From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnaud Patard (Rtp) Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/5] gpio: iop: convert to use basic mmio gpio library Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:39:45 +0100 Message-ID: <87387g5d9a.fsf@lebrac.rtp-net.org> References: <1417435778-21879-1-git-send-email-kamlakant.patel@linaro.org> <1417435778-21879-4-git-send-email-kamlakant.patel@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from lebrac.rtp-net.org ([195.154.106.105]:59519 "EHLO lebrac.rtp-net.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751675AbbALNsM (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:48:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Linus Walleij's message of "Fri, 9 Jan 2015 10:19:11 +0100") Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Kamlakant Patel , Lennert Buytenhek , Alexandre Courbot , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Dan Williams , Mikael Pettersson Linus Walleij writes: Hi, > Lennert/Arnaud: is any one of you guys still maintaining and testing > IOP stuff so you can say something about this patch? I'm still using my iop(80219) system to do backups. So, on the good side, I still care about it, but on the bad side, it's not easy for me to test kernels on it. > > Or should I just apply it? I would prefer that some testing is done before applying. I just don't know when I'll be able to do. Maybe it's easier for Lennert to test it ? Arnaud