From: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@microchip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@kernel.org>,
Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@bootlin.com>,
Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>,
Kavyasree Kotagiri <kavyasree.kotagiri@microchip.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: convert ocelot-pinctrl to YAML format
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 14:04:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <735863d6476605e4ff72032d8971ac0d@walle.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <de9b0114-23b5-04b4-86b3-0d393441a267@kernel.org>
Am 2022-04-18 13:13, schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On 18/04/2022 10:19, Michael Walle wrote:
>> [resend, use Krysztof's new email address]
>>
>> Am 2022-04-18 01:41, schrieb Linus Walleij:
>>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 9:47 PM Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Convert the ocelot-pinctrl device tree binding to the new YAML
>>>> format.
>>>>
>>>> Additionally to the original binding documentation, add interrupt
>>>> properties which are optional and already used on several SoCs like
>>>> SparX-5, Luton, Ocelot and LAN966x but were not documented before.
>>>>
>>>> Also, on the sparx5 and the lan966x SoCs there are two items for the
>>>> reg property.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
>>>
>>> So is this single patch something I should apply to the pin control
>>> tree?
>>
>> The first five patches will fix the validation errrors once the
>> binding is converted to the YAML format. So, do they need to go
>> through the same tree?
>>
>> Also as mentioned, there is this pending series [1] which is the
>> reason I've converted the binding to YAML in the first place. So
>> at least the first patch of this series will have to go through
>> the same tree as the YAML conversion patch.
>>
>> How can we move forward here? Krzysztof, maybe all of the dt
>> bindings patches can go through your tree and I'll reposting
>> the second patch of [1] afterwards?
>
> I think you got all necessary acks for this pinctrl bindings change and
> the dependency ("add reset property"), so both can go via Linus' tree.
> That's preferred.
>
> DTS patches goes through your SoC maintainer tree.
Ah, ok, I wasn't aware of that. Then yes, please go ahead and
pick this and the first patch of [1] up, Linus.
Of course if you like you can pick the second patch of [1],
too. But I can also repost it without the RFC tag if that is
preferred.
-michael
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20220313154640.63813-1-michael@walle.cc/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-18 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-19 20:46 [PATCH v3 0/6] pinctrl: ocelot: convert to YAML format Michael Walle
2022-03-19 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] MIPS: mscc: jaguar2: rename pinctrl nodes Michael Walle
2022-03-19 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] MIPS: mscc: ocelot: " Michael Walle
2022-03-19 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] MIPS: mscc: serval: " Michael Walle
2022-03-19 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] arm64: dts: sparx5: " Michael Walle
2023-05-17 12:23 ` (subset) " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-03-19 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] ARM: dts: lan966x: " Michael Walle
2022-05-17 14:36 ` Nicolas Ferre
2022-03-19 20:46 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: convert ocelot-pinctrl to YAML format Michael Walle
2022-03-20 10:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-03-20 11:08 ` Michael Walle
2022-03-20 11:17 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-17 23:41 ` Linus Walleij
2022-04-18 8:16 ` Michael Walle
2022-04-18 8:19 ` Michael Walle
2022-04-18 11:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-18 12:04 ` Michael Walle [this message]
2022-04-19 22:33 ` Linus Walleij
2022-04-04 11:45 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] pinctrl: ocelot: convert " Michael Walle
2022-04-19 22:28 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=735863d6476605e4ff72032d8971ac0d@walle.cc \
--to=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=atenart@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=kavyasree.kotagiri@microchip.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=lars.povlsen@microchip.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=paulburton@kernel.org \
--cc=quentin.schulz@bootlin.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).