From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Courbot Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: SAMSUNG: remove gpio flags in dev-backlight Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 15:07:50 +0900 Message-ID: References: <1393480414-19473-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <1393480414-19473-2-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <000701cf54a2$7c1379c0$743a6d40$%han@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jingoo Han , Ben Dooks , Kukjin Kim , Thierry Reding Cc: Alexandre Courbot , Bryan Wu , "linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Jingoo Han wrote: >> On Thursday, April 10, 2014 1:17 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >>> >>> Ping, can I have the Samsung folks review and ,aybe even merge this >>> patch? enable_gpio_flags is never used in any code, is replaced by >>> gpiod, and we would like to remove it altogether from pwm_bl. Thanks! >> >> OK, I see. It looks good. >> >> As far as I know, 'enable_gpio_flags' has not been being used >> for Samsung platform. So, there will be no side effect, >> if 'enable_gpio_flags' is removed from 'arch/arm/plat-samsung' >> directory. >> >> Reviewed-by: Jingoo Han > > Great, thanks. Ben, Kukjin, could we have your Acked-by? > > Thierry, if the Samsung maintainers are ok with it, and 2/2 of this > series is also ok for you (you merged the same for simple-panel > already), can you take both into your tree? Last call - could we have a Acked-by from Ben or Kukjin and merge this through Thierry's tree? Otherwise I will just have to drop this series, which would be sad.