply	other threads:[~2016-03-27  1:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-27  1:01 Guenter Roeck [this message]
2016-03-27 20:29 ` Problems with commit a770d946371e ("gpio: pxa: add pin control gpio direction and request") Robert Jarzmik
2016-03-27 23:02   ` Guenter Roeck
2016-04-07 14:51   ` Guenter Roeck
2016-04-07 18:20     ` Robert Jarzmik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56F730DF.9080307@roeck-us.net \
    --to=guenter@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).