From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Gamari Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] gpio: add GPIO hogging mechanism Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:26:54 -0400 Message-ID: <87a95uylld.fsf@gmail.com> References: <1387463671-1164-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon@overkiz.com> <1387463671-1164-2-git-send-email-b.brezillon@overkiz.com> <20131219164109.GB27409@kroah.com> <87fvfmynw0.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87fvfmynw0.fsf@gmail.com> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Boris BREZILLON Cc: Rob Landley , Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot , Jiri Prchal , Mark Rutland , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Ben Gamari writes: > Hi Boris, > > I'm just returning to this now. > > > Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: > >> I don't understand what makes GPIO's "special" enough to get included in >> the driver core like this, and called for each and every device that is >> added to the system. >> > I'm also a bit confused why GPIOs ended up in the driver core but > perhaps I'm missing something. What was your motivation here? > Somehow I overlooked the message in which you responded to this. Ignore the above. Cheers, - Ben --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUHf8uAAoJEErkyLZmeNiDA3QH+wRXGjXScBmI5Urn09LLfQX+ XSkYi9g9MB93LRhdpHdJ5RINzR4BdfqmUXn6M8oia16OiaoxMHdA/o5HmJGUWYBr 5+gf4wAkc7xtefV2KMmkeH44u7tpdpLvyRv/NALdSjsl68fefk8k+q6/LqrSOmOH 0Dqz6rq6TvEHoONoX6yzs1cgl3zTXdIxmQYgL44w/+q6vQRjEkOiXUV/0LRY+EkD jex4wmKbfPVdHATLw5Rn9CIaLFMBXHb/GaynSEOtpzLicClKgwgUQn4iVuniMvp/ /gbymKQy5dxfztLqmdD8H46YWC1CtbWQNUqlOue3EMkH2edAQ/mRC/pPWFnIcGY= =UOUS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--