* [PATCH 0/7] Rename RK1108 to RV1108
@ 2017-02-13 10:59 Andy Yan
2017-02-13 11:07 ` [PATCH 5/7] pinctrl: rockchip: rename " Andy Yan
2017-02-13 12:51 ` [PATCH 0/7] Rename " Heiko Stuebner
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andy Yan @ 2017-02-13 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ,
linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A,
robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A
Cc: shawn.lin-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw,
linux-clk-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, sboyd-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ,
linux-gpio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, Andy Yan
Rockchip finally named this soc as RV1108, so change
RK1108/rk1108 to RV1108/rv1108 for compatible.
Andy Yan (7):
dt-bindings: rockchip-dw-mshc: rename RK1108 to RV1108
dt-bindings: rk1108-cru: rename RK1108 to RV1108
clk: rockchip: rename RK1108 to RV1108
dt-bindings: rockchip,pinctrl: rename RK1108 to RV1108
pinctrl: rockchip: rename RK1108 to RV1108
ARM: dts: rename RK1108 to RV1108
ARM: rockchip: reanme RK1108 to RV1108
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt | 4 +-
...chip,rk1108-cru.txt => rockchip,rv1108-cru.txt} | 12 +-
.../devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.txt | 2 +-
.../bindings/pinctrl/rockchip,pinctrl.txt | 16 +-
arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 2 +-
.../boot/dts/{rk1108-evb.dts => rv1108-evb.dts} | 7 +-
arch/arm/boot/dts/{rk1108.dtsi => rv1108.dtsi} | 24 +-
drivers/clk/rockchip/Makefile | 2 +-
.../clk/rockchip/{clk-rk1108.c => clk-rv1108.c} | 414 ++++++++++-----------
drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h | 28 +-
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c | 76 ++--
.../clock/{rk1108-cru.h => rv1108-cru.h} | 6 +-
12 files changed, 300 insertions(+), 293 deletions(-)
rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/{rockchip,rk1108-cru.txt => rockchip,rv1108-cru.txt} (83%)
rename arch/arm/boot/dts/{rk1108-evb.dts => rv1108-evb.dts} (89%)
rename arch/arm/boot/dts/{rk1108.dtsi => rv1108.dtsi} (94%)
rename drivers/clk/rockchip/{clk-rk1108.c => clk-rv1108.c} (57%)
rename include/dt-bindings/clock/{rk1108-cru.h => rv1108-cru.h} (97%)
--
2.7.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [PATCH 5/7] pinctrl: rockchip: rename RK1108 to RV1108 2017-02-13 10:59 [PATCH 0/7] Rename RK1108 to RV1108 Andy Yan @ 2017-02-13 11:07 ` Andy Yan 2017-02-22 18:34 ` Heiko Stuebner 2017-02-13 12:51 ` [PATCH 0/7] Rename " Heiko Stuebner 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Andy Yan @ 2017-02-13 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: heiko, linus.walleij Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, linux-rockchip, linux-arm-kernel, Andy Yan Rockchip finally named the SOC as RV1108, so change it. Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com> --- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c index 08765f5..d7f1f9a 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ #define GPIO_LS_SYNC 0x60 enum rockchip_pinctrl_type { - RK1108, + RV1108, RK2928, RK3066B, RK3188, @@ -625,13 +625,13 @@ static int rockchip_set_mux(struct rockchip_pin_bank *bank, int pin, int mux) return ret; } -#define RK1108_PULL_PMU_OFFSET 0x10 -#define RK1108_PULL_OFFSET 0x110 -#define RK1108_PULL_PINS_PER_REG 8 -#define RK1108_PULL_BITS_PER_PIN 2 -#define RK1108_PULL_BANK_STRIDE 16 +#define RV1108_PULL_PMU_OFFSET 0x10 +#define RV1108_PULL_OFFSET 0x110 +#define RV1108_PULL_PINS_PER_REG 8 +#define RV1108_PULL_BITS_PER_PIN 2 +#define RV1108_PULL_BANK_STRIDE 16 -static void rk1108_calc_pull_reg_and_bit(struct rockchip_pin_bank *bank, +static void rv1108_calc_pull_reg_and_bit(struct rockchip_pin_bank *bank, int pin_num, struct regmap **regmap, int *reg, u8 *bit) { @@ -640,27 +640,27 @@ static void rk1108_calc_pull_reg_and_bit(struct rockchip_pin_bank *bank, /* The first 24 pins of the first bank are located in PMU */ if (bank->bank_num == 0) { *regmap = info->regmap_pmu; - *reg = RK1108_PULL_PMU_OFFSET; + *reg = RV1108_PULL_PMU_OFFSET; } else { - *reg = RK1108_PULL_OFFSET; + *reg = RV1108_PULL_OFFSET; *regmap = info->regmap_base; /* correct the offset, as we're starting with the 2nd bank */ *reg -= 0x10; - *reg += bank->bank_num * RK1108_PULL_BANK_STRIDE; + *reg += bank->bank_num * RV1108_PULL_BANK_STRIDE; } - *reg += ((pin_num / RK1108_PULL_PINS_PER_REG) * 4); - *bit = (pin_num % RK1108_PULL_PINS_PER_REG); - *bit *= RK1108_PULL_BITS_PER_PIN; + *reg += ((pin_num / RV1108_PULL_PINS_PER_REG) * 4); + *bit = (pin_num % RV1108_PULL_PINS_PER_REG); + *bit *= RV1108_PULL_BITS_PER_PIN; } -#define RK1108_DRV_PMU_OFFSET 0x20 -#define RK1108_DRV_GRF_OFFSET 0x210 -#define RK1108_DRV_BITS_PER_PIN 2 -#define RK1108_DRV_PINS_PER_REG 8 -#define RK1108_DRV_BANK_STRIDE 16 +#define RV1108_DRV_PMU_OFFSET 0x20 +#define RV1108_DRV_GRF_OFFSET 0x210 +#define RV1108_DRV_BITS_PER_PIN 2 +#define RV1108_DRV_PINS_PER_REG 8 +#define RV1108_DRV_BANK_STRIDE 16 -static void rk1108_calc_drv_reg_and_bit(struct rockchip_pin_bank *bank, +static void rv1108_calc_drv_reg_and_bit(struct rockchip_pin_bank *bank, int pin_num, struct regmap **regmap, int *reg, u8 *bit) { @@ -669,19 +669,19 @@ static void rk1108_calc_drv_reg_and_bit(struct rockchip_pin_bank *bank, /* The first 24 pins of the first bank are located in PMU */ if (bank->bank_num == 0) { *regmap = info->regmap_pmu; - *reg = RK1108_DRV_PMU_OFFSET; + *reg = RV1108_DRV_PMU_OFFSET; } else { *regmap = info->regmap_base; - *reg = RK1108_DRV_GRF_OFFSET; + *reg = RV1108_DRV_GRF_OFFSET; /* correct the offset, as we're starting with the 2nd bank */ *reg -= 0x10; - *reg += bank->bank_num * RK1108_DRV_BANK_STRIDE; + *reg += bank->bank_num * RV1108_DRV_BANK_STRIDE; } - *reg += ((pin_num / RK1108_DRV_PINS_PER_REG) * 4); - *bit = pin_num % RK1108_DRV_PINS_PER_REG; - *bit *= RK1108_DRV_BITS_PER_PIN; + *reg += ((pin_num / RV1108_DRV_PINS_PER_REG) * 4); + *bit = pin_num % RV1108_DRV_PINS_PER_REG; + *bit *= RV1108_DRV_BITS_PER_PIN; } #define RK2928_PULL_OFFSET 0x118 @@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@ static int rockchip_get_pull(struct rockchip_pin_bank *bank, int pin_num) return !(data & BIT(bit)) ? PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_PIN_DEFAULT : PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE; - case RK1108: + case RV1108: case RK3188: case RK3288: case RK3368: @@ -1230,7 +1230,7 @@ static int rockchip_set_pull(struct rockchip_pin_bank *bank, spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->slock, flags); break; - case RK1108: + case RV1108: case RK3188: case RK3288: case RK3368: @@ -1420,7 +1420,7 @@ static bool rockchip_pinconf_pull_valid(struct rockchip_pin_ctrl *ctrl, pull == PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE); case RK3066B: return pull ? false : true; - case RK1108: + case RV1108: case RK3188: case RK3288: case RK3368: @@ -2518,7 +2518,7 @@ static int rockchip_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return 0; } -static struct rockchip_pin_bank rk1108_pin_banks[] = { +static struct rockchip_pin_bank rv1108_pin_banks[] = { PIN_BANK_IOMUX_FLAGS(0, 32, "gpio0", IOMUX_SOURCE_PMU, IOMUX_SOURCE_PMU, IOMUX_SOURCE_PMU, @@ -2528,15 +2528,15 @@ static struct rockchip_pin_bank rk1108_pin_banks[] = { PIN_BANK_IOMUX_FLAGS(3, 32, "gpio3", 0, 0, 0, 0), }; -static struct rockchip_pin_ctrl rk1108_pin_ctrl = { - .pin_banks = rk1108_pin_banks, - .nr_banks = ARRAY_SIZE(rk1108_pin_banks), - .label = "RK1108-GPIO", - .type = RK1108, +static struct rockchip_pin_ctrl rv1108_pin_ctrl = { + .pin_banks = rv1108_pin_banks, + .nr_banks = ARRAY_SIZE(rv1108_pin_banks), + .label = "RV1108-GPIO", + .type = RV1108, .grf_mux_offset = 0x10, .pmu_mux_offset = 0x0, - .pull_calc_reg = rk1108_calc_pull_reg_and_bit, - .drv_calc_reg = rk1108_calc_drv_reg_and_bit, + .pull_calc_reg = rv1108_calc_pull_reg_and_bit, + .drv_calc_reg = rv1108_calc_drv_reg_and_bit, }; static struct rockchip_pin_bank rk2928_pin_banks[] = { @@ -2768,8 +2768,8 @@ static struct rockchip_pin_ctrl rk3399_pin_ctrl = { }; static const struct of_device_id rockchip_pinctrl_dt_match[] = { - { .compatible = "rockchip,rk1108-pinctrl", - .data = (void *)&rk1108_pin_ctrl }, + { .compatible = "rockchip,rv1108-pinctrl", + .data = (void *)&rv1108_pin_ctrl }, { .compatible = "rockchip,rk2928-pinctrl", .data = (void *)&rk2928_pin_ctrl }, { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3036-pinctrl", -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5/7] pinctrl: rockchip: rename RK1108 to RV1108 2017-02-13 11:07 ` [PATCH 5/7] pinctrl: rockchip: rename " Andy Yan @ 2017-02-22 18:34 ` Heiko Stuebner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Heiko Stuebner @ 2017-02-22 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andy Yan Cc: linus.walleij, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, linux-rockchip, linux-arm-kernel Am Montag, 13. Februar 2017, 19:07:53 CET schrieb Andy Yan: > Rockchip finally named the SOC as RV1108, so change it. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/7] Rename RK1108 to RV1108 2017-02-13 10:59 [PATCH 0/7] Rename RK1108 to RV1108 Andy Yan 2017-02-13 11:07 ` [PATCH 5/7] pinctrl: rockchip: rename " Andy Yan @ 2017-02-13 12:51 ` Heiko Stuebner 2017-02-14 0:44 ` Andy Yan 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Heiko Stuebner @ 2017-02-13 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andy Yan, robh+dt Cc: linus.walleij, shawn.lin, linux-clk, linux-rockchip, devicetree, sboyd, linux-gpio, linux-arm-kernel Hi Andy, Am Montag, 13. Februar 2017, 18:59:26 CET schrieb Andy Yan: > Rockchip finally named this soc as RV1108, so change > RK1108/rk1108 to RV1108/rv1108 for compatible. renaming existing bindings (that have been in multiple kernel versions already) always is a hot topic. So I'll be hoping for Rob to give a go-ahead for it :-) . Just to confirm, the rk1108/rv1108 is completely new to the market, so we're not breaking any existing devices, right? Heiko > Andy Yan (7): > dt-bindings: rockchip-dw-mshc: rename RK1108 to RV1108 > dt-bindings: rk1108-cru: rename RK1108 to RV1108 > clk: rockchip: rename RK1108 to RV1108 > dt-bindings: rockchip,pinctrl: rename RK1108 to RV1108 > pinctrl: rockchip: rename RK1108 to RV1108 > ARM: dts: rename RK1108 to RV1108 > ARM: rockchip: reanme RK1108 to RV1108 > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt | 4 +- > ...chip,rk1108-cru.txt => rockchip,rv1108-cru.txt} | 12 +- > .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.txt | 2 +- > .../bindings/pinctrl/rockchip,pinctrl.txt | 16 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 2 +- > .../boot/dts/{rk1108-evb.dts => rv1108-evb.dts} | 7 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/{rk1108.dtsi => rv1108.dtsi} | 24 +- > drivers/clk/rockchip/Makefile | 2 +- > .../clk/rockchip/{clk-rk1108.c => clk-rv1108.c} | 414 > ++++++++++----------- drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h | > 28 +- > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c | 76 ++-- > .../clock/{rk1108-cru.h => rv1108-cru.h} | 6 +- > 12 files changed, 300 insertions(+), 293 deletions(-) > rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/{rockchip,rk1108-cru.txt => > rockchip,rv1108-cru.txt} (83%) rename arch/arm/boot/dts/{rk1108-evb.dts => > rv1108-evb.dts} (89%) rename arch/arm/boot/dts/{rk1108.dtsi => rv1108.dtsi} > (94%) > rename drivers/clk/rockchip/{clk-rk1108.c => clk-rv1108.c} (57%) > rename include/dt-bindings/clock/{rk1108-cru.h => rv1108-cru.h} (97%) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/7] Rename RK1108 to RV1108 2017-02-13 12:51 ` [PATCH 0/7] Rename " Heiko Stuebner @ 2017-02-14 0:44 ` Andy Yan 2017-02-23 10:15 ` Linus Walleij 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Andy Yan @ 2017-02-14 0:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Heiko Stuebner, robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A Cc: devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-gpio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A, sboyd-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ, linux-clk-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, shawn.lin-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r Hi Heiko & Rob: On 2017年02月13日 20:51, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > Hi Andy, > > Am Montag, 13. Februar 2017, 18:59:26 CET schrieb Andy Yan: >> Rockchip finally named this soc as RV1108, so change >> RK1108/rk1108 to RV1108/rv1108 for compatible. > renaming existing bindings (that have been in multiple kernel versions > already) always is a hot topic. So I'll be hoping for Rob to give a go-ahead > for it :-) . > > Just to confirm, the rk1108/rv1108 is completely new to the market, so we're > not breaking any existing devices, right? Yes, the 1108 Soc is completely new to market, this change will not breaking any existing devices. Hope more suggestions from you. > > Heiko > > > >> Andy Yan (7): >> dt-bindings: rockchip-dw-mshc: rename RK1108 to RV1108 >> dt-bindings: rk1108-cru: rename RK1108 to RV1108 >> clk: rockchip: rename RK1108 to RV1108 >> dt-bindings: rockchip,pinctrl: rename RK1108 to RV1108 >> pinctrl: rockchip: rename RK1108 to RV1108 >> ARM: dts: rename RK1108 to RV1108 >> ARM: rockchip: reanme RK1108 to RV1108 >> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt | 4 +- >> ...chip,rk1108-cru.txt => rockchip,rv1108-cru.txt} | 12 +- >> .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.txt | 2 +- >> .../bindings/pinctrl/rockchip,pinctrl.txt | 16 +- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 2 +- >> .../boot/dts/{rk1108-evb.dts => rv1108-evb.dts} | 7 +- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/{rk1108.dtsi => rv1108.dtsi} | 24 +- >> drivers/clk/rockchip/Makefile | 2 +- >> .../clk/rockchip/{clk-rk1108.c => clk-rv1108.c} | 414 >> ++++++++++----------- drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.h | >> 28 +- >> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-rockchip.c | 76 ++-- >> .../clock/{rk1108-cru.h => rv1108-cru.h} | 6 +- >> 12 files changed, 300 insertions(+), 293 deletions(-) >> rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/{rockchip,rk1108-cru.txt => >> rockchip,rv1108-cru.txt} (83%) rename arch/arm/boot/dts/{rk1108-evb.dts => >> rv1108-evb.dts} (89%) rename arch/arm/boot/dts/{rk1108.dtsi => rv1108.dtsi} >> (94%) >> rename drivers/clk/rockchip/{clk-rk1108.c => clk-rv1108.c} (57%) >> rename include/dt-bindings/clock/{rk1108-cru.h => rv1108-cru.h} (97%) > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-rockchip mailing list > Linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/7] Rename RK1108 to RV1108 2017-02-14 0:44 ` Andy Yan @ 2017-02-23 10:15 ` Linus Walleij [not found] ` <CACRpkdbNbGvwUq3uLgekimOwzBZCXf37JW9LCCqLm1so=CMNrw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Linus Walleij @ 2017-02-23 10:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andy Yan Cc: Heiko Stuebner, Rob Herring, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..., Shawn Lin, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com> wrote: > Hi Heiko & Rob: > On 2017年02月13日 20:51, Heiko Stuebner wrote: >> >> Hi Andy, >> >> Am Montag, 13. Februar 2017, 18:59:26 CET schrieb Andy Yan: >>> >>> Rockchip finally named this soc as RV1108, so change >>> RK1108/rk1108 to RV1108/rv1108 for compatible. >> >> renaming existing bindings (that have been in multiple kernel versions >> already) always is a hot topic. So I'll be hoping for Rob to give a >> go-ahead >> for it :-) . >> >> Just to confirm, the rk1108/rv1108 is completely new to the market, so >> we're >> not breaking any existing devices, right? > > > Yes, the 1108 Soc is completely new to market, this change will not > breaking any existing devices. Nobody gets hurt. Just rename everything to avoid confusion. Just my €0.01. Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Tell me if I can merge a subset of the patches to the pinctrl tree. Yours, Linus Walleij ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CACRpkdbNbGvwUq3uLgekimOwzBZCXf37JW9LCCqLm1so=CMNrw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH 0/7] Rename RK1108 to RV1108 [not found] ` <CACRpkdbNbGvwUq3uLgekimOwzBZCXf37JW9LCCqLm1so=CMNrw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2017-02-23 15:00 ` Heiko Stuebner 2017-03-14 13:36 ` Linus Walleij 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Heiko Stuebner @ 2017-02-23 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linus Walleij Cc: devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..., Shawn Lin, Stephen Boyd, linux-gpio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Rob Herring, Andy Yan, linux-clk, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org Hi Linus, Am Donnerstag, 23. Februar 2017, 11:15:56 CET schrieb Linus Walleij: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Andy Yan <andy.yan@rock-chips.com> wrote: > > Hi Heiko & Rob: > > > > On 2017年02月13日 20:51, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > >> Hi Andy, > >> > >> Am Montag, 13. Februar 2017, 18:59:26 CET schrieb Andy Yan: > >>> Rockchip finally named this soc as RV1108, so change > >>> RK1108/rk1108 to RV1108/rv1108 for compatible. > >> > >> renaming existing bindings (that have been in multiple kernel versions > >> already) always is a hot topic. So I'll be hoping for Rob to give a > >> go-ahead > >> for it :-) . > >> > >> Just to confirm, the rk1108/rv1108 is completely new to the market, so > >> we're > >> not breaking any existing devices, right? > >> > > Yes, the 1108 Soc is completely new to market, this change will not > > > > breaking any existing devices. > > Nobody gets hurt. Just rename everything to avoid confusion. > Just my €0.01. > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > > Tell me if I can merge a subset of the patches to the pinctrl tree. I did provide Reviewed-bys for them, so you should be able to merge the pinctrl patches (4+5) at your convenience :-) Thanks Heiko _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/7] Rename RK1108 to RV1108 2017-02-23 15:00 ` Heiko Stuebner @ 2017-03-14 13:36 ` Linus Walleij 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Linus Walleij @ 2017-03-14 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Heiko Stuebner Cc: Andy Yan, Rob Herring, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd, linux-clk, open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..., Shawn Lin, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 23. Februar 2017, 11:15:56 CET schrieb Linus Walleij: >> Nobody gets hurt. Just rename everything to avoid confusion. >> Just my €0.01. >> >> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> >> >> Tell me if I can merge a subset of the patches to the pinctrl tree. > > I did provide Reviewed-bys for them, so you should be able to merge the > pinctrl patches (4+5) at your convenience :-) They are conflicting right now, but I will merge it when I get a v4.11-rc1 based series. Yours, Linus Walleij ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-03-14 13:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-13 10:59 [PATCH 0/7] Rename RK1108 to RV1108 Andy Yan
2017-02-13 11:07 ` [PATCH 5/7] pinctrl: rockchip: rename " Andy Yan
2017-02-22 18:34 ` Heiko Stuebner
2017-02-13 12:51 ` [PATCH 0/7] Rename " Heiko Stuebner
2017-02-14 0:44 ` Andy Yan
2017-02-23 10:15 ` Linus Walleij
[not found] ` <CACRpkdbNbGvwUq3uLgekimOwzBZCXf37JW9LCCqLm1so=CMNrw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-23 15:00 ` Heiko Stuebner
2017-03-14 13:36 ` Linus Walleij
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).