From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Gamari Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] gpio: add GPIO hogging mechanism Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 17:37:19 -0400 Message-ID: <87fvfmynw0.fsf@gmail.com> References: <1387463671-1164-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon@overkiz.com> <1387463671-1164-2-git-send-email-b.brezillon@overkiz.com> <20131219164109.GB27409@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131219164109.GB27409@kroah.com> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Boris BREZILLON Cc: Rob Landley , Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot , Jiri Prchal , Mark Rutland , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hi Boris, I'm just returning to this now. Greg Kroah-Hartman writes: > I don't understand what makes GPIO's "special" enough to get included in > the driver core like this, and called for each and every device that is > added to the system. > I'm also a bit confused why GPIOs ended up in the driver core but perhaps I'm missing something. What was your motivation here? Cheers, - Ben --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUHfOPAAoJEErkyLZmeNiD/ucIAKfJqb41jB7GYeFrwAQ6nP0L M7s45uYdzwLj4OSd2UAxqZ+4wOcFRs8pim78cGIhelnVa/da94WYLiUARLW80OPq yZQ4xZY5c1O1tI882lvsiE1lmHLKtlm4mzfQPjJ0xHgmBnF/kfkbsOIL3qHofiau Tvd5GBBEIc2KpIk7pN8QR1X1sNS5QUembBeVARA8QDZeEiOuLUUYA1UZbRQr2iFd jrwW1W6E3yji31Get4SB7TDTMtsunu5o8XnX0KSaEeqK5TZylHVTELcJX8gehetJ XrMO1Z9H20+sION0d4M8gHyfIC04G1q+aSsIrqje3iQuFlQDqMBr7VP0otxW4/4= =KM9x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--