linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	linusw@kernel.org, kaloz@openwrt.org, khalasa@piap.pl,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 2/5] gpio: ixp4xx: Make irqchip immutable
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:17:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87illfkbtk.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMRc=MexqLhu3ZWt1AbzBestswqmHNpct1LQiif0JGECTjHz4Q@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Bartosz,

On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 21:04:27 +0100,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 6:57 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 2022-09-21 16:54, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > >
> > > [ Upstream commit 94e9bc73d85aa6ecfe249e985ff57abe0ab35f34 ]
> > >
> > > This turns the IXP4xx GPIO irqchip into an immutable
> > > irqchip, a bit different from the standard template due
> > > to being hierarchical.
> > >
> > > Tested on the IXP4xx which uses drivers/ata/pata_ixp4xx_cf.c
> > > for a rootfs on compact flash with IRQs from this GPIO
> > > block to the CF ATA controller.
> > >
> > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
> > > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
> >
> > Why? The required dependencies are only in 5,19, and are
> > definitely NOT a stable candidate...
> >
> > This isn't a fix by any stretch of the imagination.
> >
> 
> Hi Marc,
> 
> While I didn't mark it for stable (and it shouldn't go into any branch
> earlier than 5.19.x), I did send the patches making the irqchips
> immutable to Linus Torvalds as fixes as they technically do *fix* the
> warning emitted by gpiolib and make the implementation correct.
> 
> I think these patches should still be part of the v5.19.x stable branch.

5.19, sure. All the dependencies are there, and tightening the driver
implementations is a valuable goal.

However, targeting all the other stable releases (5.4, 5.10, 5.15)
makes little sense. It won't even compile! Do the dependencies need to
be backported? I don't think it is worthwhile, as this is a long
series containing multiple related changes spread all over the tree.
This would defeat the very purpose of a stable tree.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-22  9:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20220921155436.235371-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2022-09-21 15:54 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 2/5] gpio: ixp4xx: Make irqchip immutable Sasha Levin
2022-09-21 16:57   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-21 20:04     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-09-22  9:17       ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2022-09-22  9:22         ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-09-25  3:17       ` Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87illfkbtk.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=kaloz@openwrt.org \
    --cc=khalasa@piap.pl \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linusw@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).