public inbox for linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>
To: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@nxp.com>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gpio: mxc: remove static allocation of GPIO base
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:29:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5941337.lOV4Wx5bFT@steina-w> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=Mfv-fQPa6Sz9jQ-2BgcZkAsTN=T6UKKnLUUs=exRHiZsA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

Am Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2023, 09:29:36 CET schrieb Bartosz Golaszewski:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 11:47 PM Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@nxp.com> wrote:
> > The latest gpio driver framework will give the following warning
> > when it detects the static allocation of the GPIO bases.
> > 
> > "[    1.329312] gpio gpiochip0: Static allocation of GPIO base is
> > deprecated, use dynamic allocation."
> > 
> > This patch removes the static allocation of GPIO base to get rid
> > of the warning message.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@nxp.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c | 2 --
> >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
> > index d5626c572d24..07948175441c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
> > @@ -450,8 +450,6 @@ static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> > 
> >         port->gc.request = gpiochip_generic_request;
> >         port->gc.free = gpiochip_generic_free;
> >         port->gc.to_irq = mxc_gpio_to_irq;
> > 
> > -       port->gc.base = (pdev->id < 0) ? of_alias_get_id(np, "gpio") * 32
> > :
> > -                                            pdev->id * 32;
> > 
> >         err = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &port->gc, port);
> >         if (err)
> > 
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> 
> This is one of the drivers for which we can't do it yet:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20230120104647.nwki4silrtd7bt3w@pengutron
> ix.de/

I just send a patch for adding generic GPIO alias support at [1].

Having that support added this patch should apply without adding a regression.

Best regards,
Alexander

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20230215092421.143199-1-alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com/T/#u
-- 
TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany
Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018
Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider
http://www.tq-group.com/



  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-15  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-14 22:46 [PATCH 1/1] gpio: mxc: remove static allocation of GPIO base Shenwei Wang
2023-02-15  8:29 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-02-15  9:29   ` Alexander Stein [this message]
2023-02-15 15:15   ` [EXT] " Shenwei Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5941337.lOV4Wx5bFT@steina-w \
    --to=alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shenwei.wang@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox