linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [bug report] pinctrl: core: Handling pinmux and pinconf separately
@ 2021-03-12  6:51 Dan Carpenter
  2021-03-12  6:56 ` Dan Carpenter
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2021-03-12  6:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: michal.simek; +Cc: linux-gpio

Hello Michal Simek,

The patch 0952b7ec1614: "pinctrl: core: Handling pinmux and pinconf
separately" from Mar 10, 2021, leads to the following static checker
warning:

	drivers/pinctrl/core.c:1275 pinctrl_commit_state()
	error: uninitialized symbol 'ret'.

drivers/pinctrl/core.c
  1239  static int pinctrl_commit_state(struct pinctrl *p, struct pinctrl_state *state)
  1240  {
  1241          struct pinctrl_setting *setting, *setting2;
  1242          struct pinctrl_state *old_state = p->state;
  1243          int ret;
  1244  
  1245          if (p->state) {
  1246                  /*
  1247                   * For each pinmux setting in the old state, forget SW's record
  1248                   * of mux owner for that pingroup. Any pingroups which are
  1249                   * still owned by the new state will be re-acquired by the call
  1250                   * to pinmux_enable_setting() in the loop below.
  1251                   */
  1252                  list_for_each_entry(setting, &p->state->settings, node) {
  1253                          if (setting->type != PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP)
  1254                                  continue;
  1255                          pinmux_disable_setting(setting);
  1256                  }
  1257          }
  1258  
  1259          p->state = NULL;
  1260  
  1261          /* Apply all the settings for the new state - pinmux first */
  1262          list_for_each_entry(setting, &state->settings, node) {
  1263                  switch (setting->type) {
  1264                  case PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP:
  1265                          ret = pinmux_enable_setting(setting);
  1266                          break;
  1267                  case PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN:
  1268                  case PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP:
  1269                          break;

"ret" not set on these cases.

  1270                  default:
  1271                          ret = -EINVAL;
  1272                          break;
  1273                  }
  1274  
  1275                  if (ret < 0)
  1276                          goto unapply_new_state;
  1277  
  1278                  /* Do not link hogs (circular dependency) */
  1279                  if (p != setting->pctldev->p)

regards,
dan carpenter

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [bug report] pinctrl: core: Handling pinmux and pinconf separately
  2021-03-12  6:51 [bug report] pinctrl: core: Handling pinmux and pinconf separately Dan Carpenter
@ 2021-03-12  6:56 ` Dan Carpenter
  2021-03-12  7:33   ` Michal Simek
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2021-03-12  6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: michal.simek; +Cc: linux-gpio

It also complains about the next loop but that's a false positive
because dealing with lists of data is tricky.

drivers/pinctrl/core.c:1297 pinctrl_commit_state() error: uninitialized symbol 'ret'.

I saw these two warnings initially from zero day bot but didn't forward
it on because I only noticed the issue with second loop and not the
first one.  #LifeLessonOrSomething

regards,
dan carpenter

On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 09:51:09AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hello Michal Simek,
> 
> The patch 0952b7ec1614: "pinctrl: core: Handling pinmux and pinconf
> separately" from Mar 10, 2021, leads to the following static checker
> warning:
> 
> 	drivers/pinctrl/core.c:1275 pinctrl_commit_state()
> 	error: uninitialized symbol 'ret'.
> 
> drivers/pinctrl/core.c
>   1239  static int pinctrl_commit_state(struct pinctrl *p, struct pinctrl_state *state)
>   1240  {
>   1241          struct pinctrl_setting *setting, *setting2;
>   1242          struct pinctrl_state *old_state = p->state;
>   1243          int ret;
>   1244  
>   1245          if (p->state) {
>   1246                  /*
>   1247                   * For each pinmux setting in the old state, forget SW's record
>   1248                   * of mux owner for that pingroup. Any pingroups which are
>   1249                   * still owned by the new state will be re-acquired by the call
>   1250                   * to pinmux_enable_setting() in the loop below.
>   1251                   */
>   1252                  list_for_each_entry(setting, &p->state->settings, node) {
>   1253                          if (setting->type != PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP)
>   1254                                  continue;
>   1255                          pinmux_disable_setting(setting);
>   1256                  }
>   1257          }
>   1258  
>   1259          p->state = NULL;
>   1260  
>   1261          /* Apply all the settings for the new state - pinmux first */
>   1262          list_for_each_entry(setting, &state->settings, node) {
>   1263                  switch (setting->type) {
>   1264                  case PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP:
>   1265                          ret = pinmux_enable_setting(setting);
>   1266                          break;
>   1267                  case PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN:
>   1268                  case PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP:
>   1269                          break;
> 
> "ret" not set on these cases.
> 
>   1270                  default:
>   1271                          ret = -EINVAL;
>   1272                          break;
>   1273                  }
>   1274  
>   1275                  if (ret < 0)
>   1276                          goto unapply_new_state;
>   1277  
>   1278                  /* Do not link hogs (circular dependency) */
>   1279                  if (p != setting->pctldev->p)
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [bug report] pinctrl: core: Handling pinmux and pinconf separately
  2021-03-12  6:56 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2021-03-12  7:33   ` Michal Simek
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michal Simek @ 2021-03-12  7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter, michal.simek, Colin King; +Cc: linux-gpio

Hi,

On 3/12/21 7:56 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> It also complains about the next loop but that's a false positive
> because dealing with lists of data is tricky.
> 
> drivers/pinctrl/core.c:1297 pinctrl_commit_state() error: uninitialized symbol 'ret'.
> 
> I saw these two warnings initially from zero day bot but didn't forward
> it on because I only noticed the issue with second loop and not the
> first one.  #LifeLessonOrSomething

It was reported by Colin yesterday.
lore.kernel.org/r/34c61597-a90b-5d90-f9fb-4ede3ece3b4c@canonical.com

Definitely thanks for report.

Thanks,
Michal


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-12  7:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-12  6:51 [bug report] pinctrl: core: Handling pinmux and pinconf separately Dan Carpenter
2021-03-12  6:56 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-03-12  7:33   ` Michal Simek

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).