linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Drop unused domain_ops memeber of GPIO IRQ chip
@ 2023-06-16 13:53 Andy Shevchenko
  2023-06-17  9:08 ` Linus Walleij
  2023-06-19 13:01 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2023-06-16 13:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bartosz Golaszewski, Andy Shevchenko, linux-gpio, linux-kernel
  Cc: Linus Walleij, Bartosz Golaszewski, Andy Shevchenko

It seems there is no driver that requires custom IRQ chip
domain options. Drop the member and respective code.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c      | 3 +--
 include/linux/gpio/driver.h | 7 -------
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 5fb64c7d7473..4b404beddcf2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -1668,11 +1668,10 @@ static int gpiochip_add_irqchip(struct gpio_chip *gc,
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 	} else {
-		/* Some drivers provide custom irqdomain ops */
 		gc->irq.domain = irq_domain_create_simple(fwnode,
 			gc->ngpio,
 			gc->irq.first,
-			gc->irq.domain_ops ?: &gpiochip_domain_ops,
+			&gpiochip_domain_ops,
 			gc);
 		if (!gc->irq.domain)
 			return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
index 5c6db5533be6..6879b5436480 100644
--- a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
+++ b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
@@ -61,13 +61,6 @@ struct gpio_irq_chip {
 	 */
 	struct irq_domain *domain;
 
-	/**
-	 * @domain_ops:
-	 *
-	 * Table of interrupt domain operations for this IRQ chip.
-	 */
-	const struct irq_domain_ops *domain_ops;
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
 	/**
 	 * @fwnode:
-- 
2.40.0.1.gaa8946217a0b


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Drop unused domain_ops memeber of GPIO IRQ chip
  2023-06-16 13:53 [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Drop unused domain_ops memeber of GPIO IRQ chip Andy Shevchenko
@ 2023-06-17  9:08 ` Linus Walleij
  2023-06-17 10:23   ` Marc Zyngier
  2023-06-19 13:01 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2023-06-17  9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Shevchenko, Marc Zyngier, Thierry Reding
  Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski, linux-gpio, linux-kernel,
	Bartosz Golaszewski, Andy Shevchenko

On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 3:53 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> It seems there is no driver that requires custom IRQ chip
> domain options. Drop the member and respective code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
(...)
> -               /* Some drivers provide custom irqdomain ops */
>                 gc->irq.domain = irq_domain_create_simple(fwnode,
>                         gc->ngpio,
>                         gc->irq.first,
> -                       gc->irq.domain_ops ?: &gpiochip_domain_ops,
> +                       &gpiochip_domain_ops,

We better run this by Marc Zyngier, and Thierry who introduced it.

But some grepping and looking seems to conclude you are righ!
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Drop unused domain_ops memeber of GPIO IRQ chip
  2023-06-17  9:08 ` Linus Walleij
@ 2023-06-17 10:23   ` Marc Zyngier
  2023-06-19 10:41     ` Andy Shevchenko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2023-06-17 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linus Walleij
  Cc: Andy Shevchenko, Thierry Reding, Bartosz Golaszewski, linux-gpio,
	linux-kernel, Bartosz Golaszewski, Andy Shevchenko

On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 10:08:10 +0100,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 3:53 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > It seems there is no driver that requires custom IRQ chip
> > domain options. Drop the member and respective code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> (...)
> > -               /* Some drivers provide custom irqdomain ops */
> >                 gc->irq.domain = irq_domain_create_simple(fwnode,
> >                         gc->ngpio,
> >                         gc->irq.first,
> > -                       gc->irq.domain_ops ?: &gpiochip_domain_ops,
> > +                       &gpiochip_domain_ops,
> 
> We better run this by Marc Zyngier, and Thierry who introduced it.
> 
> But some grepping and looking seems to conclude you are righ!
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

No objection from my end. If this is unused, let's kill it.

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Drop unused domain_ops memeber of GPIO IRQ chip
  2023-06-17 10:23   ` Marc Zyngier
@ 2023-06-19 10:41     ` Andy Shevchenko
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2023-06-19 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marc Zyngier
  Cc: Linus Walleij, Thierry Reding, Bartosz Golaszewski, linux-gpio,
	linux-kernel, Bartosz Golaszewski

On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 11:23:17AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 10:08:10 +0100,
> Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 3:53 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:

(...)

> > > -               /* Some drivers provide custom irqdomain ops */
> > >                 gc->irq.domain = irq_domain_create_simple(fwnode,
> > >                         gc->ngpio,
> > >                         gc->irq.first,
> > > -                       gc->irq.domain_ops ?: &gpiochip_domain_ops,
> > > +                       &gpiochip_domain_ops,
> > 
> > We better run this by Marc Zyngier, and Thierry who introduced it.
> > 
> > But some grepping and looking seems to conclude you are righ!
> > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> 
> No objection from my end. If this is unused, let's kill it.

Grepping by two independent people and so far no complains from CI, I believe
the patch tells truth.

> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

Thank you!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Drop unused domain_ops memeber of GPIO IRQ chip
  2023-06-16 13:53 [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Drop unused domain_ops memeber of GPIO IRQ chip Andy Shevchenko
  2023-06-17  9:08 ` Linus Walleij
@ 2023-06-19 13:01 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bartosz Golaszewski @ 2023-06-19 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Shevchenko
  Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, Linus Walleij,
	Andy Shevchenko

On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 3:53 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> It seems there is no driver that requires custom IRQ chip
> domain options. Drop the member and respective code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---

Applied, thanks!

Bart

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-06-19 13:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-06-16 13:53 [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Drop unused domain_ops memeber of GPIO IRQ chip Andy Shevchenko
2023-06-17  9:08 ` Linus Walleij
2023-06-17 10:23   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-06-19 10:41     ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-06-19 13:01 ` Bartosz Golaszewski

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).