From: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
To: Rojhalat Ibrahim <imr@rtschenk.de>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] gpiolib: add gpiod_get_array and gpiod_put_array functions
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 23:24:50 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAVeFu+PGceYEvUmFKLW3NfPoomeTaeZ678o2nHn--bP0RJcwA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6594257.m7JYREYCDP@pcimr>
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Rojhalat Ibrahim <imr@rtschenk.de> wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 February 2015 22:31:12 Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Rojhalat Ibrahim <imr@rtschenk.de> wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 11 February 2015 12:30:01 Mika Westerberg wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 02:40:52PM +0100, Rojhalat Ibrahim wrote:
>> >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> >> > +
>> >> > +static unsigned int acpi_gpio_package_count(const union acpi_object *obj)
>> >> > +{
>> >> > + const union acpi_object *element = obj->package.elements;
>> >> > + const union acpi_object *end = element + obj->package.count;
>> >> > + unsigned int count = 0;
>> >> > +
>> >> > + while (element < end) {
>> >> > + if (element->type == ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE)
>> >> > + count++;
>> >> > +
>> >> > + element++;
>> >> > + }
>> >> > + return count;
>> >> > +}
>> >> > +
>> >> > +static int acpi_find_gpio_count(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
>> >> > +{
>> >> > + unsigned int *count = data;
>> >> > +
>> >> > + if (ares->type == ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_GPIO)
>> >> > + *count += ares->data.gpio.pin_table_length;
>> >> > +
>> >> > + return 1;
>> >> > +}
>> >> > +
>> >> > +static int acpi_gpio_count(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
>> >> > +{
>> >> > + struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
>> >> > + const union acpi_object *obj;
>> >> > + const struct acpi_gpio_mapping *gm;
>> >> > + int count = -ENOENT;
>> >> > + int ret;
>> >> > + char propname[32];
>> >> > + unsigned int i;
>> >> > +
>> >> > + /* Try first from _DSD */
>> >> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(gpio_suffixes); i++) {
>> >> > + if (con_id && strcmp(con_id, "gpios"))
>> >> > + snprintf(propname, sizeof(propname), "%s-%s",
>> >> > + con_id, gpio_suffixes[i]);
>> >> > + else
>> >> > + snprintf(propname, sizeof(propname), "%s",
>> >> > + gpio_suffixes[i]);
>> >> > +
>> >> > + ret = acpi_dev_get_property(adev, propname, ACPI_TYPE_ANY,
>> >> > + &obj);
>> >> > + if (ret == 0) {
>> >> > + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE)
>> >> > + count = 1;
>> >> > + else if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE)
>> >> > + count = acpi_gpio_package_count(obj);
>> >> > + } else if (adev->driver_gpios) {
>> >> > + for (gm = adev->driver_gpios; gm->name; gm++)
>> >> > + if (strcmp(propname, gm->name) == 0) {
>> >> > + count = gm->size;
>> >> > + break;
>> >> > + }
>> >> > + }
>> >> > + if (count >= 0)
>> >> > + break;
>> >> > + }
>> >> > +
>> >> > + /* Then from plain _CRS GPIOs */
>> >> > + if (count < 0) {
>> >> > + struct list_head resource_list;
>> >> > + unsigned int crs_count = 0;
>> >> > +
>> >> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
>> >> > + acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &resource_list,
>> >> > + acpi_find_gpio_count, &crs_count);
>> >> > + acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
>> >> > + if (crs_count > 0)
>> >> > + count = crs_count;
>> >> > + }
>> >> > + return count;
>> >> > +}
>> >> > +
>> >> > +#else
>> >> > +
>> >> > +static int acpi_gpio_count(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
>> >> > +{
>> >> > + return -ENODEV;
>> >> > +}
>> >> > +
>> >> > +#endif
>> >>
>> >> It just occured to me that it would be better to put this code to
>> >> gpiolib-acpi.c and declare acpi_gpio_count() in drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Ok. I will also have to move the definition of gpio_suffixes[] (PATCH 1/4)
>> > to drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h since it is needed by both the OF and the ACPI
>> > portions of the code.
>>
>> We will really need to factorize this lookup code. I will give it a
>> look, but first I'd like to merge this good stuff.
>>
>> I am mixed about moving these declarations into gpiolib.h - maybe have
>> one static declaration per file instead, especially since lookup on
>> ACPI is not necessarily the same as lookup on DT. It makes sense to
>> have it that way.
>>
>
> If we do one static declaration per file then acpi_find_gpio() in gpiolib.c
> is going to use potentially different suffixes from acpi_gpio_count() in
> gpiolib-acpi.c. That can't be good.
Yeah it's a bit of a mess, I really need to reorganize that code...
I'm not going to mind how you do it - just do whatever seems good to
you, I will revisit it later anyway. For now I'd like this
well-implemented and tested interface to be merged for everyone to
enjoy.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-11 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-10 13:40 [PATCH v4 2/4] gpiolib: add gpiod_get_array and gpiod_put_array functions Rojhalat Ibrahim
2015-02-11 10:30 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-02-11 12:14 ` Rojhalat Ibrahim
2015-02-11 13:31 ` Alexandre Courbot
2015-02-11 14:00 ` Rojhalat Ibrahim
2015-02-11 14:19 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-02-11 14:24 ` Alexandre Courbot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAVeFu+PGceYEvUmFKLW3NfPoomeTaeZ678o2nHn--bP0RJcwA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=imr@rtschenk.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).