Re: [GIT PULL] intel-gpio for 5.14-1

[Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>]

Hi,

On 7/5/21 11:03 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 5:09 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 06:12:10PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> Hi Linux GPIO and TWIMC maintainers,
>>>
>>> This is GPIO material for v5.14 cycle. It contains some stuff that other
>>> subsystems may take due to dependencies. Consider this tag immutable.
>>
>> Bart, any comments on this? Can you, please, pull?
>>
>> --
>> With Best Regards,
>> Andy Shevchenko
>>
>>
> 
> Hi Andy,
> 
> I was looking for you PR for this cycle and couldn't find it in my
> inbox. Somehow this went into spam. I'll make sure your email never
> goes to spam again. Sorry. I'm seeing Hand pulled it, is that right?
> 
> Hans: did you take the entire thing?

Andy send me a pull-req for the intel-gpio-v5.14-1 tag because that
contained some dependencies for a new driver which I was merging into
drivers/platform/x86.

Given the name of the tag (and the contents) I think it is the entire
thing and not a topic branch with just the things which the driver needed,
I assume the pull-req Andy send to you probably also was for that tag?

If that is right then this indeed has already landed in Linus' tree
through the platform-drivers-x86 tree.

I specifically merged this:

"""
Tag: intel-gpio-v5.14-1
object 043d7f09bf614809c10c4acbf0695ef731958300
type commit
tag intel-gpio-v5.14-1
tagger Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> 1623078244 +0300

intel-gpio for v5.14-1

* Export two functions from GPIO ACPI for wider use
* Clean up Whiskey Cove and Crystal Cove GPIO drivers

The following is an automated git shortlog grouped by driver:

crystalcove:
 -  remove platform_set_drvdata() + cleanup probe

gpiolib:
 -  acpi: Add acpi_gpio_get_io_resource()
 -  acpi: Introduce acpi_get_and_request_gpiod() helper

wcove:
 -  Split error handling for CTRL and IRQ registers
 -  Unify style of to_reg() with to_ireg()
 -  Use IRQ hardware number getter instead of direct access
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=WHpx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
"""

Regards,

Hans