* [PATCH V2 0/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Modification of UNISOC Platform PMIC EIC Driver
@ 2023-09-21 12:25 Wenhua Lin
2023-09-21 12:25 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Two-dimensional arrays maintain pmic eic Wenhua Lin
2023-09-21 12:25 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Add can_sleep flag for PMIC EIC chip Wenhua Lin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Wenhua Lin @ 2023-09-21 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Walleij, Andy Shevchenko, Bartosz Golaszewski
Cc: Orson Zhai, Baolin Wang, Chunyan Zhang, linux-gpio, linux-kernel,
wenhua lin, Wenhua Lin, Xiongpeng Wu
Recently, some bugs have been discovered during use, and patch1
and patch2 are bug fixes.
Change in V2:
-Change commit message and title in PATCH 1/2.
-PATCH 2/2 add can_sleep flag for PMIC EIC chip
split into a separate patch in PATCH 1/2.
-Delete the modification of IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW.
Wenhua Lin (2):
gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Two-dimensional arrays maintain pmic eic
gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Add can_sleep flag for PMIC EIC chip
drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V2 1/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Two-dimensional arrays maintain pmic eic
2023-09-21 12:25 [PATCH V2 0/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Modification of UNISOC Platform PMIC EIC Driver Wenhua Lin
@ 2023-09-21 12:25 ` Wenhua Lin
2023-09-27 7:21 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
` (2 more replies)
2023-09-21 12:25 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Add can_sleep flag for PMIC EIC chip Wenhua Lin
1 sibling, 3 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Wenhua Lin @ 2023-09-21 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Walleij, Andy Shevchenko, Bartosz Golaszewski
Cc: Orson Zhai, Baolin Wang, Chunyan Zhang, linux-gpio, linux-kernel,
wenhua lin, Wenhua Lin, Xiongpeng Wu
A bank PMIC EIC contains 16 EICs, and the operating registers
are BIT0-BIT15, such as BIT0 of the register operated by EIC0.
Using the one-dimensional array reg[CACHE_NR_REGS] for maintenance
will cause the configuration of other EICs to be affected when
operating a certain EIC. In order to solve this problem, the register
operation bits of each PMIC EIC are maintained through the two-dimensional
array reg[SPRD_PMIC_EIC_NR][CACHE_NR_REGS] to avoid mutual interference.
Signed-off-by: Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@unisoc.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
index c3e4d90f6b18..442968bb2490 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ struct sprd_pmic_eic {
struct gpio_chip chip;
struct regmap *map;
u32 offset;
- u8 reg[CACHE_NR_REGS];
+ u8 reg[SPRD_PMIC_EIC_NR][CACHE_NR_REGS];
struct mutex buslock;
int irq;
};
@@ -151,8 +151,8 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
struct sprd_pmic_eic *pmic_eic = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
u32 offset = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
- pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] = 0;
- pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG] = 0;
+ pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE] = 0;
+ pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG] = 0;
gpiochip_disable_irq(chip, offset);
}
@@ -165,8 +165,8 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
gpiochip_enable_irq(chip, offset);
- pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] = 1;
- pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG] = 1;
+ pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE] = 1;
+ pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG] = 1;
}
static int sprd_pmic_eic_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data,
@@ -174,13 +174,14 @@ static int sprd_pmic_eic_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data,
{
struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
struct sprd_pmic_eic *pmic_eic = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+ u32 offset = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
switch (flow_type) {
case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
- pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] = 1;
+ pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV] = 1;
break;
case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
- pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] = 0;
+ pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV] = 0;
break;
case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
@@ -222,15 +223,15 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IEV, 1);
} else {
sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IEV,
- pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV]);
+ pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV]);
}
/* Set irq unmask */
sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IE,
- pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE]);
+ pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE]);
/* Generate trigger start pulse for debounce EIC */
sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_TRIG,
- pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG]);
+ pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG]);
mutex_unlock(&pmic_eic->buslock);
}
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V2 2/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Add can_sleep flag for PMIC EIC chip
2023-09-21 12:25 [PATCH V2 0/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Modification of UNISOC Platform PMIC EIC Driver Wenhua Lin
2023-09-21 12:25 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Two-dimensional arrays maintain pmic eic Wenhua Lin
@ 2023-09-21 12:25 ` Wenhua Lin
2023-09-21 15:39 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-09-27 9:05 ` Baolin Wang
1 sibling, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Wenhua Lin @ 2023-09-21 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Walleij, Andy Shevchenko, Bartosz Golaszewski
Cc: Orson Zhai, Baolin Wang, Chunyan Zhang, linux-gpio, linux-kernel,
wenhua lin, Wenhua Lin, Xiongpeng Wu
The drivers uses a mutex and I2C bus access in its PMIC EIC chip
get implementation. This means these functions can sleep and the PMIC EIC
chip should set the can_sleep property to true.
This will ensure that a warning is printed when trying to get the
value from a context that potentially can't sleep.
Signed-off-by: Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@unisoc.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
index 442968bb2490..f04a40288638 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
@@ -353,6 +353,7 @@ static int sprd_pmic_eic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
pmic_eic->chip.set_config = sprd_pmic_eic_set_config;
pmic_eic->chip.set = sprd_pmic_eic_set;
pmic_eic->chip.get = sprd_pmic_eic_get;
+ pmic_eic->chip.can_sleep = true;
irq = &pmic_eic->chip.irq;
gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(irq, &pmic_eic_irq_chip);
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Add can_sleep flag for PMIC EIC chip
2023-09-21 12:25 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Add can_sleep flag for PMIC EIC chip Wenhua Lin
@ 2023-09-21 15:39 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-09-27 7:13 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-09-27 9:05 ` Baolin Wang
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2023-09-21 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wenhua Lin
Cc: Linus Walleij, Bartosz Golaszewski, Orson Zhai, Baolin Wang,
Chunyan Zhang, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, wenhua lin, Xiongpeng Wu
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 08:25:27PM +0800, Wenhua Lin wrote:
> The drivers uses a mutex and I2C bus access in its PMIC EIC chip
> get implementation. This means these functions can sleep and the PMIC EIC
> chip should set the can_sleep property to true.
>
> This will ensure that a warning is printed when trying to get the
> value from a context that potentially can't sleep.
This deserves a Fixes tag.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Add can_sleep flag for PMIC EIC chip
2023-09-21 15:39 ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2023-09-27 7:13 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Bartosz Golaszewski @ 2023-09-27 7:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Shevchenko
Cc: Wenhua Lin, Linus Walleij, Orson Zhai, Baolin Wang, Chunyan Zhang,
linux-gpio, linux-kernel, wenhua lin, Xiongpeng Wu
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 5:40 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 08:25:27PM +0800, Wenhua Lin wrote:
> > The drivers uses a mutex and I2C bus access in its PMIC EIC chip
> > get implementation. This means these functions can sleep and the PMIC EIC
> > chip should set the can_sleep property to true.
> >
> > This will ensure that a warning is printed when trying to get the
> > value from a context that potentially can't sleep.
>
> This deserves a Fixes tag.
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
Added when applying and queued for fixes.
Bart
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Two-dimensional arrays maintain pmic eic
2023-09-21 12:25 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Two-dimensional arrays maintain pmic eic Wenhua Lin
@ 2023-09-27 7:21 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-09-27 9:04 ` Baolin Wang
2023-09-28 9:00 ` Chunyan Zhang
2 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Bartosz Golaszewski @ 2023-09-27 7:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wenhua Lin
Cc: Linus Walleij, Andy Shevchenko, Orson Zhai, Baolin Wang,
Chunyan Zhang, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, wenhua lin, Xiongpeng Wu
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 2:27 PM Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@unisoc.com> wrote:
>
> A bank PMIC EIC contains 16 EICs, and the operating registers
> are BIT0-BIT15, such as BIT0 of the register operated by EIC0.
> Using the one-dimensional array reg[CACHE_NR_REGS] for maintenance
> will cause the configuration of other EICs to be affected when
> operating a certain EIC. In order to solve this problem, the register
> operation bits of each PMIC EIC are maintained through the two-dimensional
> array reg[SPRD_PMIC_EIC_NR][CACHE_NR_REGS] to avoid mutual interference.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@unisoc.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> index c3e4d90f6b18..442968bb2490 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ struct sprd_pmic_eic {
> struct gpio_chip chip;
> struct regmap *map;
> u32 offset;
> - u8 reg[CACHE_NR_REGS];
> + u8 reg[SPRD_PMIC_EIC_NR][CACHE_NR_REGS];
> struct mutex buslock;
> int irq;
> };
> @@ -151,8 +151,8 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
> struct sprd_pmic_eic *pmic_eic = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> u32 offset = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
>
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] = 0;
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG] = 0;
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE] = 0;
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG] = 0;
>
> gpiochip_disable_irq(chip, offset);
> }
> @@ -165,8 +165,8 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
>
> gpiochip_enable_irq(chip, offset);
>
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] = 1;
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG] = 1;
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE] = 1;
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG] = 1;
> }
>
> static int sprd_pmic_eic_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data,
> @@ -174,13 +174,14 @@ static int sprd_pmic_eic_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data,
> {
> struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> struct sprd_pmic_eic *pmic_eic = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> + u32 offset = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
>
> switch (flow_type) {
> case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] = 1;
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV] = 1;
> break;
> case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] = 0;
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV] = 0;
> break;
> case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
> case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
> @@ -222,15 +223,15 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
> sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IEV, 1);
> } else {
> sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IEV,
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV]);
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV]);
> }
>
> /* Set irq unmask */
> sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IE,
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE]);
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE]);
> /* Generate trigger start pulse for debounce EIC */
> sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_TRIG,
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG]);
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG]);
>
> mutex_unlock(&pmic_eic->buslock);
> }
> --
> 2.17.1
>
This looks good to me but I want to let the SPRD maintainers
review/test it before applying.
Bart
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Two-dimensional arrays maintain pmic eic
2023-09-21 12:25 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Two-dimensional arrays maintain pmic eic Wenhua Lin
2023-09-27 7:21 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
@ 2023-09-27 9:04 ` Baolin Wang
2023-09-27 9:24 ` Chunyan Zhang
2023-09-28 9:00 ` Chunyan Zhang
2 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Baolin Wang @ 2023-09-27 9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wenhua Lin, Linus Walleij, Andy Shevchenko, Bartosz Golaszewski
Cc: Orson Zhai, Chunyan Zhang, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, wenhua lin,
Xiongpeng Wu
On 9/21/2023 8:25 PM, Wenhua Lin wrote:
> A bank PMIC EIC contains 16 EICs, and the operating registers
> are BIT0-BIT15, such as BIT0 of the register operated by EIC0.
> Using the one-dimensional array reg[CACHE_NR_REGS] for maintenance
> will cause the configuration of other EICs to be affected when
> operating a certain EIC. In order to solve this problem, the register
> operation bits of each PMIC EIC are maintained through the two-dimensional
> array reg[SPRD_PMIC_EIC_NR][CACHE_NR_REGS] to avoid mutual interference.
LGTM. And this also deserves a Fixes tag.
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@unisoc.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> index c3e4d90f6b18..442968bb2490 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ struct sprd_pmic_eic {
> struct gpio_chip chip;
> struct regmap *map;
> u32 offset;
> - u8 reg[CACHE_NR_REGS];
> + u8 reg[SPRD_PMIC_EIC_NR][CACHE_NR_REGS];
> struct mutex buslock;
> int irq;
> };
> @@ -151,8 +151,8 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
> struct sprd_pmic_eic *pmic_eic = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> u32 offset = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
>
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] = 0;
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG] = 0;
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE] = 0;
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG] = 0;
>
> gpiochip_disable_irq(chip, offset);
> }
> @@ -165,8 +165,8 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
>
> gpiochip_enable_irq(chip, offset);
>
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] = 1;
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG] = 1;
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE] = 1;
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG] = 1;
> }
>
> static int sprd_pmic_eic_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data,
> @@ -174,13 +174,14 @@ static int sprd_pmic_eic_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data,
> {
> struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> struct sprd_pmic_eic *pmic_eic = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> + u32 offset = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
>
> switch (flow_type) {
> case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] = 1;
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV] = 1;
> break;
> case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] = 0;
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV] = 0;
> break;
> case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
> case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
> @@ -222,15 +223,15 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
> sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IEV, 1);
> } else {
> sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IEV,
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV]);
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV]);
> }
>
> /* Set irq unmask */
> sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IE,
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE]);
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE]);
> /* Generate trigger start pulse for debounce EIC */
> sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_TRIG,
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG]);
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG]);
>
> mutex_unlock(&pmic_eic->buslock);
> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Add can_sleep flag for PMIC EIC chip
2023-09-21 12:25 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Add can_sleep flag for PMIC EIC chip Wenhua Lin
2023-09-21 15:39 ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2023-09-27 9:05 ` Baolin Wang
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Baolin Wang @ 2023-09-27 9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wenhua Lin, Linus Walleij, Andy Shevchenko, Bartosz Golaszewski
Cc: Orson Zhai, Chunyan Zhang, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, wenhua lin,
Xiongpeng Wu
On 9/21/2023 8:25 PM, Wenhua Lin wrote:
> The drivers uses a mutex and I2C bus access in its PMIC EIC chip
> get implementation. This means these functions can sleep and the PMIC EIC
> chip should set the can_sleep property to true.
>
> This will ensure that a warning is printed when trying to get the
> value from a context that potentially can't sleep.
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@unisoc.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> index 442968bb2490..f04a40288638 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> @@ -353,6 +353,7 @@ static int sprd_pmic_eic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> pmic_eic->chip.set_config = sprd_pmic_eic_set_config;
> pmic_eic->chip.set = sprd_pmic_eic_set;
> pmic_eic->chip.get = sprd_pmic_eic_get;
> + pmic_eic->chip.can_sleep = true;
>
> irq = &pmic_eic->chip.irq;
> gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(irq, &pmic_eic_irq_chip);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Two-dimensional arrays maintain pmic eic
2023-09-27 9:04 ` Baolin Wang
@ 2023-09-27 9:24 ` Chunyan Zhang
2023-09-27 9:49 ` Baolin Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Chunyan Zhang @ 2023-09-27 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Baolin Wang
Cc: Wenhua Lin, Linus Walleij, Andy Shevchenko, Bartosz Golaszewski,
Orson Zhai, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, wenhua lin, Xiongpeng Wu
On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 17:04, Baolin Wang
<baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/21/2023 8:25 PM, Wenhua Lin wrote:
> > A bank PMIC EIC contains 16 EICs, and the operating registers
> > are BIT0-BIT15, such as BIT0 of the register operated by EIC0.
> > Using the one-dimensional array reg[CACHE_NR_REGS] for maintenance
> > will cause the configuration of other EICs to be affected when
> > operating a certain EIC. In order to solve this problem, the register
> > operation bits of each PMIC EIC are maintained through the two-dimensional
> > array reg[SPRD_PMIC_EIC_NR][CACHE_NR_REGS] to avoid mutual interference.
>
> LGTM. And this also deserves a Fixes tag.
Do we really need a two-dimensional array to save 16-bit value?
> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@unisoc.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> > index c3e4d90f6b18..442968bb2490 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> > @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ struct sprd_pmic_eic {
> > struct gpio_chip chip;
> > struct regmap *map;
> > u32 offset;
> > - u8 reg[CACHE_NR_REGS];
> > + u8 reg[SPRD_PMIC_EIC_NR][CACHE_NR_REGS];
> > struct mutex buslock;
> > int irq;
> > };
> > @@ -151,8 +151,8 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
> > struct sprd_pmic_eic *pmic_eic = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> > u32 offset = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
> >
> > - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] = 0;
> > - pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG] = 0;
> > + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE] = 0;
> > + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG] = 0;
> >
> > gpiochip_disable_irq(chip, offset);
> > }
> > @@ -165,8 +165,8 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
> >
> > gpiochip_enable_irq(chip, offset);
> >
> > - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] = 1;
> > - pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG] = 1;
> > + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE] = 1;
> > + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG] = 1;
> > }
> >
> > static int sprd_pmic_eic_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data,
> > @@ -174,13 +174,14 @@ static int sprd_pmic_eic_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data,
> > {
> > struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> > struct sprd_pmic_eic *pmic_eic = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> > + u32 offset = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
> >
> > switch (flow_type) {
> > case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
> > - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] = 1;
> > + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV] = 1;
> > break;
> > case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
> > - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] = 0;
> > + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV] = 0;
> > break;
> > case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
> > case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
> > @@ -222,15 +223,15 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
> > sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IEV, 1);
> > } else {
> > sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IEV,
> > - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV]);
> > + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV]);
> > }
> >
> > /* Set irq unmask */
> > sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IE,
> > - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE]);
> > + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE]);
> > /* Generate trigger start pulse for debounce EIC */
> > sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_TRIG,
> > - pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG]);
> > + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG]);
> >
> > mutex_unlock(&pmic_eic->buslock);
> > }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Two-dimensional arrays maintain pmic eic
2023-09-27 9:24 ` Chunyan Zhang
@ 2023-09-27 9:49 ` Baolin Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Baolin Wang @ 2023-09-27 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chunyan Zhang
Cc: Wenhua Lin, Linus Walleij, Andy Shevchenko, Bartosz Golaszewski,
Orson Zhai, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, wenhua lin, Xiongpeng Wu
On 9/27/2023 5:24 PM, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 17:04, Baolin Wang
> <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/21/2023 8:25 PM, Wenhua Lin wrote:
>>> A bank PMIC EIC contains 16 EICs, and the operating registers
>>> are BIT0-BIT15, such as BIT0 of the register operated by EIC0.
>>> Using the one-dimensional array reg[CACHE_NR_REGS] for maintenance
>>> will cause the configuration of other EICs to be affected when
>>> operating a certain EIC. In order to solve this problem, the register
>>> operation bits of each PMIC EIC are maintained through the two-dimensional
>>> array reg[SPRD_PMIC_EIC_NR][CACHE_NR_REGS] to avoid mutual interference.
>>
>> LGTM. And this also deserves a Fixes tag.
>
> Do we really need a two-dimensional array to save 16-bit value?
I also considering this, but after more thinking, I think this patch is
a simple fix.
Now I realized the problem is that, if we use one array to cache a bank
of EICs' status, the pmic_eic->reg[] array can contain incorrect
configuration for other EICs in the same bank.
Yes, we can have another fix, for example, setting the pmic_eic->reg[]
to some invalid values (maybe -1) in sprd_pmic_eic_bus_sync_unlock()
after setting one EIC. Thus when setting another EIC, we can validate if
the cached reg is a valid value, if not, we do not need to set the
register. But like I said above, this seems more complicated.
>> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@unisoc.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
>>> index c3e4d90f6b18..442968bb2490 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
>>> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ struct sprd_pmic_eic {
>>> struct gpio_chip chip;
>>> struct regmap *map;
>>> u32 offset;
>>> - u8 reg[CACHE_NR_REGS];
>>> + u8 reg[SPRD_PMIC_EIC_NR][CACHE_NR_REGS];
>>> struct mutex buslock;
>>> int irq;
>>> };
>>> @@ -151,8 +151,8 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
>>> struct sprd_pmic_eic *pmic_eic = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
>>> u32 offset = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
>>>
>>> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] = 0;
>>> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG] = 0;
>>> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE] = 0;
>>> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG] = 0;
>>>
>>> gpiochip_disable_irq(chip, offset);
>>> }
>>> @@ -165,8 +165,8 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
>>>
>>> gpiochip_enable_irq(chip, offset);
>>>
>>> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] = 1;
>>> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG] = 1;
>>> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE] = 1;
>>> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG] = 1;
>>> }
>>>
>>> static int sprd_pmic_eic_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data,
>>> @@ -174,13 +174,14 @@ static int sprd_pmic_eic_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data,
>>> {
>>> struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
>>> struct sprd_pmic_eic *pmic_eic = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
>>> + u32 offset = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
>>>
>>> switch (flow_type) {
>>> case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
>>> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] = 1;
>>> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV] = 1;
>>> break;
>>> case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
>>> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] = 0;
>>> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV] = 0;
>>> break;
>>> case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
>>> case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
>>> @@ -222,15 +223,15 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
>>> sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IEV, 1);
>>> } else {
>>> sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IEV,
>>> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV]);
>>> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV]);
>>> }
>>>
>>> /* Set irq unmask */
>>> sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IE,
>>> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE]);
>>> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE]);
>>> /* Generate trigger start pulse for debounce EIC */
>>> sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_TRIG,
>>> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG]);
>>> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG]);
>>>
>>> mutex_unlock(&pmic_eic->buslock);
>>> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Two-dimensional arrays maintain pmic eic
2023-09-21 12:25 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Two-dimensional arrays maintain pmic eic Wenhua Lin
2023-09-27 7:21 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-09-27 9:04 ` Baolin Wang
@ 2023-09-28 9:00 ` Chunyan Zhang
2024-01-02 7:29 ` wenhua lin
2 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Chunyan Zhang @ 2023-09-28 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wenhua Lin
Cc: Linus Walleij, Andy Shevchenko, Bartosz Golaszewski, Orson Zhai,
Baolin Wang, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, wenhua lin, Xiongpeng Wu
On Thu, 21 Sept 2023 at 20:27, Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@unisoc.com> wrote:
>
> A bank PMIC EIC contains 16 EICs, and the operating registers
> are BIT0-BIT15, such as BIT0 of the register operated by EIC0.
> Using the one-dimensional array reg[CACHE_NR_REGS] for maintenance
> will cause the configuration of other EICs to be affected when
> operating a certain EIC. In order to solve this problem, the register
> operation bits of each PMIC EIC are maintained through the two-dimensional
> array reg[SPRD_PMIC_EIC_NR][CACHE_NR_REGS] to avoid mutual interference.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@unisoc.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> index c3e4d90f6b18..442968bb2490 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ struct sprd_pmic_eic {
> struct gpio_chip chip;
> struct regmap *map;
> u32 offset;
> - u8 reg[CACHE_NR_REGS];
> + u8 reg[SPRD_PMIC_EIC_NR][CACHE_NR_REGS];
> struct mutex buslock;
> int irq;
> };
> @@ -151,8 +151,8 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
> struct sprd_pmic_eic *pmic_eic = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> u32 offset = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
>
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] = 0;
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG] = 0;
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE] = 0;
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG] = 0;
I would suggest just using this one-dimensional array which is enough
for saving 16-bit values.
To solve the issue mentioned in the commit message, we can set/clear
the bit according to the value of 'offset', for example:
pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] &= ~BIT(offset);
>
> gpiochip_disable_irq(chip, offset);
> }
> @@ -165,8 +165,8 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
>
> gpiochip_enable_irq(chip, offset);
>
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] = 1;
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG] = 1;
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE] = 1;
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG] = 1;
For setting operations:
pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] |= BIT(offset);
> }
>
> static int sprd_pmic_eic_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data,
> @@ -174,13 +174,14 @@ static int sprd_pmic_eic_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data,
> {
> struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> struct sprd_pmic_eic *pmic_eic = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> + u32 offset = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
>
> switch (flow_type) {
> case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] = 1;
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV] = 1;
> break;
> case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] = 0;
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV] = 0;
> break;
> case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
> case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
> @@ -222,15 +223,15 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
> sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IEV, 1);
> } else {
> sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IEV,
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV]);
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV]);
When using the array we can deal with it like below since
sprd_pmic_eic_update() would do a shift for the parameter 'val':
(pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] & BIT(offset)) ? 1 : 0;
> }
>
> /* Set irq unmask */
> sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IE,
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE]);
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE]);
> /* Generate trigger start pulse for debounce EIC */
> sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_TRIG,
> - pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG]);
> + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG]);
Similar here.
Thanks,
Chunyan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Two-dimensional arrays maintain pmic eic
2023-09-28 9:00 ` Chunyan Zhang
@ 2024-01-02 7:29 ` wenhua lin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: wenhua lin @ 2024-01-02 7:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chunyan Zhang
Cc: Wenhua Lin, Linus Walleij, Andy Shevchenko, Bartosz Golaszewski,
Orson Zhai, Baolin Wang, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, Xiongpeng Wu
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 5:01 PM Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Sept 2023 at 20:27, Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@unisoc.com> wrote:
> >
> > A bank PMIC EIC contains 16 EICs, and the operating registers
> > are BIT0-BIT15, such as BIT0 of the register operated by EIC0.
> > Using the one-dimensional array reg[CACHE_NR_REGS] for maintenance
> > will cause the configuration of other EICs to be affected when
> > operating a certain EIC. In order to solve this problem, the register
> > operation bits of each PMIC EIC are maintained through the two-dimensional
> > array reg[SPRD_PMIC_EIC_NR][CACHE_NR_REGS] to avoid mutual interference.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@unisoc.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> > index c3e4d90f6b18..442968bb2490 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> > @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ struct sprd_pmic_eic {
> > struct gpio_chip chip;
> > struct regmap *map;
> > u32 offset;
> > - u8 reg[CACHE_NR_REGS];
> > + u8 reg[SPRD_PMIC_EIC_NR][CACHE_NR_REGS];
> > struct mutex buslock;
> > int irq;
> > };
> > @@ -151,8 +151,8 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
> > struct sprd_pmic_eic *pmic_eic = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> > u32 offset = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
> >
> > - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] = 0;
> > - pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG] = 0;
> > + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE] = 0;
> > + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG] = 0;
>
> I would suggest just using this one-dimensional array which is enough
> for saving 16-bit values.
>
> To solve the issue mentioned in the commit message, we can set/clear
> the bit according to the value of 'offset', for example:
>
> pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] &= ~BIT(offset);
>
> >
> > gpiochip_disable_irq(chip, offset);
> > }
> > @@ -165,8 +165,8 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
> >
> > gpiochip_enable_irq(chip, offset);
> >
> > - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] = 1;
> > - pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG] = 1;
> > + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE] = 1;
> > + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG] = 1;
>
> For setting operations:
>
> pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] |= BIT(offset);
>
> > }
> >
> > static int sprd_pmic_eic_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data,
> > @@ -174,13 +174,14 @@ static int sprd_pmic_eic_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data,
> > {
> > struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> > struct sprd_pmic_eic *pmic_eic = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> > + u32 offset = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
> >
> > switch (flow_type) {
> > case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
> > - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] = 1;
> > + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV] = 1;
> > break;
> > case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
> > - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] = 0;
> > + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV] = 0;
> > break;
> > case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
> > case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
> > @@ -222,15 +223,15 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
> > sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IEV, 1);
> > } else {
> > sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IEV,
> > - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV]);
> > + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV]);
>
> When using the array we can deal with it like below since
> sprd_pmic_eic_update() would do a shift for the parameter 'val':
>
> (pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] & BIT(offset)) ? 1 : 0;
>
Thank you very much for your review.
I will fix this issue in patch v3.
> > }
> >
> > /* Set irq unmask */
> > sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IE,
> > - pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE]);
> > + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE]);
> > /* Generate trigger start pulse for debounce EIC */
> > sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_TRIG,
> > - pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG]);
> > + pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG]);
>
> Similar here.
>
> Thanks,
> Chunyan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-02 7:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-09-21 12:25 [PATCH V2 0/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Modification of UNISOC Platform PMIC EIC Driver Wenhua Lin
2023-09-21 12:25 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Two-dimensional arrays maintain pmic eic Wenhua Lin
2023-09-27 7:21 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-09-27 9:04 ` Baolin Wang
2023-09-27 9:24 ` Chunyan Zhang
2023-09-27 9:49 ` Baolin Wang
2023-09-28 9:00 ` Chunyan Zhang
2024-01-02 7:29 ` wenhua lin
2023-09-21 12:25 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Add can_sleep flag for PMIC EIC chip Wenhua Lin
2023-09-21 15:39 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-09-27 7:13 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-09-27 9:05 ` Baolin Wang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).