linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Jacky Huang <ychuang3@nuvoton.com>,
	 Shan-Chun Hung <schung@nuvoton.com>,
	 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	 Steam Lin <stlin2@winbond.com>,
	 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,  stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: nuvoton: Fix boot on ma35dx platforms
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 10:51:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tt4gnk69.fsf@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VcfaU41FV-uN=82GdUqRadxYc6XaLX2Hr9x-4RfAV8CEg@mail.gmail.com> (Andy Shevchenko's message of "Sat, 14 Jun 2025 00:07:51 +0300")

Hi Andy,

On 14/06/2025 at 00:07:51 +03, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 9:13 PM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
>>
>> As part of a wider cleanup trying to get rid of OF specific APIs, an
>> incorrect (and partially unrelated) cleanup was introduced.
>>
>> The goal was to replace a device_for_each_chil_node() loop including an
>> additional condition inside by a macro doing both the loop and the
>> check on a single line.
>>
>> The snippet:
>>
>>         device_for_each_child_node(dev, child)
>>                 if (fwnode_property_present(child, "gpio-controller"))
>>                         continue;
>>
>> was replaced by:
>>
>>         for_each_gpiochip_node(dev, child)
>>
>> which expands into:
>>
>>         device_for_each_child_node(dev, child)
>>                 for_each_if(fwnode_property_present(child, "gpio-controller"))
>>
>> This change is actually doing the opposite of what was initially
>> expected, breaking the probe of this driver, breaking at the same time
>> the whole boot of Nuvoton platforms (no more console, the kernel WARN()).
>>
>> Revert these two changes to roll back to the correct behavior.
>
> Thank you for the report and the fix.
> Can we also add a comment on top of each of these if:s to prevent from
> blind change in the future?

I believe it's fine like that, The difference is subtle, it is okay and
unavoidable to make this kind of small mistake sometimes.

Cheers,
Miquèl

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-16  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-13 18:13 [PATCH] pinctrl: nuvoton: Fix boot on ma35dx platforms Miquel Raynal
2025-06-13 21:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-16  8:51   ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2025-06-18 12:30 ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87tt4gnk69.fsf@bootlin.com \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schung@nuvoton.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stlin2@winbond.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=ychuang3@nuvoton.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).