From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Jarzmik Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: make more mach/*.h files local Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 08:22:34 +0100 Message-ID: <87a8pu7hvp.fsf@belgarion.home> References: <1905725.SU2iekYqHg@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from smtp04.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.126]:41363 "EHLO smtp.smtpout.orange.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755173AbbLAHWi (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Dec 2015 02:22:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1905725.SU2iekYqHg@wuerfel> (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Mon, 30 Nov 2015 15:53:01 +0100") Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Linus Walleij , Daniel Mack , Haojian Zhuang , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Arnd Bergmann writes: > Lots of header files are never included outside of a mach-pxa > directory and do not need to be made visible in include/mach, > so let's just move them all down one level. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > --- > I've been carrying patches like this one in my multiplatform series > for a while, the PXA one is the largest. > > I'd like to merge that for 4.5, any objections? No, I like this very much. Acked-by: Robert Jarzmik > Do you want to take it into a PXA branch to avoid conflicts, or should > I put it into arm-soc directly? I don't have any patch so far queued for v4.5, so please take it, I think I'll skip v4.5 pull. Cheers. -- Robert