From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4488C433E0 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 08:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6061C23977 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 08:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728023AbhAUI1C (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 03:27:02 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58674 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727937AbhAUI0f (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 03:26:35 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-x22f.google.com (mail-lj1-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F745C0613ED for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:25:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id a25so362698ljn.0 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:25:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RpwN5C2RXaQ8dp8IACeDHHRkP2r9P2ksf6c27smpuuM=; b=wroXOgRGxvgAdh6XmUxeT1ttxKWOVaMvdFZFJQhBT0c/U9vLbK59i1pjwWkCPPHbg3 SENK8j5MT0JcKlASUhH3kyxx8iJk/nKGAIv7Z5lmpDahyFwYYXBDV0n2c0UbfMR82Xcy ku9TDQL33szLi4WYj9YLssJvsGby+3lfVcR+zNbc7Tmg7E+nwQDHgC6205EkNdf2yaHy 9e8+ZBbVwFlfE6qeov941L7wHH+odvQzdIPmnzM+TuecJXsExCQ2QDHSRci4E1CJLBjt N48KkQJHFFAsugDck4kACIF0hWAHpRW3mXW9OyZk4Qv0TvTsZIKSVcKlz6o8KizAMl8V We0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RpwN5C2RXaQ8dp8IACeDHHRkP2r9P2ksf6c27smpuuM=; b=OyjdrN7NVTOExGLfhKtJm9GSZ2RVfFk/xkZnrEecPB9iotcPCrMZ2Q8c/TniVp3B6W 5yW+SDFQxvmoCy0o8thxbZuJmk+pgbHewV77RqCoKgDb03xEauT2xmfc6das6cHprW+e IDY5FMPAaQGvea/QuGlMBiS7UhHMV8G8N/N0wbiFW9poyv0xCDha5lKX2TkBebkxxv9Y FY8/MghGPDnmzTYno8Y7vHm/fAgjEN7jBB0MrSr/vzVjptuesFyNZav4+tG8BPB2yIuB CU21ZlOyfsbeP6xKt1ovjqwOAumOZ8fK+ScVWHnMkmOKQlcKvFlD4aSmeR5lvgn1gPZR gzjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532tr+tOoYu4Tcda8WxcOYzBnHAgzDbhouSKK8MLqIb4H25dzHfa OR4LtbLrhVw82k42xPPbElYqcLLxsn6vgVTBumlWEIheMMmFtA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyBYKaUXGeT7ru4rgRC6OKS2A7qyDna6VLNHBBspM26S5nzG8vnM51ZcKvjNnVklS/ne+kH+hlH6xWzrwzcpBk= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:85d1:: with SMTP id h17mr6337934ljj.438.1611217534069; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:25:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Linus Walleij Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 09:25:23 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 02/10] pinctrl: Add RISC-V Canaan Kendryte K210 FPIOA driver To: Damien Le Moal Cc: Palmer Dabbelt , "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "seanga2@gmail.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 1:15 AM Damien Le Moal wrote: > On 2021/01/21 3:21, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 05:33:05 PST (-0800), linus.walleij@linaro.org wrote: > >> Hi Damien, > >> > >> this looks all right to me. > >> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij > >> > >> Shall I apply just this one patch to the pinctrl tree? > > > > That's fine with me. The DT bindings are in riscv/for-next, maybe it's best to > > take those as well and I'll drop them? I don't generally like to drop stuff > > from for-next, but that's probably better than having everything all mixed up. > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=ed3137edb31b86702511e7ad12b4abe8686b6805 > > > >> I think the line that touches arch/*/Kconfig should be dropped > >> then, that better go to the SoC tree. > > > > I'm OK with you taking them along with my Ack, but if you don't want to that's > > fine. Just LMK > > > > Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt > > Linus, > > Please let me know which way you want to proceed. If you want to take the patch, > I will resend without the Kconfig change and move that change to another patch. It's fine to proceed as is, since Palmer already applied the bindings to his tree, just apply the pinctrl driver there as well. I don't see any risk of collisions in the tree. Yours, Linus Walleij