From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/27] sh-pfc: Support pins with no associated GPIO port
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 10:59:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYFWJbHkwffrFes4o4btCGaZdXJxmxgxxMb_Mpc__5eQA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1373933479-17727-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
	<11379562.iEdjek24uT@avalon>
	<20130719021045.GE4403@verge.net.au>
	<20130921004335.GA26271@verge.net.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130921004335.GA26271@verge.net.au>
Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>, "linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>, Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> I am currently rebasing the renesas tree on v3.12-rc1 in preparation
> for preparing pull-requests for v3.13. Should I continue to carry
> sh-pfc/pins-with-no-gpio-port in devel?

Sounds like something I should carry in the pinctrl tree?

Yours,
Linus Walleij