From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrice Chotard Subject: Re: [patch] gpio: stmpe: || vs && typo Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 09:10:03 +0200 Message-ID: <72f9aaa3-4efb-2173-ba6c-96d961898ab0@st.com> References: <20161012062520.GY12841@mwanda> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20161012062520.GY12841@mwanda> Sender: kernel-janitors-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dan Carpenter , Linus Walleij Cc: Alexandre Courbot , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Hi Dan On 10/12/2016 08:25 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote: > && was obviously intended here. > > Fixes: 6936e1f88d23 ('gpio: stmpe: Write int status register only when needed') > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c > index e7d422a..5b00427 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c > @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ static irqreturn_t stmpe_gpio_irq(int irq, void *dev) > * 801/1801/1600, bits are cleared when read. > * Edge detect register is not present on 801/1600/1801 > */ > - if (stmpe->partnum != STMPE801 || stmpe->partnum != STMPE1600 || > + if (stmpe->partnum != STMPE801 && stmpe->partnum != STMPE1600 && > stmpe->partnum != STMPE1801) { > stmpe_reg_write(stmpe, statmsbreg + i, status[i]); > stmpe_reg_write(stmpe, > Well spotted ;-) Acked-by: Patrice Chotard Thanks