Possible regression in next-20150310 due to pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7790: Remove non existing GPIO pins

Possible regression in next-20150310 due to pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7790: Remove non existing GPIO pins

[Simon Horman]

Hi,

I have observed what appears to be a regression in next-20150310.  Using
the shmobile_defconfig the lager board does not produce console output
whatsoever. If I revert bfb6698fad74e7ba2 ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7790:
Remove non existing GPIO pins") then the problem seems to be resolved.

Likewise for the koelsh board and 896498d439cec6ff0 ("pinctrl: sh-pfc:
r8a7791: Remove non existing GPIO pins").


N.B.: In order to boot all the way to user-space I also need to revert
5da0e63e268dc5120 ("mmc: tmio: Fix PIO mode with CONFIG_HIGHMEM"), a
problem that I have reported separately[1].

[1] Possible regression in next-20150306 due to "mmc: tmio: Fix PIO mode
with CONFIG_HIGHMEM"
    http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-sh/msg40804.html

> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> 
> Patch applied with Geert's ACK.
> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

Re: Possible regression in next-20150310 due to pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7790: Remove non existing GPIO pins

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Simon,

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> I have observed what appears to be a regression in next-20150310.  Using
> the shmobile_defconfig the lager board does not produce console output
> whatsoever. If I revert bfb6698fad74e7ba2 ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7790:
> Remove non existing GPIO pins") then the problem seems to be resolved.
>
> Likewise for the koelsh board and 896498d439cec6ff0 ("pinctrl: sh-pfc:
> r8a7791: Remove non existing GPIO pins").

That's correct. I reverted these in renesas-drivers-2015-03-09-v4.0-rc3.

In the mean time, they have been dropped from pinctrl/for-next, as
requested by Laurent last week.

Sorry for the issues.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Re: Possible regression in next-20150310 due to pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7790: Remove non existing GPIO pins

[Linus Walleij]

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:

> I have observed what appears to be a regression in next-20150310.  Using
> the shmobile_defconfig the lager board does not produce console output
> whatsoever. If I revert bfb6698fad74e7ba2 ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7790:
> Remove non existing GPIO pins") then the problem seems to be resolved.

I have removed these two patches from the tree since last night.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: Possible regression in next-20150310 due to pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7790: Remove non existing GPIO pins

[Simon Horman]

Hi Geert, Hi Linus,

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:30:54AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> 
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> > I have observed what appears to be a regression in next-20150310.  Using
> > the shmobile_defconfig the lager board does not produce console output
> > whatsoever. If I revert bfb6698fad74e7ba2 ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7790:
> > Remove non existing GPIO pins") then the problem seems to be resolved.
> >
> > Likewise for the koelsh board and 896498d439cec6ff0 ("pinctrl: sh-pfc:
> > r8a7791: Remove non existing GPIO pins").
> 
> That's correct. I reverted these in renesas-drivers-2015-03-09-v4.0-rc3.
> 
> In the mean time, they have been dropped from pinctrl/for-next, as
> requested by Laurent last week.
> 
> Sorry for the issues.

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:00:05PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> 
> > I have observed what appears to be a regression in next-20150310.  Using
> > the shmobile_defconfig the lager board does not produce console output
> > whatsoever. If I revert bfb6698fad74e7ba2 ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7790:
> > Remove non existing GPIO pins") then the problem seems to be resolved.
> 
> I have removed these two patches from the tree since last night.

Thanks, for the quick responses.
I'll be happy to see next working again :)