linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Timestamp events in hardirq handler
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 15:53:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lggolm0x.fsf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdY2U1N+xHAKjxjAEzD-hMuDCveYuxOLNzyy=x8N+CiiLQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 945 bytes --]


Hi,

Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 1:37 PM, Felipe Balbi
> <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> writes:
>>> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Alexander Stein
>>> <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thursday, November 30, 2017, 10:26:55 AM CET Linus Walleij wrote:
>>>
>>>>> +     s64 timestamp;
>>>>     ^^^
>>>> u64? ktime_get_real_ns() returns u64 and struct gpioevent_data
>>>> has __u64 for timestamp.
>>>
>>> OK sorry, fixing it. Thanks for noticing!
>>
>> This is not on next. Will it miss this merge window?
>
> I realized yesterday when doing a security fix that it was missing.
>
> Because I didn't get the merge conflict I expected :D
>
> So I merged it. Don't worry. Sorry for the fuzz!

No problem, I'll refetch linux-next tomorrow or the day after and start
testing it.

Thanks

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2018-01-23 13:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-30  9:26 [PATCH] gpio: Timestamp events in hardirq handler Linus Walleij
2017-11-30  9:32 ` Felipe Balbi
2017-11-30  9:48   ` Linus Walleij
2017-11-30  9:46 ` Alexander Stein
2017-11-30  9:49   ` Linus Walleij
2018-01-23 12:37     ` Felipe Balbi
2018-01-23 13:42       ` Linus Walleij
2018-01-23 13:53         ` Felipe Balbi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87lggolm0x.fsf@linux.intel.com \
    --to=felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).